BA 300 FINAL SDSU NAIDA EXAM 2026 UPDATE
QUESTIONS AND CORRECT VERIFIED ANSWERS
ALREADY GRADED A+ (BRAND NEW VISION)
Ethics of Care - ANS-focuses on relationships and responsibilities
Ethics of Care Pro - ANS-protects the weak and dependent- could be temporary and you could
have offered it
Ethics of Care Con - ANS-neglects justice- example) someone did something wrong and you
help them through it but u could be enabling them
Ethics of Care example - ANS-usually a small business and has the business to not be solely
based on profiting- Teachers dentist has limited hours so he can surf and focus on his family
Integrative Social Contracts Theory - ANS-action doesn't violate a global hypernorm or local
authentic norm - tailored to global business, respecting dignity and human rights
Integrative Social Contracts Theory Pro - ANS-adapts to variations in local norms within some
global limits
Integrative Social Contracts Theory Con - ANS-local norms are vague and may give actors-too
much flexibility
Integrative Social Contracts Theory Example - ANS-Levis underage workers in Bangladesh- paid
for their school until they were of working age
, Corporations the Fundamentals - ANS-legal entity chartered by the state with rights and
responsibilities apart from the persons running or working for the corporations
Shareholder Perspective - ANS-maximize profits within the law and morality
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) - - ANS-advance the interests of all stakeholders (even at
the expense of profits)
Stakeholder Theory
ANS-commitment to corporate actions beyond maximizing profits within the law and morality
Instrumental/Strategic - ANS-•How corporations should engage in CSR programs in order to
maximize profits within legal and moral constraints
Normative CSR - ANS-•How corporations should engage in CSR programs because it's the right
or moral thing to do, even at the expense of profits
Arguments against Normative CSR - ANS-•Violates owners' property rights
•Presumes that managers have better moral skills than shareholders
•Weakens management's accountability to shareholders
•Distracts management from its primary purpose
A Key CSR Distinction - ANS-•Repair externalities/"do no harm," but not responsible for
general social problems
Advance the common good,
Shareholder Theory: Ethical Justifications - ANS-•Powerful corporations can help alleviate
global inequalities
QUESTIONS AND CORRECT VERIFIED ANSWERS
ALREADY GRADED A+ (BRAND NEW VISION)
Ethics of Care - ANS-focuses on relationships and responsibilities
Ethics of Care Pro - ANS-protects the weak and dependent- could be temporary and you could
have offered it
Ethics of Care Con - ANS-neglects justice- example) someone did something wrong and you
help them through it but u could be enabling them
Ethics of Care example - ANS-usually a small business and has the business to not be solely
based on profiting- Teachers dentist has limited hours so he can surf and focus on his family
Integrative Social Contracts Theory - ANS-action doesn't violate a global hypernorm or local
authentic norm - tailored to global business, respecting dignity and human rights
Integrative Social Contracts Theory Pro - ANS-adapts to variations in local norms within some
global limits
Integrative Social Contracts Theory Con - ANS-local norms are vague and may give actors-too
much flexibility
Integrative Social Contracts Theory Example - ANS-Levis underage workers in Bangladesh- paid
for their school until they were of working age
, Corporations the Fundamentals - ANS-legal entity chartered by the state with rights and
responsibilities apart from the persons running or working for the corporations
Shareholder Perspective - ANS-maximize profits within the law and morality
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) - - ANS-advance the interests of all stakeholders (even at
the expense of profits)
Stakeholder Theory
ANS-commitment to corporate actions beyond maximizing profits within the law and morality
Instrumental/Strategic - ANS-•How corporations should engage in CSR programs in order to
maximize profits within legal and moral constraints
Normative CSR - ANS-•How corporations should engage in CSR programs because it's the right
or moral thing to do, even at the expense of profits
Arguments against Normative CSR - ANS-•Violates owners' property rights
•Presumes that managers have better moral skills than shareholders
•Weakens management's accountability to shareholders
•Distracts management from its primary purpose
A Key CSR Distinction - ANS-•Repair externalities/"do no harm," but not responsible for
general social problems
Advance the common good,
Shareholder Theory: Ethical Justifications - ANS-•Powerful corporations can help alleviate
global inequalities
