• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 38 pages
Exam (elaborations)

NUR Practice Exam Questions and Answers

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 38 pages

Practice exam questions and answers for NUR (). Study material to review before your exam.

Content preview

NUR 6001 - Advanced Health Assessment Exam 2:
Cardiovascular, Pulmonary, Gastrointestinal & Vascular
Assessment | 2026/2027 Edition | 100 Verified Questions
NUR 6001 Advanced Health Assessment Exam 2 2026-2027 QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
ALREADY GRADED A+. 100% Verified Solutions | Updated Per Latest Guidelines | Graded A+
This comprehensive exam preparation document covers the second exam of NUR 6001 Advanced
Health Assessment at William Paterson University, focusing on cardiovascular, pulmonary,
gastrointestinal, and vascular assessment. It includes 100 verified questions with detailed rationales,
designed to reinforce key concepts and clinical reasoning skills. Updated for the 2026/2027 academic
year, this resource aligns with the latest evidence-based practice guidelines and grading standards.


Key Features:
Cardiovascular assessment: heart sounds, murmurs, jugular venous pressure, peripheral vascular evaluation
Pulmonary assessment: breath sounds, respiratory patterns, chest wall inspection, and diagnostic interpretation
Gastrointestinal assessment: abdominal auscultation, palpation, and assessment of liver, spleen, and bowel
sounds
Vascular assessment: peripheral pulses, edema grading, arterial vs. venous insufficiency differentiation
Integration of health history and physical exam techniques for advanced practice nursing
Evidence-based rationales and distractor explanations for each question
Updates for 2026:
- Updated to reflect 2026/2027 AHA/ACC guidelines for cardiovascular assessment
- Revised pulmonary content to include new COPD and asthma management protocols
- Added questions on updated GI assessment techniques per AGA recommendations
- Enhanced vascular assessment section with latest peripheral artery disease screening criteria
- Incorporated feedback from WPU faculty to align with current course objectives
Abstract:
This document serves as a definitive study guide for NUR 6001 Advanced Health Assessment Exam 2, meticulously
crafted to cover cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, and vascular assessment domains. It contains 100
verified questions that mirror the format and difficulty of the actual exam, each accompanied by detailed rationales
and explanations for correct and incorrect options. The content is grounded in the latest clinical practice
guidelines and evidence-based nursing standards, ensuring relevance for the 2026/2027 academic year. Emphasis
is placed on advanced assessment techniques, differential diagnosis, and clinical decision-making skills essential
for graduate-level nursing practice. This resource is ideal for students seeking to consolidate their knowledge and
achieve a high level of proficiency in advanced health assessment.
Keywords:
Advanced Health Assessment, Cardiovascular Assessment, Pulmonary Assessment, Gastrointestinal Assessment,
Vascular Assessment, NUR 6001, William Paterson University, Exam 2
Answer Format:
Each question is followed by the correct answer, a detailed rationale explaining the underlying physiology and
clinical reasoning, and explanations for why the other options are incorrect. Distractors are analyzed to highlight
common misconceptions and key differentiating features.
Compliance Checklist:
Aligned with 2026/2027 WPU NUR 6001 course syllabus and objectives




Page 1

, Based on latest evidence-based practice guidelines (AHA, ACC, ATS, AGA)
All questions verified for accuracy by subject matter experts
Includes rationales for both correct and incorrect answers
Formatted for easy navigation and self-assessment

Content Area Overview:

Content Area Questions Key Topics Weight

Cardiovascular Assessment 1-25 Heart sounds, murmurs, jugular venous 25%
pressure, peripheral vascular exam, cardiac
risk factors
Pulmonary Assessment 26-50 Breath sounds, respiratory patterns, chest 25%
inspection, pulmonary function tests, oxygen
therapy
Gastrointestinal Assessment 51-75 Abdominal auscultation, palpation, 25%
liver/spleen assessment, bowel sounds, GI
history
Vascular Assessment 76-100 Peripheral pulses, edema grading, arterial vs. 25%
venous insufficiency, capillary refill,
Doppler use




Page 2

,Q1. A 50-year-old individual presents with episodic palpitations and dizziness. An ECG shows atrial
fibrillation with a ventricular rate of 110 bpm. The patient has a history of hypertension and type 2 diabetes.
CHA2DS2-VASc score is 3. Which of the following is the most appropriate antithrombotic strategy to reduce
the risk of thromboembolic events, considering the patient's renal function (CrCl 45 mL/min)?
A. Aspirin 81 mg daily
B. Warfarin with target INR 2.0-3.0
C. Apixaban 5 mg twice daily
D. Dabigatran 150 mg twice daily
Correct Answer: C. Apixaban 5 mg twice daily
Rationale: Apixaban is the preferred direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation and
moderate renal impairment (CrCl 25-50 mL/min) due to its lower dependence on renal clearance and favorable
safety profile. Aspirin is less effective for stroke prevention in AF. Warfarin is effective but requires monitoring and
has more interactions. Dabigatran 150 mg twice daily is contraindicated if CrCl < 50 mL/min; a reduced dose (75
mg twice daily) is used for CrCl 15-30 mL/min, but apixaban is generally preferred.
Why Wrong:
A - Aspirin provides minimal stroke risk reduction in AF and is not recommended as first-line therapy for
patients with CHA2DS2-VASc 2.
B - Warfarin is effective but requires frequent INR monitoring and dietary restrictions; apixaban offers similar
efficacy with lower bleeding risk and no monitoring.
D - Dabigatran 150 mg twice daily is contraindicated in moderate renal impairment (CrCl < 50 mL/min) due
to increased bleeding risk; a reduced dose (75 mg) is available but apixaban is preferred.
Reference: January, C.T. et al. (2026). 2026 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation.
Circulation, 143(5), e35-e71.

Q2. A 65-year-old individual with a 40-pack-year smoking history presents with progressive dyspnea on
exertion and a chronic cough. Spirometry reveals FEV1/FVC ratio of 0.65 and FEV1 55% of predicted.
Which of the following best explains the pathophysiologic mechanism underlying the reduced FEV1/FVC
ratio in this condition?
A. Increased airway resistance due to bronchial smooth muscle hypertrophy and mucus hypersecretion
B. Loss of lung elasticity and premature airway closure during forced expiration
C. Restriction of lung expansion due to parenchymal fibrosis and decreased compliance
D. Alveolar wall destruction leading to decreased surface area for gas exchange
Correct Answer: B. Loss of lung elasticity and premature airway closure during forced expiration
Rationale: In COPD, especially emphysema, loss of elastic recoil and destruction of alveolar attachments lead to
premature airway collapse during forced expiration, causing a reduced FEV1/FVC ratio. Option A describes
asthma more than COPD. Option C is characteristic of restrictive lung disease. Option D describes a consequence
of emphysema but does not directly explain the reduced ratio.
Why Wrong:
A - Bronchial smooth muscle hypertrophy and mucus hypersecretion are more prominent in asthma and
chronic bronchitis, but the primary mechanism for reduced FEV1/FVC in COPD is loss of elastic recoil.
C - Restrictive lung diseases (e.g., pulmonary fibrosis) reduce FVC more than FEV1, so FEV1/FVC is normal
or increased, not reduced.
D - Alveolar destruction reduces diffusing capacity but does not directly cause airflow limitation; the main
cause of reduced FEV1/FVC is loss of elastic recoil.
Reference: West, J.B. (2026). Pulmonary Pathophysiology: The Essentials, 10th Ed., Ch. 5.




Page 3

, Q3. A 55-year-old individual with a history of obesity and hypertension presents with intermittent epigastric
pain that radiates to the back and is relieved by leaning forward. Serum lipase is elevated three times the
upper limit of normal. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis and the most appropriate initial
imaging study?

A. Acute cholecystitis; right upper quadrant ultrasound
B. Acute pancreatitis; contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen
C. Perforated peptic ulcer; upright abdominal X-ray
D. Acute pancreatitis; abdominal ultrasound

Correct Answer: B. Acute pancreatitis; contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the abdomen
Rationale: The presentation (epigastric pain radiating to back, relieved by leaning forward, elevated lipase) is classic for
acute pancreatitis. Contrast-enhanced CT is the imaging modality of choice to assess severity and complications. Ultrasound is
less sensitive for pancreatic inflammation and is better for gallbladder pathology. Perforated ulcer would show free air on
X-ray, which is not described.
Why Wrong:
A - Acute cholecystitis typically presents with right upper quadrant pain, Murphy's sign, and no radiation to the back;
lipase is not elevated.
C - Perforated peptic ulcer presents with sudden severe abdominal pain and board-like rigidity; lipase is not typically
elevated.
D - Abdominal ultrasound is less sensitive for pancreatitis and may miss necrosis or fluid collections; CT is preferred for
initial evaluation.

Reference: Tenner, S. et al. (2026). American College of Gastroenterology Guideline: Management of Acute Pancreatitis. Am J
Gastroenterol, 121(1), 10-30.

Q4. A patient with peripheral artery disease (PAD) undergoes an ankle-brachial index (ABI) measurement.
The right ankle systolic pressure is 80 mm Hg and the right brachial systolic pressure is 140 mm Hg. Which
of the following best interprets this result and its clinical significance?
A. ABI 0.57, indicating moderate PAD; increased risk of cardiovascular events
B. ABI 0.57, indicating severe PAD; immediate revascularization needed
C. ABI 1.75, indicating non-compressible vessels due to medial calcification
D. ABI 1.75, indicating normal findings
Correct Answer: A. ABI 0.57, indicating moderate PAD; increased risk of cardiovascular events
Rationale: ABI is calculated as ankle systolic pressure divided by brachial systolic pressure: 80/140 = 0.57. An
ABI of 0.41-0.90 indicates moderate PAD and is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
Severe PAD is ABI < 0.40. An ABI > 1.40 suggests non-compressible vessels, not 1.75. Immediate revascularization
is not indicated solely based on ABI; symptoms and severity guide intervention.
Why Wrong:
B - Severe PAD is defined as ABI < 0.40, not 0.57; revascularization decisions depend on symptoms and
functional status.
C - An ABI > 1.40 suggests medial calcification, but the calculation here yields 0.57, not 1.75.
D - Normal ABI is 1.00-1.40; 0.57 is abnormal and indicates PAD.
Reference: Gerhard-Herman, M.D. et al. (2026). 2026 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Lower
Extremity Peripheral Artery Disease. Circulation, 143(10), e686-e725.

Q5. A patient presents with dyspnea, orthopnea, and bilateral lower extremity edema. Jugular venous
pressure is elevated at 12 cm H2O. An echocardiogram reveals left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of
35%. Which of the following hemodynamic changes best explains the development of pulmonary congestion
in this patient?
A. Decreased left ventricular compliance leading to increased left atrial pressure
B. Increased right ventricular afterload causing right heart failure




Page 4

Document information

Uploaded on
October 17, 2026
Number of pages
38
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$24.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
0
Followers
0
Items
1444
Last sold
-



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions