Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 21 pages
Class notes

Lecture Notes Modern Korean History | Leiden | 2024/25

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 21 pages

Lecture notes from Dr. Christopher Green's Modern Korean History course at Leiden University covering Korea's transition from the Chosŏn Dynasty into the modern era. The notes examine key topics including the Treaty of Kanghwa (1876), the Daewongun period, 19th-century reforms, and the ideological frameworks shaping modern Korea (imperialism, nationalism, authoritarianism, democracy). These well-organized notes clarify common misconceptions about the Chosŏn period and trace Korea's path through isolationism toward modernization, making them essential for understanding the political and social foundations of contemporary North and South Korea.

Content preview

Modern Korean History
Dr. Christopher Green



4 Feb.

Korea’s modern history is shaped by both domestic developments and international influences.
The signing of the Treaty of Kanghwa in 1876 is identified as the moment Korea entered the
modern world of sovereign nation-states, forced into international engagement.

Imperialism → Japanese Empire, Napoleon

Capitalism → Free trade, industrialization

Colonialism → “eat or be eaten’ mindset

Nationalism → preserving customs and traditions, pride, centralization

Militarism → militarization in government and society

Marxism-Leninism → communism, socialism

Democracy → autonomy, independence, westernization, the D in DPRK

Authoritarianism → South Korea went from dictatorship to democracy while North Korea remained
under totalitarian rule

4 misinterpretations about Chosŏn:
Chosŏn was not a hermit kingdom, but they were isolated, China as well. Chosŏn was however
the slowest with exiting their isolationism which made them look like such.
-​ Chosŏn still traded with other countries and there were cultural exchanges.
Chosŏn was not a constant victim of foreign invasion.
-​ het viel best mee vergeleken met andere landen en perioden
Chosŏn did not have stagnation → there was no lack of activity, growth, or development, Chosŏn
was flourishing (think of the long reigns)
-​ ze waren minder snel met modernisatie dan Japan, aangezien Japan daartoe werd
gedwongen waardoor Korea achter leek te lopen, waardoor Japan een kans zag om Korea
te “helpen”
Chosŏn did not have despotism (the exercise of absolute power, especially in a cruel and
oppressive way)
-​ vanaf het neo-confucianisme hadden de leiders beperkte macht, toch werden ze door het
buitenland als tirannen neergezet

18th century
-​ Korean Golden Age
-​ peace, stability, prosperity (in China too)
-​ moral, rationalistic order in a settled Confucian system

, -​ trade growth (with China and Japan)

실학
-​ tribute missions offered a window to the world (700 missions during the Qing dynasty, and
12 missions to Edo during 1607-1811)
-​ new ideas
-​ education → Confucian academies (서원)

State-society relations
-​ taxes to support (army, scholars, governments)
-​ the peasantry paid tax on everything

Roots of Korean capitalism
-​ collection of tribute rax
-​ 계 → cooperative utilization of capital
-​ trade was however not encouraged

19th century
-​ “the beginning of the end”
-​ reform → unsettlement of the status quo
-​ monopoly of power by 양반 → which they eventually lost
-​ 서자 (children of concubines) and 준인 (specialists) admitted to state exams
-​ access to knowledge
-​ corruption expanded
-​ the peasantry was dissatisfied → destitution led to uprisings
-​ slavery did decline

대원군 (이하응 (1821-1898); the father of 고종)
-​ de facto regent from 1864 to 1873
-​ he fought for dynastic restoration, decrease of 서원 schools, reduction of the power of the
양반 class, isolationism (including persecution of Catholics/Christians), anti-corruption
-​ he wanted a land survey but high costs wouldn't allow it to happen (he wanted to organise
taxes totally)
-​ he was sino-centric
-​ he was in support of the chungin and secondary sons (준인 & 서자)
-​ he was very different than his son Kojong, who was progressive, into reforms and
diplomatic relations

1866 → General Sherman at P'yŏngyang river, wanting to open trade with P'yŏngyang
1866 → French Catholics killed by Chosŏn, France wanted revenge
1868 → Meiji Restoration
1871 → American expedition to find the General Sherman
1875 → Unyō accident
1876 → Treaty of 강화 (unequal)
1877 → Kuroda mission (which led to the Treaty)

The involvement of China did not end after the Treaty.

Connected book
 image
Publisher: december 2007 ISBN: 9780415414838 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Study
Uploaded on
September 8, 2026
Number of pages
21
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Class notes
Professor(s)
Christopher green
Contains
All classes
$8.34

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
0
Followers
0
Items
5
Last sold
-



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions