Basics of evolution
- What’s happening to the genetic makeup of a population over time?
o Evolution is not a linear process
o It is the change in generations over time
- Changes are driven by selective pressure
o Different form one population to another
o Can be different within one population’s time
- Evolution occurs for different generations at different rates
- Society typically depicts evolution as such
o ABCD
- However, it looks more along the lines of
o A
o B C
o D E F G
“Species F” could go instinct, any of them could
Because of selective pressure
During some time periods, large numbers of species could go
extinct because of a large amount of selective pressure (mass
extinctions)
Darwin’s work
- Darwin saw this pattern of evolution
- This was not a common belief of the time
o People were put to death for speaking of “evolution” and “biology” in
these ways
o People mainly believed in creationism
Creationism says that all the organisms that are here were
created in the way they are now and will never change
they will remain constant
once it comes into existence, that’s the way it will forever
be
some also believed that organisms will slightly change over
time, but it would look more like this
ABCD
A1
A2 B2
People accepted this because although some change is
occurring, it is mostly creation of another organism
- It is irrefutable that the genetic makeup organisms have slowly changed
over time as the world around has changed
- Why was this controversial?
o They had taught creationism for so long
o It was society’s dogma at the time
, o People (mainly biologist/scientist) at the time did not want to accept
that they were wrong
- Also competed with other hypotheses at the time
o Darwin’s view on evolution was not the only
o Lamarck had a view as well
Followed more of the linear idea
Lamarck’s Work
- Believed the change/evolution was driven by the organism itself striving to
become better and fit with nature better
o Rather than nature effecting the organism
- Scientists liked this idea of thinking because they liked the idea that each
organism was striving to be the best it could be
o Man was the most evolved
o Man was the highest and above all the other organisms
- Very accepted view
- However, there is no internal force that drives evolution
o External forces drive it
- Ex:
o It’s like saying a father who loses a finger due to an accident, will give
birth to children without that same finger
- Only very slightly true
o Genetic changes that occur in the cells can be passed onto offspring
o However, it would not be something like a finger being lost
- Some genetic changes make the future offspring more adapt
o Good change = more likely to be passed on
- Some genetic changes make no difference
o It’s still change, but makes no difference
o May get passed on, may not
- Some genetic change is bad
o Weeds out these organisms if it affects the organism’s ability to
reproduce
o However (speaking for humans) if it only lowers the organism’s life, it
will not likely affect that specific chain of organisms
Humans get their reproduction done earlier on in life
Catastrophism and Uniformitarianism (a.k.a gradualism)
- Ideas came from geology
- Gradualism
o The gradual and slow changes happen over very, very long periods of
time
o However, over a long enough period of time, it amounts to a big
change
- Big changes can be produced, just over long periods of time
- Flip side Catastrophism
, o Huge changes that happen all at once
Volcanic eruptions
Tidal waves
- Goes hand in hand with evolution
o Mutations
o Happens one nucleotide at a time
o Slow mutations through nucleotides that are passed down through
generation after generation will result in a big change gradualism
- Gradualism can also have evolution repercussions
Natural Selection
- The pressure of nature which decides who’s going to be successful and who
isn’t
- Basically, mother nature putting a cap on an organism’s population’s growth
o Causes it to stabilize
- The organisms who do not start to stabilize outrun their resources and their
population crashes
o Forces them to either start over again, or go extinct
- Human population is reaching that point
o We have found ways to sidestep the natural selective ways
o Medicine
o Kill off predators
o Etc.
However, we can’t do that forever
We do not know if our population will crash or stabilize
You cannot grow as a population completely unchecked forever
Evidence of evolution
- We go back to look for:
o Were there catastrophic changes in DNA?
o Are there point mutations that accumulate over time that occur in a
change in genes of a population?
o What was the selective pressure of the time?
- This has no bearing for what will happen in the future
- We can study evolution in a backwards view, not in a forward’s view
o we do not know what genetic changes are coming
o or what natural selective changes will occur
- evolution will never be a predictive science
- fossil evidence is evidence of evolution
o however, fossil evidence is only as good as what you can find
o most environments are not conducive to producing fossils
o there must be very specific conditions met to preserve a bone
and then it must survive that preservation
o there is a finite amount
o only a snapshot of existence at the time
, Other lines of evidence:
Comparative anatomy
- What does this fossil look like compared to this other fossil?
- What does this living thing look like compared to this living thing?
o Picking organisms that seem to represent their population the
greatest
- Quantify differences that amount to anatomical differences
o How big
o How long
o How many teeth
o How many limbs
o Etc.
o All quantifiable, more statistical approach to the evolution
Convergent evolution
- Structures that are remarkably similar in two different organisms that the
population has evolved into due to similar selective pressure
o Flying squirrels and sugar gliders
o Different organisms
o No where near related
o Similar structures to avoid predators
- Structures have evolved in populations to allow populations to survive better
o Forming traits (more aerodynamic bodies to avoid predators) that
allows them to survive
o Might affect two difference lineages due to two different populations
having the same issue
- Allows us to look outside of just the anatomical traits to see why that
organism has evolved
- Must look at all different sources to study evolution
- Flip side: homologous structures
Homologous structures
- Two structures that might look very and different and do very different
things, but upon close studying it can be discovered that they may have
come from similar origin
- A dolphin's flipper, a bird's wing, a cat's leg, and a human arm are
considered homologous structures
Vestigial structures
- Some anatomical structures will evolve out of existence
o Whales have a pelvis where its hind legs use to attach
The pelvis serves no real purpose
However, remnants are still there
o We have an appendix, remnants of our ancestral origins
- What’s happening to the genetic makeup of a population over time?
o Evolution is not a linear process
o It is the change in generations over time
- Changes are driven by selective pressure
o Different form one population to another
o Can be different within one population’s time
- Evolution occurs for different generations at different rates
- Society typically depicts evolution as such
o ABCD
- However, it looks more along the lines of
o A
o B C
o D E F G
“Species F” could go instinct, any of them could
Because of selective pressure
During some time periods, large numbers of species could go
extinct because of a large amount of selective pressure (mass
extinctions)
Darwin’s work
- Darwin saw this pattern of evolution
- This was not a common belief of the time
o People were put to death for speaking of “evolution” and “biology” in
these ways
o People mainly believed in creationism
Creationism says that all the organisms that are here were
created in the way they are now and will never change
they will remain constant
once it comes into existence, that’s the way it will forever
be
some also believed that organisms will slightly change over
time, but it would look more like this
ABCD
A1
A2 B2
People accepted this because although some change is
occurring, it is mostly creation of another organism
- It is irrefutable that the genetic makeup organisms have slowly changed
over time as the world around has changed
- Why was this controversial?
o They had taught creationism for so long
o It was society’s dogma at the time
, o People (mainly biologist/scientist) at the time did not want to accept
that they were wrong
- Also competed with other hypotheses at the time
o Darwin’s view on evolution was not the only
o Lamarck had a view as well
Followed more of the linear idea
Lamarck’s Work
- Believed the change/evolution was driven by the organism itself striving to
become better and fit with nature better
o Rather than nature effecting the organism
- Scientists liked this idea of thinking because they liked the idea that each
organism was striving to be the best it could be
o Man was the most evolved
o Man was the highest and above all the other organisms
- Very accepted view
- However, there is no internal force that drives evolution
o External forces drive it
- Ex:
o It’s like saying a father who loses a finger due to an accident, will give
birth to children without that same finger
- Only very slightly true
o Genetic changes that occur in the cells can be passed onto offspring
o However, it would not be something like a finger being lost
- Some genetic changes make the future offspring more adapt
o Good change = more likely to be passed on
- Some genetic changes make no difference
o It’s still change, but makes no difference
o May get passed on, may not
- Some genetic change is bad
o Weeds out these organisms if it affects the organism’s ability to
reproduce
o However (speaking for humans) if it only lowers the organism’s life, it
will not likely affect that specific chain of organisms
Humans get their reproduction done earlier on in life
Catastrophism and Uniformitarianism (a.k.a gradualism)
- Ideas came from geology
- Gradualism
o The gradual and slow changes happen over very, very long periods of
time
o However, over a long enough period of time, it amounts to a big
change
- Big changes can be produced, just over long periods of time
- Flip side Catastrophism
, o Huge changes that happen all at once
Volcanic eruptions
Tidal waves
- Goes hand in hand with evolution
o Mutations
o Happens one nucleotide at a time
o Slow mutations through nucleotides that are passed down through
generation after generation will result in a big change gradualism
- Gradualism can also have evolution repercussions
Natural Selection
- The pressure of nature which decides who’s going to be successful and who
isn’t
- Basically, mother nature putting a cap on an organism’s population’s growth
o Causes it to stabilize
- The organisms who do not start to stabilize outrun their resources and their
population crashes
o Forces them to either start over again, or go extinct
- Human population is reaching that point
o We have found ways to sidestep the natural selective ways
o Medicine
o Kill off predators
o Etc.
However, we can’t do that forever
We do not know if our population will crash or stabilize
You cannot grow as a population completely unchecked forever
Evidence of evolution
- We go back to look for:
o Were there catastrophic changes in DNA?
o Are there point mutations that accumulate over time that occur in a
change in genes of a population?
o What was the selective pressure of the time?
- This has no bearing for what will happen in the future
- We can study evolution in a backwards view, not in a forward’s view
o we do not know what genetic changes are coming
o or what natural selective changes will occur
- evolution will never be a predictive science
- fossil evidence is evidence of evolution
o however, fossil evidence is only as good as what you can find
o most environments are not conducive to producing fossils
o there must be very specific conditions met to preserve a bone
and then it must survive that preservation
o there is a finite amount
o only a snapshot of existence at the time
, Other lines of evidence:
Comparative anatomy
- What does this fossil look like compared to this other fossil?
- What does this living thing look like compared to this living thing?
o Picking organisms that seem to represent their population the
greatest
- Quantify differences that amount to anatomical differences
o How big
o How long
o How many teeth
o How many limbs
o Etc.
o All quantifiable, more statistical approach to the evolution
Convergent evolution
- Structures that are remarkably similar in two different organisms that the
population has evolved into due to similar selective pressure
o Flying squirrels and sugar gliders
o Different organisms
o No where near related
o Similar structures to avoid predators
- Structures have evolved in populations to allow populations to survive better
o Forming traits (more aerodynamic bodies to avoid predators) that
allows them to survive
o Might affect two difference lineages due to two different populations
having the same issue
- Allows us to look outside of just the anatomical traits to see why that
organism has evolved
- Must look at all different sources to study evolution
- Flip side: homologous structures
Homologous structures
- Two structures that might look very and different and do very different
things, but upon close studying it can be discovered that they may have
come from similar origin
- A dolphin's flipper, a bird's wing, a cat's leg, and a human arm are
considered homologous structures
Vestigial structures
- Some anatomical structures will evolve out of existence
o Whales have a pelvis where its hind legs use to attach
The pelvis serves no real purpose
However, remnants are still there
o We have an appendix, remnants of our ancestral origins