and other assessment tools to gather data on an individual's cognitive, social, and
behavioral functioning for the purpose of description, classification, prediction, and
intervention
Examiner Qualifications -Level A: may be administered and interpreted by a non-psychologist
-Level B: require some technical knowledge of test construction and use, as well as
completion of supporting educational and psychological subjects
-Level C: should be administered only by individuals with at least an MA in
psychology and at least one year of supervised experience under a psychologist
Reliability vs Validity -Reliability: degree to which test scores are free from the effects of measurement
error
Validity: degree to which a test measures what it was designed to measure
Standardization -The examinee's responses, the apparatus, and the scoring have been fixed so the
scores collected at different times and places are fully comparable; any deviations
from standardized administration and scoring may result in invalid conclusions
-The test has been administered under standard conditions to a representative
sample for the purpose of establishing norms; the greater the discrepancy between
the examinee and the norm group, the less likely the test results will be valid
Types of Scoring -Norm-Referenced: comparison between an examinee's scores and the scores of
the norm group; percentile ranks, standard scores
-Criterion-Referenced: domain or content referenced; scores based on what the
examinee can do or knows with regard to clearly defined content; percent correct
-Self-Referenced: ipsative; intra-individual comparison of scores; relative strengths
or weaknesses
Behavioral Assessment -Focuses on overt and covert behaviors that occur in specific circumstances
-May utilize behavioral interviews, observation, cognitive assessment, or
psychophysiological measures
-Functional behavioral assessment (FBA): determines the purpose of a behavior by
identifying antecedents and consequences
Dynamic Assessment -Interactive approach and deliberate deviation from standardized procedures to
obtain additional information about the examinee
-Associated with educational assessment
-Testing the limits: involves providing examinees with additional cues, suggestions,
or feedback; ordinarily done after standardized administration
-Graduated prompting: giving the examinee a series of verbal prompts that are
graduated in terms of difficulty level
-Test-teach-retest: following the initial assessment with an intervention designed to
modify the examinee's performance, then re-assessing
Computer-Assisted Assessment -Computer Adaptive Testing (CAT): computer tailors the test to an individual
examinee by choosing subsequent items based on previous answers
-Increases precision and efficacy, as all examinees are tested with the same degree
of reliability and reduced testing time
-Computer-based interpretations should not be used to replaced clinical judgement
Actuarial vs Clinical Predictions -Actuarial: statistical; based on empirically validated relationship between test
results and specific criteria
-Clinical: based on the decision-maker's intuition, experience, and knowledge;
clinical judgement
-Research has found that actuarial method alone is more accurate than clinical
judgement alone
, Assessing Children -Interviews can be used to obtain reliable and valid data from children as young as
6
-Goals include establishing rapport and maintaining the child's cooperation, and can
be accomplished by using descriptive statements, reflections, and open-ended
questions; providing labeled praise; and avoiding critical statements and leading
questions
Assessing Members of Culturally Diverse Populations -Considerations include acculturation, identity, language proficiency, availability of
appropriate norms, cultural equivalence of content measured by the test, and
availability of more culturally appropriate alternatives
-There are no truly culture-fair or culture-free tests
-Research has found no consistent effect of match or mismatch between examiner
and examinee in terms of race, ethnicity, or culture
Self-Report -One of the most common data collection methods
-Advantages include quick production and scoring, and low cost
-Disadvantages can include weaker reliability and validity
Multi-Informant Report -Advantages include increased information about the client
-Disadvantages can include inconsistency in reports across various informants
Psychophysiological Measures -Used to observe physiological functions which can often describe the emotional
state of an individual
-Advantages include ability to analyze momentary experiences without intervening
in the interaction while it occurs
-Disadvantages can include monetary expense and that not every momentary
experience may be important
Direct Observation -Observational study; method of collecting evaluative information in which the
evaluator watches the participant in their usual environment to evaluate ongoing
behavior processes; can be overt or covert
-Structured: most appropriate when standardized information needs to be gathered
and results in quantitative data
-Unstructured: provides qualitative data
-Disadvantages can include participant and observer bias
Structured vs Unstructured Interview -Structured: fixed set of close questions; easier to replicate and test for reliability;
not as flexible and answers may lack detail
-Unstructured: more flexible; questions can be adapted as needed; generate a lot of
qualitative data; time consuming; interviewers need more training
Spearman's Two-Factor Theory of Intelligence -Proposed a general intellectual factor (g)
-Argued that performance on any cognitive task depends on g plus one or more
specific factors (s) unique to the task
Horn and Cattell's Fluid and Crystallized Intelligence Crystallized (Gc): acquired knowledge and skills; affected by educational and
cultural experiences; includes reading, numerical skill, and factual knowledge
Fluid (Gf): enables individuals to solve novel problems and perceive relations and
similarities; does not depend on specific instruction; relatively culture-free
-Crystalized intelligence increases until ~age 60, while fluid intelligence peaks in
late adolescence and then declines (related to declines in working memory and
processing speed)