• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 31 pages
Exam (elaborations)

NCLEX-RN 2026/2027 Next Gen Clinical Judgment Case Studies Practice Exam | 50 NGN Questions with Rationales (Bow-Tie, Matrix, Cloze, SATA)

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 31 pages

Practice the way the Next Generation NCLEX asks questions. This original 50-question practice exam is built around six unfolding NGN case studies (heart failure, septic shock, diabetic ketoacidosis, acute stroke, cirrhosis with variceal bleeding, and pediatric asthma). Each case takes you through the six clinical judgment steps: recognize cues, analyze cues, prioritize hypotheses, generate solutions, take action, and evaluate outcomes, using NGN item types such as bow-tie, matrix, drop-down cloze, and highlight / select-all-that-apply. Fourteen more stand-alone questions cover prioritization, delegation, infection control, dosage calculation, therapeutic communication, and patient safety. Every question includes the correct answer and a detailed rationale that explains why the other options are wrong. A quick-reference answer key at the end lets you score yourself in minutes. 31-page PDF in a clean navy and teal layout; a Word (.docx) version is included for printing and annotating.

Content preview

NCLEX-RN • NEXT GENERATION (NGN)

Clinical Judgment Case Studies
Practice Exam 2026/2027
50 Original NGN-Style Questions with Correct Answers
& Detailed Rationales | 6 Unfolding Case Studies




50 6 8 100%
Original questions Unfolding case studies Item formats Rationales included




WHAT'S INSIDE
✓ 6 unfolding case studies (6 items each) that walk through the clinical judgment steps: recognize cues, analyze cues,
prioritize hypotheses, generate solutions, take action, evaluate outcomes
✓ Case topics: heart failure, septic shock, diabetic ketoacidosis, acute ischemic stroke, cirrhosis with variceal
bleeding, pediatric asthma
✓ 14 stand-alone items: prioritization, delegation, infection control, dosage calculation, communication, and safety
✓ NGN formats: bow-tie, matrix, drop-down cloze, highlight / select all that apply, plus multiple choice, ordered
response, and fill-in-the-blank
✓ A correct answer and a detailed rationale (including why the other options are wrong) for every question
✓ Quick-reference answer key for fast self-scoring



Disclaimer: Original practice questions for study purposes; not affiliated with ATI, HESI, or NCSBN. Content reflects
current standard nursing references at the time of writing; always follow your program's materials, facility protocols, and
prescriber orders in clinical practice.

, NCLEX-RN 2026/2027 Next Gen Clinical Judgment Case Studies Practice Exam | 50 Original Questions with Rationales


Table of Contents
Sections, question numbers, and page locations

# Section Questions Page

1 Case Study 1: Heart Failure with Fluid Overload Q1–Q6 (6) 3

2 Case Study 2: Septic Shock from Urinary Source Q7–Q12 (6) 7

3 Case Study 3: Diabetic Ketoacidosis Q13–Q18 (6) 10

4 Case Study 4: Acute Ischemic Stroke Q19–Q24 (6) 13

5 Case Study 5: Cirrhosis with Variceal Bleeding Q25–Q30 (6) 16

6 Case Study 6: Pediatric Asthma Exacerbation Q31–Q36 (6) 20

7 Prioritization, Delegation & Safety Q37–Q43 (7) 23

8 Rapid-Fire Clinical Judgment: Communication, Procedures & Ethics Q44–Q50 (7) 27

Quick-Reference Answer Key Q1–Q50 31



How to Use This Exam
• Read the whole client scenario first, then answer the six items in order: each step builds on the one before it.
• Cover the answer box beneath each question and commit to an answer before reading the rationale.
• Select-all-that-apply, highlight, and matrix items are scored per option: judge every option as true or false on
its own.
• For bow-tie items choose one condition, two actions, and two monitoring parameters that match each other.
• Read every rationale, including why the wrong options are wrong; this is where most of the learning happens.
• Use the answer key at the end to self-score a timed attempt (aim for about 1 to 1.5 minutes per item).


Disclaimer: Original practice questions for study purposes; not affiliated with ATI, HESI, or NCSBN. All questions were
written from scratch and are not reproduced from any exam, publisher, or question bank. This document is an
educational study aid and is not a substitute for clinical judgment, institutional protocols, or professional references.




Original practice questions for study purposes; not affiliated with ATI, HESI, or NCSBN. • Page 2

, NCLEX-RN 2026/2027 Next Gen Clinical Judgment Case Studies Practice Exam | 50 Original Questions with Rationales


SECTION 1

Case Study 1: Heart Failure with Fluid Overload
Questions 1–6



Client Scenario
Client: A 72-year-old man with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, hypertension, and type 2 diabetes
is admitted with 3 days of worsening shortness of breath, a 6-lb (2.7-kg) weight gain over 4 days, and needing
3 pillows to sleep.
Home medications: Lisinopril, carvedilol, furosemide 40 mg PO daily, metformin.
Assessment: BP 148/92, HR 112, RR 28, SpO₂ 89% on room air, T 37.0 °C (98.6 °F). Bilateral crackles to the
mid-lung fields, jugular vein distention, S3 gallop, 3+ pitting edema to the knees.
Labs: BNP 1,450 pg/mL (elevated); K⁺ 3.4 mEq/L; Na⁺ 133 mEq/L; creatinine 1.4 mg/dL.



Question 1 NGN Highlight / Select All • Recognize Cues
Which findings indicate fluid volume overload? Select all that apply.
☐ A. Serum potassium 3.4 mEq/L
☐ B. Bilateral crackles to the mid-lung fields
☐ C. Temperature 37.0 °C (98.6 °F)
☐ D. Weight gain of 6 lb in 4 days
☐ E. Jugular vein distention
☐ F. 3+ pitting edema to the knees


Correct Answer: B, D, E, F
Rationale: Rapid weight gain (about 2.2 lb or 1 kg of fluid per day above baseline is concerning), crackles from
pulmonary congestion, JVD, and dependent pitting edema all reflect retained fluid and elevated filling
pressures. The temperature is normal and does not point to volume overload. A low potassium level is a
separate finding (likely from diuretic therapy) that matters for treatment but is not itself a sign of fluid
overload.




Original practice questions for study purposes; not affiliated with ATI, HESI, or NCSBN. • Page 3

, NCLEX-RN 2026/2027 Next Gen Clinical Judgment Case Studies Practice Exam | 50 Original Questions with Rationales

Question 2 NGN Matrix • Analyze Cues



For each finding, indicate whether it is more characteristic of LEFT-sided or RIGHT-sided heart failure.
Finding Left-sided Right-sided

1. Bilateral crackles and dyspnea ☐ ☐
2. Jugular vein distention ☐ ☐
3. Orthopnea (needs 3 pillows) ☐ ☐
4. 3+ peripheral edema to the knees ☐ ☐
5. Hepatomegaly with right upper ☐ ☐
quadrant tenderness




Correct Answer: 1: Left-sided; 2: Right-sided; 3: Left-sided; 4: Right-sided; 5: Right-sided
Rationale: Left ventricular failure backs blood into the lungs, causing crackles, dyspnea, orthopnea, and
pulmonary edema. Right ventricular failure backs blood into the systemic venous system, causing JVD,
dependent peripheral edema, hepatomegaly, and ascites. This client shows signs of both, which is common
because left-sided failure is the usual cause of right-sided failure.


Question 3 Multiple Choice • Prioritize Hypotheses
Which client problem is the highest priority at this time?
A. Excess fluid volume related to sodium and water retention
B. Impaired gas exchange related to pulmonary congestion (SpO₂ 89%, RR 28)
C. Deficient knowledge related to medication adherence
D. Activity intolerance related to decreased cardiac output


Correct Answer: B
Rationale: Hypoxemia and tachypnea from pulmonary edema threaten oxygenation, so airway, breathing, and
circulation order applies. Fluid excess, activity intolerance, and teaching needs are all real problems, but they
are addressed after oxygenation is improved.




Original practice questions for study purposes; not affiliated with ATI, HESI, or NCSBN. • Page 4

Document information

Uploaded on
October 12, 2026
Number of pages
31
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$21.98

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
sharpmind
4.7
(23)
Sold
134
Followers
34
Items
623
Last sold
9 months ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions