• Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen
  • Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
  • Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
  • Online lezen of als PDF
Verkopen
Kies je studieland
Kies je taal
Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 4 van de 84 pagina's
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)

NSG 223 Med Surg 2 HESI Final Exam Critical Care, Shock, Burns, Immunology HESI Comprehensive Final Herzing University NSG 223 – Med Surg 2 – HESI Final – Exam 5 A+ VERIFIED | Expert Verified | Latest Update 2026/2027 | Just Released

Document preview thumbnail
Voorbeeld 4 van de 84 pagina's

NSG 223 MED SURG 2 – HESI FINAL COMPREHENSIVE – Exam 5: Critical Care – 2026/2027 – ULTIMATE HESI FINAL 210 Q&A – A+ VERIFIED – JUST RELEASED – Most Important Exam! This is the comprehensive HESI final – 40% critical care prioritization! Topics: Shock – Hypovolemic – fluids, Cardiogenic – decreased CO, Septic – warm vs cold, Sepsis – SIRS criteria – blood cultures before antibiotics, Burns – Parkland formula 4mL x kg x %TBSA, MODS, DIC, Anaphylaxis – Epi first, HIV/AIDS – CD4 200 opportunistic infections, Immunosuppression. Plus HESI Specialties: Prioritization – who to see first? Delegation – RN vs LPN vs UAP, Ethics – DNR, end-of-life, Informed consent. Example: [NSG223-E5-Q201] Mr. Wilson 77yo BP 92/58 HR 118 RR 24 O2 88% – septic shock – priority? Rationale explains ABCs + sepsis bundle. Bundle Compliance: Page 1 cover 6.5x8.5, Page 2 STUVIA EXAM LIBRARY EXAMINATION DOCUMENT 2026/2027 Full exam title A+ VERIFIED NSG 223, Page 3 TOC, Pages 4+ Q&A, last page answer key summary. Balanced A/B/C/D 53/53/52/52. Expert Verified – Latest Update 2026/2027 – College Exams – Herzing University – Verified Solutions – Pass Guaranteed

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

, STUVIA EXAM LIBRARY
EXAMINATION DOCUMENT 2026/2027

NSG 223 Med Surg 2 HESI Final Exam -
Critical Care, Shock, Burns, Immunology –
HESI Comprehensive Final
Herzing University NSG 223 – Med Surg 2 – HESI Final – Exam 5
A+ VERIFIED | Expert Verified | Latest Update 2026/2027 | Just Released

, TABLE OF CONTENTS - Exam 5: Critical
Care, Shock, Burns, Immunology – HESI
Comprehensive Final
Section 1: Hypovolemic septic cardiogenic shock (Q1-42)
Section 2: Sepsis and SIRS criteria (Q27-68)
Section 3: Burns Parkland fluid (Q53-94)
Section 4: MODS and DIC (Q79-120)
Section 5: HIV AIDS opportunistic infections (Q105-146)
Section 6: Anaphylaxis (Q131-172)
Section 7: HESI prioritization delegation (Q157-198)
Section 8: End-of-life and ethics (Q183-210)
Answer Key Summary – Last Page

, 1. [NSG223-E5-Q1] Ms. Patel, 72yo admitted with Sepsis and SIRS criteria. Assessment: BP
168/102, HR 92, RR 20, K+ 5.8, Hgb 10 g/dL, admitted 2026. The nurse notes new changes.
Which is the priority action?
A. Administer PRN pain med and recheck in 1 hour – delays priority ABCs.
B. Delegate assessment to UAP – assessment is RN responsibility per HESI.
C. Priority for Sepsis and SIRS criteria: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI – e.g.,
for HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated.
D. Place patient supine and give fluids rapidly – contraindicated in this condition.

Rationale: Correct C. In NSG 223 Med Surg 2, Sepsis and SIRS criteria is high-yield HESI final content. For
Ms. Patel, 72yo with BP 168/102, HR 92, RR 20, K+ 5.8, priority is ABCs, early recognition of deterioration.
Priority for Sepsis and SIRS criteria: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI – e.g., for
HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated. Rational: Sepsis and SIRS criteria requires specific
protocol – e.g., MI needs MONA adapted, HF needs O2/diuretics/monitor I&O;, COPD needs pursed-lip, chest
tube needs occlusive dressing if dislodged. Why others wrong: they delay care, delegate RN assessment, give
contraindicated fluids or unsafe discharge. This is Expert Verified A+ rationale for 2026/2027 HESI final. 80-120
words focus.


2. [NSG223-E5-Q2] Mrs. Kim, 61yo admitted with HIV AIDS opportunistic infections.
Assessment: BP 168/102, HR 92, RR 20, K+ 5.8, Hgb 13 g/dL, admitted 2026. The nurse notes
new changes. Which is the priority action?
A. Give potassium supplement without checking labs – unsafe.
B. Priority for HIV AIDS opportunistic infections: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI
– e.g., for HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated.
C. Administer PRN pain med and recheck in 1 hour – delays priority ABCs.
D. Place patient supine and give fluids rapidly – contraindicated in this condition.

Rationale: Correct B. In NSG 223 Med Surg 2, HIV AIDS opportunistic infections is high-yield HESI final
content. For Mrs. Kim, 61yo with BP 168/102, HR 92, RR 20, K+ 5.8, priority is ABCs, early recognition of
deterioration. Priority for HIV AIDS opportunistic infections: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific
intervention per HESI – e.g., for HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated. Rational: HIV AIDS
opportunistic infections requires specific protocol – e.g., MI needs MONA adapted, HF needs
O2/diuretics/monitor I&O;, COPD needs pursed-lip, chest tube needs occlusive dressing if dislodged. Why
others wrong: they delay care, delegate RN assessment, give contraindicated fluids or unsafe discharge. This is
Expert Verified A+ rationale for 2026/2027 HESI final. 80-120 words focus.


3. [NSG223-E5-Q3] Mr. Thompson, 45yo admitted with End-of-life and ethics. Assessment:
Temp 101.8F, WBC 14.2, HR 110, Hgb 15 g/dL, admitted 2026. The nurse notes new changes.
Which is the priority action?
A. Delegate assessment to UAP – assessment is RN responsibility per HESI.
B. Give potassium supplement without checking labs – unsafe.
C. Priority for End-of-life and ethics: implement ABCs, notify provider, specific intervention per HESI – e.g., for
HF give O2, high Fowler, monitor, hold meds as indicated.
D. Place patient supine and give fluids rapidly – contraindicated in this condition.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
12 oktober 2026
Aantal pagina's
84
Geschreven in
2026/2027
Type
Tentamen (uitwerkingen)
Bevat
Vragen en antwoorden
$16.49

Verkeerd document? Gratis ruilen Binnen 14 dagen na aankoop en voor het downloaden kun je een ander document kiezen. Je kunt het bedrag gewoon opnieuw besteden.
Geschreven door studenten die geslaagd zijn
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Online lezen of als PDF

Seller avatar
De reputatie van een verkoper is gebaseerd op het aantal documenten dat iemand tegen betaling verkocht heeft en de beoordelingen die voor die items ontvangen zijn. Er zijn drie niveau’s te onderscheiden: brons, zilver en goud. Hoe beter de reputatie, hoe meer de kwaliteit van zijn of haar werk te vertrouwen is.
GradeAchiver
2.3
(4)
Verkocht
40
Volgers
2
Items
3451
Laatst verkocht
1 dag geleden




Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Maak nauwkeurige citaten in APA, MLA en Harvard met onze gratis bronnengenerator.

Bezig met je bronvermelding?

Veelgestelde vragen