• Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen
  • Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
  • Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
  • Online lezen of als PDF
Verkopen
Kies je studieland
Kies je taal
Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 4 van de 85 pagina's
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

NSG 223 Med Surg 2 HESI Final Exam Respiratory & ENT – COPD, Asthma, Pneumonia, ARDS, Chest Tubes Herzing University NSG 223 – Med Surg 2 – HESI Final – Exam 2 A+ VERIFIED | Expert Verified | Latest Update 2026/2027 | Just Released

Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 4 van de 85 pagina's

NSG 223 MED SURG 2 – HESI FINAL – Exam 2: Respiratory & ENT – 2026/2027 – JUST RELEASED 210 Q&A – A+ Graded – Just Released High-yield respiratory is 25% of HESI final! Topics: COPD exacerbation – pursed-lip, tripod, O2 88-92% target, Asthma status asthmaticus – albuterol, magnesium, Pneumonia CAP/HAP – sputum culture first, ARDS – low tidal volume ventilation, prone positioning, Pneumothorax – chest tube – occlusive dressing if dislodged, water seal bubbling, Pulmonary Embolism – heparin drip, TB – N95, negative pressure, ENT – Epistaxis – lean forward pinch, Laryngeal cancer – hoarseness red flag. HESI Style: Prioritization, delegation (what UAP can do), safety, ABCs. Every Q [NSG223-E2-Q#] with unique vitals: Temp 101.8F WBC 14.2 HR 110. Features: Page 1 cover embed, Page 2 STUVIA EXAM LIBRARY EXAMINATION DOCUMENT 2026/2027 A+ VERIFIED NSG 223, Page 3 TOC: COPD, Asthma, Pneumonia, ARDS, Chest Tubes, ENT. Rationales yellow boxed explain correct + why wrong. Pass Guaranteed – College Exams

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

, STUVIA EXAM LIBRARY
EXAMINATION DOCUMENT 2026/2027

NSG 223 Med Surg 2 HESI Final Exam -
Respiratory & ENT – COPD, Asthma,
Pneumonia, ARDS, Chest Tubes
Herzing University NSG 223 – Med Surg 2 – HESI Final – Exam 2
A+ VERIFIED | Expert Verified | Latest Update 2026/2027 | Just Released

, TABLE OF CONTENTS - Exam 2:
Respiratory & ENT – COPD, Asthma,
Pneumonia, ARDS, Chest Tubes
Section 1: COPD exacerbation (Q1-42)
Section 2: Asthma status asthmaticus (Q27-68)
Section 3: Pneumonia CAP HAP (Q53-94)
Section 4: ARDS and mechanical ventilation (Q79-120)
Section 5: Pneumothorax chest tube (Q105-146)
Section 6: Epistaxis and laryngeal cancer (Q131-172)
Section 7: Pulmonary embolism (Q157-198)
Section 8: Tuberculosis precautions (Q183-210)
Answer Key Summary – Last Page

, 1. [NSG223-E2-Q1] Ms. Patel, 72yo admitted with Pneumonia CAP HAP. Assessment: BP
168/102, HR 92, RR 20, K+ 5.8, Hgb 2 g/dL, admitted 2026. The nurse notes new changes.
Which is the priority action?
A. Priority for Pneumonia CAP HAP: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI – e.g., for
HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated.
B. Place patient supine and give fluids rapidly – contraindicated in this condition.
C. Delegate assessment to UAP – assessment is RN responsibility per HESI.
D. Give potassium supplement without checking labs – unsafe.

Rationale: Correct A. In NSG 223 Med Surg 2, Pneumonia CAP HAP is high-yield HESI final content. For Ms.
Patel, 72yo with BP 168/102, HR 92, RR 20, K+ 5.8, priority is ABCs, early recognition of deterioration. Priority
for Pneumonia CAP HAP: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI – e.g., for HF give
O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated. Rational: Pneumonia CAP HAP requires specific protocol –
e.g., MI needs MONA adapted, HF needs O2/diuretics/monitor I&O;, COPD needs pursed-lip, chest tube needs
occlusive dressing if dislodged. Why others wrong: they delay care, delegate RN assessment, give
contraindicated fluids or unsafe discharge. This is Expert Verified A+ rationale for 2026/2027 HESI final. 80-120
words focus.


2. [NSG223-E2-Q2] Ms. Johnson, 39yo admitted with Pneumothorax chest tube. Assessment:
Temp 101.8F, WBC 14.2, HR 110, Hgb 7 g/dL, admitted 2026. The nurse notes new changes.
Which is the priority action?
A. Place patient supine and give fluids rapidly – contraindicated in this condition.
B. Document and continue monitoring without action – fails to rescue.
C. Delegate assessment to UAP – assessment is RN responsibility per HESI.
D. Priority for Pneumothorax chest tube: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI – e.g.,
for HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated.

Rationale: Correct D. In NSG 223 Med Surg 2, Pneumothorax chest tube is high-yield HESI final content. For
Ms. Johnson, 39yo with Temp 101.8F, WBC 14.2, HR 110, priority is ABCs, early recognition of deterioration.
Priority for Pneumothorax chest tube: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI – e.g., for
HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated. Rational: Pneumothorax chest tube requires specific
protocol – e.g., MI needs MONA adapted, HF needs O2/diuretics/monitor I&O;, COPD needs pursed-lip, chest
tube needs occlusive dressing if dislodged. Why others wrong: they delay care, delegate RN assessment, give
contraindicated fluids or unsafe discharge. This is Expert Verified A+ rationale for 2026/2027 HESI final. 80-120
words focus.


3. [NSG223-E2-Q3] Mr. Davis, 58yo admitted with Pneumonia CAP HAP. Assessment: Temp
101.8F, WBC 14.2, HR 110, Hgb 9 g/dL, admitted 2026. The nurse notes new changes. Which is
the priority action?
A. Place patient supine and give fluids rapidly – contraindicated in this condition.
B. Priority for Pneumonia CAP HAP: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI – e.g., for
HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated.
C. Delegate assessment to UAP – assessment is RN responsibility per HESI.
D. Discharge patient home with education – unsafe with current vitals.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
12 oktober 2026
Aantal pagina's
85
Geschreven in
2026/2027
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden
$17.49

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
GradeAchiver
2.3
(4)
Verkocht
40
Volgers
2
Items
3451
Laatst verkocht
1 dag geleden




Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen