• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 1 pages
Case

PSY-402 Topic 2 DQ1

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 1 pages

PSY-402 Topic 2 DQ1 What does the case of Phineas Gage reveal about localization of functions in the brain? How can modern neuroscientists and psychologists learn from his injury? Class, The case of Phineas Gage has revealed much to the sciences. Within the topic of neuroscience, many have researched the case of Phineas Gage, but a study done in 2012 looked specifically at the recovery of Phineas Gage rather than the injury. Phineas Gage’s recovery had setbacks, but the fact he lived and went on the be independent enough to travel and work for another 12 years before his death, was nothing short of miraculous. Van Horn, Irimia, Torgerson, Chambers and Kilkiins found his recovery meant that though he did have extensive damage, the injury itself was average in the scheme of brain lesions which explains his recovery and ability to function. All his other setbacks are indicative of white matter loss in the frontal lobe, but not to a major extent. This study has furthered the knowledge of neuroscientists and given a greater understanding of brain lesion, white matter injury and recovery from injury and disease affecting the brain’s white matter. Within the world of psychology, the case of Phineas Gage proved once and for all that the orbitofrontal cortex is the region on the brain connected to social behavior. Other similar cases to Phineas Gage have allow psychologists to study them and their similar changes in behavior which has then led to harder questions such as why other more complex mental abilities remain intact after such injuries as those incurred by Gage (Gazzaniga, Ivry & Mangun, 2013). Understanding which parts of the brain are connected to which behaviors and functions in priceless when it comes to understanding and helping people who suffer. Van Horn, J. D., Irimia, A., Torgerson, C. M., Chambers, M. C., Kikinis, R., & Toga, A. W. (2012). Mapping Connectivity Damage in the Case of Phineas Gage. Plos ONE, 7(5), 1-24. doi:10.1371/. Gazzaniga, M., Ivry, R., & Mangun, G. (2013). Cognitive neuroscience: The biology of the mind (4th ed.). New York, NY: Norton.


Document information

Uploaded on
January 15, 2022
Number of pages
1
Written in
2021/2022
Type
Case
Professor(s)
Professor
Grade
A+
$8.44

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Topscorer1
3.8
(40)
Sold
250
Followers
207
Items
7227
Last sold
5 months ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions

Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.