Tenzing Khando
AutoGen_bc57541c-e2e3-4c73-8248-
Capella University
Prioritization of Care® v.2 Specialty Series: Geriatric Care
Tenzing, here are your results:
Overview
Click a section’s title to view your latest attempt’s Detailed Feedback.
Section Score
Level of Care Selection 10/10 (100%)
Patient Prioritization 10/10 (100%)
Intervention Selection 40/40 (100%)
Intervention Prioritization 40/40 (100%)
0 10 20 30 40
Completion Score Time Spent Total Time Spent
100% 100% 24m 6h 5m
Complete 100/100 points Last attempt 2 total attempts
Attempt completed at March 25, 2026 at 23:50 (UTC). Report generated on March 25, 2026 at 23:50 (UTC).
All Attempts
Time Level of Care Patient Intervention Intervention
# Start Date Progress Spent Selection Prioritization Selection Prioritization Total Score
#1 2026-03-25 23:24 100% 5h 41m 6/10 0/10 35/40 17/40 58/100 (58%)
#2 2026-03-25 23:50 100% 6h 5m 10/10 10/10 40/40 40/40 100/100 (100%)
Feedback
Please provide product feedback by clicking the “SURVEY” button to the right of
this prompt. Your feedback is important for enhancing user experience and
achievement of outcomes for future learners.
Overview 1
, Tenzing Khando
AutoGen_bc57541c-e2e3-4c73-8248-
Capella University
Alignment to Competencies
AACN Essentials
The simulation meets the following domains from the AACN Essentials:
KNOWLEDGE FOR PERSON-CENTERED
NURSING PRACTICE CARE
VIEW DOMAIN 1 VIEW DOMAIN 2
Portions of these materials are taken from The Essentials: Core Competencies for Nursing Education. (“The Essentials”), which is
owned by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (“AACN”). Any licensing of The Essentials by AACN does not constitute
or imply any endorsement of any company and/or any of its products, services, or written work product. Click here to read the
full disclaimer.
NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model
Each section maps to the NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model (NCJMM).
On the last page of this report, Evaluate Outcomes using the EMPOWER® Debrief.
Recognize Analyze Prioritize Generate Take Evaluate
Cues Cues Hypotheses Solutions Action Outcomes
60% 60% 0% 88% 42% N/A
Maps to Level Maps to Level Maps to Maps to Maps to Maps to
of Care of Care Patient Intervention Intervention EMPOWER®
Selection Selection Prioritization Selection Prioritization Debrief
, Tenzing Khando
AutoGen_bc57541c-e2e3-4c73-8248-
Capella University
Alignment to Competencies
NCLEX Client Needs Categories
Interventions made in this simulation are mapped to one or more Client Needs Categories.
A. Safe and Effective Care Environment D. Physiological Integrity
92% Management of Care 100% Basic Care and Comfort
12 actions map to this subcategory. 2 actions map to this subcategory.
A
A. Safe and Effective Care Environment D. Physiological Integrity
100% Safety and Infection Control 83% Pharmacological and Parenteral Therapies
1 action maps to this subcategory. 6 actions map to this subcategory.
D
B. Health Promotion and Maintenance D. Physiological Integrity
B 94% 18 actions map to this subcategory. 100% Reduction of Risk Potential
2 actions map to this subcategory.
C. Psychosocial Integrity D. Physiological Integrity
C 75% 8 actions map to this subcategory. 91% Physiologic Adaptation
11 actions map to this subcategory.
, Tenzing Khando
AutoGen_bc57541c-e2e3-4c73-8248-
Capella University
Section Summary
Level of Care Selection
Level of Care Score
High 5/5 (100%)
Medium / Low 5/5 (100%)
Level of Care Selection Total 10/10 (100%)
0 5 10
Patient Prioritization
Level of Care Score
High 5/5 (100%)
Medium / Low 5/5 (100%)
Patient Prioritization Total 10/10 (100%)
0 5 10
Intervention Selection
Level of Care Score
High 20/20 (100%)
Medium / Low 20/20 (100%)
Intervention Selection Total 40/40 (100%)
> Intervention Selection Per Patient
100% 4
75% 3
50% 2
25% 1
0% 0
Preston Shiver Joyce Cochran Manuel Akako Ryu Isabell Prestes Anna Lupe Ai Goh Lawrence Ellis Hasina Joseph Dugan
Dejesus Gutema
High Medium / Low
AutoGen_bc57541c-e2e3-4c73-8248-
Capella University
Prioritization of Care® v.2 Specialty Series: Geriatric Care
Tenzing, here are your results:
Overview
Click a section’s title to view your latest attempt’s Detailed Feedback.
Section Score
Level of Care Selection 10/10 (100%)
Patient Prioritization 10/10 (100%)
Intervention Selection 40/40 (100%)
Intervention Prioritization 40/40 (100%)
0 10 20 30 40
Completion Score Time Spent Total Time Spent
100% 100% 24m 6h 5m
Complete 100/100 points Last attempt 2 total attempts
Attempt completed at March 25, 2026 at 23:50 (UTC). Report generated on March 25, 2026 at 23:50 (UTC).
All Attempts
Time Level of Care Patient Intervention Intervention
# Start Date Progress Spent Selection Prioritization Selection Prioritization Total Score
#1 2026-03-25 23:24 100% 5h 41m 6/10 0/10 35/40 17/40 58/100 (58%)
#2 2026-03-25 23:50 100% 6h 5m 10/10 10/10 40/40 40/40 100/100 (100%)
Feedback
Please provide product feedback by clicking the “SURVEY” button to the right of
this prompt. Your feedback is important for enhancing user experience and
achievement of outcomes for future learners.
Overview 1
, Tenzing Khando
AutoGen_bc57541c-e2e3-4c73-8248-
Capella University
Alignment to Competencies
AACN Essentials
The simulation meets the following domains from the AACN Essentials:
KNOWLEDGE FOR PERSON-CENTERED
NURSING PRACTICE CARE
VIEW DOMAIN 1 VIEW DOMAIN 2
Portions of these materials are taken from The Essentials: Core Competencies for Nursing Education. (“The Essentials”), which is
owned by the American Association of Colleges of Nursing (“AACN”). Any licensing of The Essentials by AACN does not constitute
or imply any endorsement of any company and/or any of its products, services, or written work product. Click here to read the
full disclaimer.
NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model
Each section maps to the NCSBN Clinical Judgment Measurement Model (NCJMM).
On the last page of this report, Evaluate Outcomes using the EMPOWER® Debrief.
Recognize Analyze Prioritize Generate Take Evaluate
Cues Cues Hypotheses Solutions Action Outcomes
60% 60% 0% 88% 42% N/A
Maps to Level Maps to Level Maps to Maps to Maps to Maps to
of Care of Care Patient Intervention Intervention EMPOWER®
Selection Selection Prioritization Selection Prioritization Debrief
, Tenzing Khando
AutoGen_bc57541c-e2e3-4c73-8248-
Capella University
Alignment to Competencies
NCLEX Client Needs Categories
Interventions made in this simulation are mapped to one or more Client Needs Categories.
A. Safe and Effective Care Environment D. Physiological Integrity
92% Management of Care 100% Basic Care and Comfort
12 actions map to this subcategory. 2 actions map to this subcategory.
A
A. Safe and Effective Care Environment D. Physiological Integrity
100% Safety and Infection Control 83% Pharmacological and Parenteral Therapies
1 action maps to this subcategory. 6 actions map to this subcategory.
D
B. Health Promotion and Maintenance D. Physiological Integrity
B 94% 18 actions map to this subcategory. 100% Reduction of Risk Potential
2 actions map to this subcategory.
C. Psychosocial Integrity D. Physiological Integrity
C 75% 8 actions map to this subcategory. 91% Physiologic Adaptation
11 actions map to this subcategory.
, Tenzing Khando
AutoGen_bc57541c-e2e3-4c73-8248-
Capella University
Section Summary
Level of Care Selection
Level of Care Score
High 5/5 (100%)
Medium / Low 5/5 (100%)
Level of Care Selection Total 10/10 (100%)
0 5 10
Patient Prioritization
Level of Care Score
High 5/5 (100%)
Medium / Low 5/5 (100%)
Patient Prioritization Total 10/10 (100%)
0 5 10
Intervention Selection
Level of Care Score
High 20/20 (100%)
Medium / Low 20/20 (100%)
Intervention Selection Total 40/40 (100%)
> Intervention Selection Per Patient
100% 4
75% 3
50% 2
25% 1
0% 0
Preston Shiver Joyce Cochran Manuel Akako Ryu Isabell Prestes Anna Lupe Ai Goh Lawrence Ellis Hasina Joseph Dugan
Dejesus Gutema
High Medium / Low
