• Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen
  • Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
  • Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
  • Online lezen of als PDF
Verkopen
Kies je studieland
Kies je taal
Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 4 van de 85 pagina's
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

NSG 223 Med Surg 2 HESI Final Exam - GI, Endocrine, Renal – Cirrhosis, Pancreatitis, DKA, AKI, CKD Herzing University NSG 223 – Med Surg 2 – HESI Final – Exam 3 A+ VERIFIED | Expert Verified | Latest Update 2026/2027 | Just Released

Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 4 van de 85 pagina's

NSG 223 – Exam 3: GI, Endocrine, Renal – HESI FINAL – 2026/2027 – Expert Verified 210 Unique Q&A – Latest Update Covers the hardest Med Surg 2 systems – all HESI final blueprint! Topics: GI: Liver cirrhosis – esophageal varices – no NG tube, low sodium, lactulose, Pancreatitis – NPO, NG, pain, Cholecystitis – Murphy's sign, IBD Crohn's vs Ulcerative Colitis Endocrine: DKA – K+ first, fluids first, HHS – dehydration, Thyroid storm – hyperthermia, Myxedema – hypothermia, hypoglycemia protocol Renal: AKI prerenal/intrarenal/postrenal, CKD – hyperkalemia K+ 5.8, dialysis disequilibrium, peritoneal dialysis – cloudy effluent infection Example: [NSG223-E3-Q89] Ms. Patel 72yo BP 168/102 K+ 5.8 with CKD – priority? Yellow rationale 80-120 words. Stuvia-Ready: Dark blue #0B1F4B + gold cover, 24pt Bold title, 11pt Bold questions, balanced answers, answer key summary last page. Verified Solutions – Just Released

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

, STUVIA EXAM LIBRARY
EXAMINATION DOCUMENT 2026/2027

NSG 223 Med Surg 2 HESI Final Exam - GI,
Endocrine, Renal – Cirrhosis, Pancreatitis,
DKA, AKI, CKD
Herzing University NSG 223 – Med Surg 2 – HESI Final – Exam 3
A+ VERIFIED | Expert Verified | Latest Update 2026/2027 | Just Released

, TABLE OF CONTENTS - Exam 3: GI,
Endocrine, Renal – Cirrhosis, Pancreatitis,
DKA, AKI, CKD
Section 1: Liver cirrhosis esophageal varices (Q1-42)
Section 2: Pancreatitis acute chronic (Q27-68)
Section 3: Cholecystitis cholelithiasis (Q53-94)
Section 4: DKA vs HHS (Q79-120)
Section 5: Thyroid storm myxedema (Q105-146)
Section 6: Acute kidney injury (Q131-172)
Section 7: Chronic kidney disease dialysis (Q157-198)
Section 8: IBD Crohn's ulcerative colitis (Q183-210)
Answer Key Summary – Last Page

, 1. [NSG223-E3-Q1] Mr. Thompson, 45yo admitted with Cholecystitis cholelithiasis.
Assessment: BP 168/102, HR 92, RR 20, K+ 5.8, Hgb 9 g/dL, admitted 2026. The nurse notes
new changes. Which is the priority action?
A. Administer PRN pain med and recheck in 1 hour – delays priority ABCs.
B. Priority for Cholecystitis cholelithiasis: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI – e.g.,
for HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated.
C. Delegate assessment to UAP – assessment is RN responsibility per HESI.
D. Document and continue monitoring without action – fails to rescue.

Rationale: Correct B. In NSG 223 Med Surg 2, Cholecystitis cholelithiasis is high-yield HESI final content. For
Mr. Thompson, 45yo with BP 168/102, HR 92, RR 20, K+ 5.8, priority is ABCs, early recognition of deterioration.
Priority for Cholecystitis cholelithiasis: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI – e.g., for
HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated. Rational: Cholecystitis cholelithiasis requires specific
protocol – e.g., MI needs MONA adapted, HF needs O2/diuretics/monitor I&O;, COPD needs pursed-lip, chest
tube needs occlusive dressing if dislodged. Why others wrong: they delay care, delegate RN assessment, give
contraindicated fluids or unsafe discharge. This is Expert Verified A+ rationale for 2026/2027 HESI final. 80-120
words focus.


2. [NSG223-E3-Q2] Ms. Patel, 72yo admitted with Pancreatitis acute chronic. Assessment: BP
110/70, HR 48, RR 16, Hgb 7 g/dL, admitted 2026. The nurse notes new changes. Which is the
priority action?
A. Place patient supine and give fluids rapidly – contraindicated in this condition.
B. Priority for Pancreatitis acute chronic: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI – e.g.,
for HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated.
C. Delegate assessment to UAP – assessment is RN responsibility per HESI.
D. Document and continue monitoring without action – fails to rescue.

Rationale: Correct B. In NSG 223 Med Surg 2, Pancreatitis acute chronic is high-yield HESI final content. For
Ms. Patel, 72yo with BP 110/70, HR 48, RR 16, priority is ABCs, early recognition of deterioration. Priority for
Pancreatitis acute chronic: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI – e.g., for HF give
O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated. Rational: Pancreatitis acute chronic requires specific protocol
– e.g., MI needs MONA adapted, HF needs O2/diuretics/monitor I&O;, COPD needs pursed-lip, chest tube
needs occlusive dressing if dislodged. Why others wrong: they delay care, delegate RN assessment, give
contraindicated fluids or unsafe discharge. This is Expert Verified A+ rationale for 2026/2027 HESI final. 80-120
words focus.


3. [NSG223-E3-Q3] Ms. Patel, 72yo admitted with Acute kidney injury. Assessment: Temp
101.8F, WBC 14.2, HR 110, Hgb 8 g/dL, admitted 2026. The nurse notes new changes. Which is
the priority action?
A. Administer PRN pain med and recheck in 1 hour – delays priority ABCs.
B. Place patient supine and give fluids rapidly – contraindicated in this condition.
C. Priority for Acute kidney injury: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI – e.g., for HF
give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated.
D. Give potassium supplement without checking labs – unsafe.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
12 oktober 2026
Aantal pagina's
85
Geschreven in
2026/2027
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden
$15.99

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
GradeAchiver
2.3
(4)
Verkocht
40
Volgers
2
Items
3451
Laatst verkocht
1 dag geleden




Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen