• Wrong document? Swap it for free
  • Written by students who passed
  • Immediately available after payment
  • Read online or as PDF
Sell
Where do you study
Your language
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 85 pages
Exam (elaborations)

NSG 223 Med Surg 2 HESI Final Exam Neuro, Musculoskeletal & Oncology Stroke, Seizures, Fractures, Chemo Herzing University NSG 223 – Med Surg 2 – HESI Final – Exam 4 A+ VERIFIED | Expert Verified | Latest Update 2026/2027 | Just Released

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 85 pages

NSG 223 MED SURG 2 – Exam 4: Neuro, MS & Oncology – HESI FINAL – 2026/2027 – Herzing 210 Q&A – Expert Verified – A+ Graded Master neuro assessment and oncology emergencies! Topics: Ischemic vs Hemorrhagic Stroke – tPA window 4.5hr, FAST, Seizures – status epilepticus – lorazepam first, Increased ICP – Cushing's triad, avoid suctioning, Spinal cord injury – autonomic dysreflexia, Fractures – compartment syndrome – 6 Ps pain out of proportion, Fat embolism, Amputation – phantom pain, Oncology – Leukemia, Lymphoma, Chemotherapy – extravasation – stop infusion, neutropenia – reverse isolation, tumor lysis syndrome. HESI Focus: Safety, neuro checks, when to notify provider, delegation. Format: [NSG223-E4-Q1] to [NSG223-E4-Q210] unique patient scenarios – Mr. Thompson 45yo with stroke – Mrs. Kim 61yo chemo – no duplication within exam and across bundle. 100+ pages – TOC unique – Yellow rationales – Pass Guaranteed

Content preview

, STUVIA EXAM LIBRARY
EXAMINATION DOCUMENT 2026/2027

NSG 223 Med Surg 2 HESI Final Exam -
Neuro, Musculoskeletal & Oncology –
Stroke, Seizures, Fractures, Chemo
Herzing University NSG 223 – Med Surg 2 – HESI Final – Exam 4
A+ VERIFIED | Expert Verified | Latest Update 2026/2027 | Just Released

, TABLE OF CONTENTS - Exam 4: Neuro,
Musculoskeletal & Oncology – Stroke,
Seizures, Fractures, Chemo
Section 1: Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke (Q1-42)
Section 2: Seizures and status epilepticus (Q27-68)
Section 3: Increased intracranial pressure (Q53-94)
Section 4: Spinal cord injury (Q79-120)
Section 5: Fractures compartment syndrome (Q105-146)
Section 6: Amputation care (Q131-172)
Section 7: Leukemia lymphoma (Q157-198)
Section 8: Chemotherapy extravasation and neutropenia (Q183-210)
Answer Key Summary – Last Page

, 1. [NSG223-E4-Q1] Ms. Patel, 72yo admitted with Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke.
Assessment: BP 92/58, HR 118, RR 24, O2 88%, Hgb 2 g/dL, admitted 2026. The nurse notes
new changes. Which is the priority action?
A. Give potassium supplement without checking labs – unsafe.
B. Administer PRN pain med and recheck in 1 hour – delays priority ABCs.
C. Place patient supine and give fluids rapidly – contraindicated in this condition.
D. Priority for Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI
– e.g., for HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated.

Rationale: Correct D. In NSG 223 Med Surg 2, Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke is high-yield HESI final content.
For Ms. Patel, 72yo with BP 92/58, HR 118, RR 24, O2 88%, priority is ABCs, early recognition of deterioration.
Priority for Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI –
e.g., for HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated. Rational: Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke
requires specific protocol – e.g., MI needs MONA adapted, HF needs O2/diuretics/monitor I&O;, COPD needs
pursed-lip, chest tube needs occlusive dressing if dislodged. Why others wrong: they delay care, delegate RN
assessment, give contraindicated fluids or unsafe discharge. This is Expert Verified A+ rationale for 2026/2027
HESI final. 80-120 words focus.


2. [NSG223-E4-Q2] Mr. Davis, 58yo admitted with Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke.
Assessment: Temp 101.8F, WBC 14.2, HR 110, Hgb 4 g/dL, admitted 2026. The nurse notes
new changes. Which is the priority action?
A. Give potassium supplement without checking labs – unsafe.
B. Delegate assessment to UAP – assessment is RN responsibility per HESI.
C. Administer PRN pain med and recheck in 1 hour – delays priority ABCs.
D. Priority for Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI
– e.g., for HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated.

Rationale: Correct D. In NSG 223 Med Surg 2, Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke is high-yield HESI final content.
For Mr. Davis, 58yo with Temp 101.8F, WBC 14.2, HR 110, priority is ABCs, early recognition of deterioration.
Priority for Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI –
e.g., for HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated. Rational: Ischemic vs hemorrhagic stroke
requires specific protocol – e.g., MI needs MONA adapted, HF needs O2/diuretics/monitor I&O;, COPD needs
pursed-lip, chest tube needs occlusive dressing if dislodged. Why others wrong: they delay care, delegate RN
assessment, give contraindicated fluids or unsafe discharge. This is Expert Verified A+ rationale for 2026/2027
HESI final. 80-120 words focus.


3. [NSG223-E4-Q3] Mr. Davis, 58yo admitted with Increased intracranial pressure.
Assessment: BP 168/102, HR 92, RR 20, K+ 5.8, Hgb 12 g/dL, admitted 2026. The nurse notes
new changes. Which is the priority action?
A. Priority for Increased intracranial pressure: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI –
e.g., for HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated.
B. Place patient supine and give fluids rapidly – contraindicated in this condition.
C. Give potassium supplement without checking labs – unsafe.
D. Discharge patient home with education – unsafe with current vitals.

Document information

Uploaded on
October 12, 2026
Number of pages
85
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$16.49

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
GradeAchiver
2.3
(4)
Sold
40
Followers
2
Items
3451
Last sold
1 day ago




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions