• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 4 pages
Summary

Summary public law

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 4 pages

human rights & Public Law

Content preview

Constitutional Protection of Human Rights in the UK – The Human Rights Act
Reading:

Core reading: Foster, p. 88-163.

Additional reading: Bradley and Ewing, Constitutional and Administrative Law, 14 th ed., p. 419-442.




In this lecture we will concentrate on the the Human Rights Act 1998 and the way rights were incorporated into English
law. This lecture will discuss why the Human Rights Act was passed and how it incorporates human rights into English
law. Lastly we will reflect on how the HRA affects doctrines familiar to you from Constitutional Law, such as
Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Separation of Powers.




Protection of Human Rights prior to the Human Rights Act

Even before the Human Rights Act, constitutional protection of human right existed in English law. This constitutional
protection continues to exist, now in addition to the

The common law principle is that whatever Parliament has not prohibited is permissible, and the government
(executive) has no right to restrict. This principle is the basis of civil liberties in English law.

Entick v. Carrington (1765) 19 St Tr 1030




The United Kingdom was one of the original signatories of the ECHR. But, it did not incorporate the convention in UK
law. That means that it had an international obligation to uphold the Convention, and British citizens could apply to the
Strasbourg Court to uphold their Convention rights, but it was not part of UK law.




This meant that the discretion of UK government ministers to use their ministerial powers was not fettered by the
Convention. (A decision to ban broadcast of IRA members unfettered by Artcile 10).

R v. Home Secretary, ex p Brind [1991] AC 696




But, the House of Lords did refer to the Convention, where it would have reached the same decision it reached under
the common law. (That local authorities could not sue in libel, and it did not breach Article 10).

Derbyshire County Council v. Times Newspapers Ltd [1993] 1 All ER 1011.

Document information

Study
Uploaded on
December 17, 2021
Number of pages
4
Written in
2019/2020
Type
Summary
$11.03

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
0
Followers
0
Items
90
Last sold
-



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions