Austro Control GmbH ? Transport Pilot
Licence Theoretical Exam Human
Performance
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Loading data, moments, center of gravity and envelope checks including
recognition of abnormal or noncompliant? Case EB-2773-0001: 10 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 3 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 17 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Loading data, moments, center of gravity and envelope checks including recognition of; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Loading data, moments, center of gravity and envelope checks including recognition of against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 17-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Takeoff and landing distance with surface, slope, wind and obstacle
effects to support reliable, ethical flight? Case EB-2773-0002: 8 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 16 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 15 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Takeoff and landing distance with surface, slope, wind and obstacle effects to support; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Takeoff and landing distance with surface, slope, wind and obstacle effects to support against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 15-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Climb, cruise, descent, endurance and range performance integrated
across the tasks expected in flight performance? Case EB-2773-0003: 6 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 5 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 13 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Climb, cruise, descent, endurance and range performance integrated across the tasks; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Climb, cruise, descent, endurance and range performance integrated across the tasks against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 13-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Fuel policy, reserves, alternate planning and in-flight replanning within
the flight performance and planning? Case EB-2773-0004: 4 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 18 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Fuel policy, reserves, alternate planning and in-flight replanning within the flight; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
D. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Fuel policy, reserves, alternate planning and in-flight replanning within the flight against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Aircraft limitations, performance charts and interpolation methods as
applied to flight performance and planning? Case EB-2773-0005: 2 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 7 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 9 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Aircraft limitations, performance charts and interpolation methods as applied to flight; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Aircraft limitations, performance charts and interpolation methods as applied to flight against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 9-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Austro Control GmbH ? Transport Pilot Licence Theoretical Exam Human Performance
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Route selection using weather, airspace, terrain and operational
constraints with decisions and evidence relevant? Case EB-2773-0006: 9 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 20 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 7 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Route selection using weather, airspace, terrain and operational constraints with decisions; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Route selection using weather, airspace, terrain and operational constraints with against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 7-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Operational flight plans, mass documents and preflight briefings for safe,
accurate work in flight performance and? Case EB-2773-0007: 7 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 9 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 5 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Operational flight plans, mass documents and preflight briefings for safe, accurate work in; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Operational flight plans, mass documents and preflight briefings for safe, accurate against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 5-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Fatigue, sleep, workload, stress and performance degradation through
realistic flight performance and planning? Case EB-2773-0008: 5 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 22 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 3 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Fatigue, sleep, workload, stress and performance degradation through realistic flight; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Fatigue, sleep, workload, stress and performance degradation through realistic flight against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 3-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Attention, memory, decision biases and situational awareness with
emphasis on boundaries and responsibilities in? Case EB-2773-0009: 3 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 11 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 1 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Attention, memory, decision biases and situational awareness with emphasis on boundaries;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Attention, memory, decision biases and situational awareness with emphasis on against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 1-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Cockpit instruments, indications, limitations and recognition of system
faults for defensible calculations and? Case EB-2773-0010: 10 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 24 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 18 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Cockpit instruments, indications, limitations and recognition of system faults for; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Cockpit instruments, indications, limitations and recognition of system faults for against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 18-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Austro Control GmbH ? Transport Pilot Licence Theoretical Exam Human Performance
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Loading data, moments, center of gravity and envelope checks including recognition of abnormal or
noncompliant during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2773-0011: 8 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 13 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 16 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Loading data, moments, center of gravity and envelope checks including recognition of, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Loading data, moments, center of gravity and envelope checks including recognition of against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 16-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Takeoff and landing distance with surface, slope, wind and obstacle effects to support reliable, ethical flight
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2773-0012: 6 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 2 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 14 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Takeoff and landing distance with surface, slope, wind and obstacle effects to support, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Takeoff and landing distance with surface, slope, wind and obstacle effects to support against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 14-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Climb, cruise, descent, endurance and range performance integrated across the tasks expected in flight
performance during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2773-0013: 4 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 15 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 12 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Climb, cruise, descent, endurance and range performance integrated across the tasks, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Climb, cruise, descent, endurance and range performance integrated across the tasks against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 12-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Fuel policy, reserves, alternate planning and in-flight replanning within the flight performance and planning
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2773-0014: 2 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 4 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 10 unit(s).
A. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Fuel policy, reserves, alternate planning and in-flight replanning within the flight, repeat the calculation with an
independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
B. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Fuel policy, reserves, alternate planning and in-flight replanning within the flight against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 10-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Aircraft limitations, performance charts and interpolation methods as applied to flight performance and planning
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2773-0015: 9 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 17 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Aircraft limitations, performance charts and interpolation methods as applied to flight, repeat the calculation with
an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
D. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Aircraft limitations, performance charts and interpolation methods as applied to flight against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Austro Control GmbH ? Transport Pilot Licence Theoretical Exam Human Performance
Page 4
Licence Theoretical Exam Human
Performance
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Loading data, moments, center of gravity and envelope checks including
recognition of abnormal or noncompliant? Case EB-2773-0001: 10 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 3 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 17 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Loading data, moments, center of gravity and envelope checks including recognition of; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Loading data, moments, center of gravity and envelope checks including recognition of against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 17-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Takeoff and landing distance with surface, slope, wind and obstacle
effects to support reliable, ethical flight? Case EB-2773-0002: 8 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 16 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 15 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Takeoff and landing distance with surface, slope, wind and obstacle effects to support; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Takeoff and landing distance with surface, slope, wind and obstacle effects to support against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 15-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Climb, cruise, descent, endurance and range performance integrated
across the tasks expected in flight performance? Case EB-2773-0003: 6 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 5 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 13 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Climb, cruise, descent, endurance and range performance integrated across the tasks; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Climb, cruise, descent, endurance and range performance integrated across the tasks against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 13-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Fuel policy, reserves, alternate planning and in-flight replanning within
the flight performance and planning? Case EB-2773-0004: 4 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 18 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Fuel policy, reserves, alternate planning and in-flight replanning within the flight; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
D. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Fuel policy, reserves, alternate planning and in-flight replanning within the flight against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Aircraft limitations, performance charts and interpolation methods as
applied to flight performance and planning? Case EB-2773-0005: 2 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 7 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 9 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Aircraft limitations, performance charts and interpolation methods as applied to flight; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Aircraft limitations, performance charts and interpolation methods as applied to flight against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 9-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Austro Control GmbH ? Transport Pilot Licence Theoretical Exam Human Performance
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Route selection using weather, airspace, terrain and operational
constraints with decisions and evidence relevant? Case EB-2773-0006: 9 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 20 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 7 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Route selection using weather, airspace, terrain and operational constraints with decisions; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Route selection using weather, airspace, terrain and operational constraints with against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 7-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Operational flight plans, mass documents and preflight briefings for safe,
accurate work in flight performance and? Case EB-2773-0007: 7 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 9 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 5 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Operational flight plans, mass documents and preflight briefings for safe, accurate work in; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Operational flight plans, mass documents and preflight briefings for safe, accurate against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 5-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Fatigue, sleep, workload, stress and performance degradation through
realistic flight performance and planning? Case EB-2773-0008: 5 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 22 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 3 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Fatigue, sleep, workload, stress and performance degradation through realistic flight; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Fatigue, sleep, workload, stress and performance degradation through realistic flight against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 3-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Attention, memory, decision biases and situational awareness with
emphasis on boundaries and responsibilities in? Case EB-2773-0009: 3 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 11 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 1 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Attention, memory, decision biases and situational awareness with emphasis on boundaries;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Attention, memory, decision biases and situational awareness with emphasis on against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 1-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Cockpit instruments, indications, limitations and recognition of system
faults for defensible calculations and? Case EB-2773-0010: 10 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 24 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 18 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Cockpit instruments, indications, limitations and recognition of system faults for; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Cockpit instruments, indications, limitations and recognition of system faults for against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 18-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Austro Control GmbH ? Transport Pilot Licence Theoretical Exam Human Performance
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Loading data, moments, center of gravity and envelope checks including recognition of abnormal or
noncompliant during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2773-0011: 8 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 13 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 16 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Loading data, moments, center of gravity and envelope checks including recognition of, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Loading data, moments, center of gravity and envelope checks including recognition of against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 16-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Takeoff and landing distance with surface, slope, wind and obstacle effects to support reliable, ethical flight
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2773-0012: 6 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 2 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 14 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Takeoff and landing distance with surface, slope, wind and obstacle effects to support, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Takeoff and landing distance with surface, slope, wind and obstacle effects to support against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 14-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Climb, cruise, descent, endurance and range performance integrated across the tasks expected in flight
performance during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2773-0013: 4 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 15 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 12 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
D. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Climb, cruise, descent, endurance and range performance integrated across the tasks, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Climb, cruise, descent, endurance and range performance integrated across the tasks against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 12-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Fuel policy, reserves, alternate planning and in-flight replanning within the flight performance and planning
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2773-0014: 2 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 4 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 10 unit(s).
A. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Fuel policy, reserves, alternate planning and in-flight replanning within the flight, repeat the calculation with an
independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
B. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Fuel policy, reserves, alternate planning and in-flight replanning within the flight against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 10-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Aircraft limitations, performance charts and interpolation methods as applied to flight performance and planning
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2773-0015: 9 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 17 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
B. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Aircraft limitations, performance charts and interpolation methods as applied to flight, repeat the calculation with
an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
C. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
D. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Aircraft limitations, performance charts and interpolation methods as applied to flight against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
Austro Control GmbH ? Transport Pilot Licence Theoretical Exam Human Performance
Page 4
