PEDIATRIC ARTICULATION
& PHONOLOGY
Clinical Simulation Practice
20 Complete SLP Cases with Clinical Decisions, Answers & Detailed Rationales
CASES DECISIONS FOCUS
20 80 Pediatric SLP
case history • speech sample • assessment interpretation • diagnosis • treatment selection •
generalization
PASSPOINT PRO
Practice smarter. Prepare better.
,PASSPOINT PRO | SLP CLINICAL SIMULATION PEDIATRIC ARTICULATION & PHONOLOGY
HOW TO USE THIS PRACTICE SET
Original pediatric speech sound disorder simulations
Structure Each case presents a brief history, speech sample, assessment snapshot, clinical
impression, and four decision points. Select an answer before reading the rationale.
Clinical focus The cases cover developmental and atypical phonological patterns, articulation
distortions, differential diagnosis, bilingual assessment, hearing considerations, motor
speech red flags, resonance/structural factors, and treatment planning.
Practice goal Use the rationales to strengthen pattern recognition and clinical reasoning. These are
original educational cases and do not reproduce proprietary test items or simulation
scripts.
QUICK PATTERN REVIEW
Final consonant deletion Final consonant omitted: cat -> ca
Fronting Velar replaced by alveolar: key -> tea
Stopping Fricative/affricate replaced by stop: sun -> tun
Cluster reduction One or more consonants omitted from cluster: spoon -> poon
Gliding Liquid replaced by glide: rabbit -> wabbit
Weak syllable deletion Unstressed syllable omitted: banana -> nana
Assimilation One sound becomes more like another within the word
Backing Front sound replaced by back sound - atypical
Initial consonant deletion Word-initial consonant omitted - atypical
Phoneme collapse Several targets map to one substitute sound
20 Complete Pediatric Speech Sound Disorder Cases | Answers & Rationales 2
,PASSPOINT PRO | SLP CLINICAL SIMULATION PEDIATRIC ARTICULATION & PHONOLOGY
CASE 1: MAYA
Final consonant deletion
Client Maya Age 3 years 8 months
Primary Family reports that many words Setting Preschool referral
concern sound "unfinished" and unfamiliar
listeners understand less than half of
her speech.
Case history Hearing screening passed. Oral mechanism is within expected limits. Receptive and
expressive language appear age appropriate.
Speech sample "ca" for cat, "bee" for bead, "hou" for house, "fi" for fish, "bu" for bus.
Assessment Single-word and connected-speech samples show frequent omission of word-final
snapshot consonants across stops, fricatives, and nasals. Errors are systematic rather than
isolated to one sound.
Clinical impression Phonological speech sound disorder characterized primarily by final consonant
deletion.
Recommended Use contrastive practice that highlights word-final meaning differences; begin with
direction high-success final consonants in functional words and monitor generalization to
phrases.
CLINICAL DECISIONS
Question 1
Which phonological pattern best explains Maya's speech sample?
A Fronting
B Final consonant deletion
C Gliding
D Stopping
Answer: B - Final consonant deletion
Rationale: Maya consistently omits consonants at the ends of words, as in "ca" for cat and "hou" for house.
The pattern affects multiple consonant classes, which supports a phonological pattern rather than a
single-sound articulation error.
20 Complete Pediatric Speech Sound Disorder Cases | Answers & Rationales 3
, PASSPOINT PRO | SLP CLINICAL SIMULATION PEDIATRIC ARTICULATION & PHONOLOGY
Question 2
What is the most useful next assessment step before treatment planning?
A Collect a connected-speech sample to estimate consistency and intelligibility
B Test only isolated /s/ production
C Begin oral-motor strengthening without further assessment
D Delay assessment until kindergarten
Answer: A - Collect a connected-speech sample to estimate consistency and intelligibility
Rationale: A connected-speech sample shows how often the pattern occurs in natural communication and
helps estimate functional intelligibility. Isolated sound testing alone would not capture the impact of final
consonant deletion across words and phrases.
Question 3
Which early treatment target is most appropriate?
A Contrast words that differ by a final consonant, such as "bee" vs. "beep"
B Practice only multisyllabic words with /r/
C Teach vocal loudness drills
D Target reading comprehension
Answer: A - Contrast words that differ by a final consonant
Rationale: Minimal or meaningful contrasts can show Maya that omitting a final consonant changes
meaning. Starting with functional, stimulable final consonants supports success and generalization.
Question 4
Which outcome would best indicate early generalization?
A Maya names one trained picture correctly in isolation
B Maya produces final consonants in untrained words during short phrases
C Maya can identify letters of the alphabet
D Maya speaks more loudly
Answer: B - Maya produces final consonants in untrained words during short phrases
Rationale: Generalization is demonstrated when the new pattern appears beyond directly trained items.
Accurate final consonants in untrained words and phrases indicate that learning is spreading to functional
speech.
20 Complete Pediatric Speech Sound Disorder Cases | Answers & Rationales 4