CSWIP Penetrant Testing Certification
Examination ? Exam Review and Answer Key
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Capillary action, wetting, viscosity and penetrant sensitivity as applied to
liquid-penetrant testing? Case EB-2729-0001: 2 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last review was 7 hour(s)
ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
B. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
C. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Capillary action, wetting, viscosity and penetrant sensitivity as
applied to; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Capillary action, wetting, viscosity and penetrant sensitivity as applied to against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Visible and fluorescent penetrant families and removal methods with
decisions and evidence relevant to? Case EB-2729-0002: 9 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 20 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 9 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Visible and fluorescent penetrant families and removal
methods with decisions and evidence; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Visible and fluorescent penetrant families and removal methods with decisions and against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 9-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Precleaning, drying, dwell, removal, developer and inspection sequence
for safe, accurate work in liquid-penetrant? Case EB-2729-0003: 7 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 9 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 7 unit(s).
A. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Precleaning, drying, dwell, removal, developer and inspection
sequence for safe, accurate; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Precleaning, drying, dwell, removal, developer and inspection sequence for safe against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 7-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Lighting, temperature and timing controls through realistic
liquid-penetrant testing? Case EB-2729-0004: 5 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last review was 22
hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 5 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Lighting, temperature and timing controls through realistic liquid-penetrant testing; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Lighting, temperature and timing controls through realistic liquid-penetrant testing against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 5-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Indication interpretation by size, shape, location and bleed-out behavior
with emphasis on boundaries and? Case EB-2729-0005: 3 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 11 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 3 unit(s).
A. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
B. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
C. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Indication interpretation by size, shape, location and bleed-out
behavior with emphasis on; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Indication interpretation by size, shape, location and bleed-out behavior with emphasis against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 3-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
CSWIP Penetrant Testing Certification Examination ? Exam Review and Answer Key
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Background, over-washing, contamination and false indications for
defensible calculations and documentation in? Case EB-2729-0006: 10 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 24 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 1 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Background, over-washing, contamination and false indications for defensible calculations; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Background, over-washing, contamination and false indications for defensible against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 1-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving System-performance checks, comparator panels and material controls
including recognition of abnormal or? Case EB-2729-0007: 8 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 13 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 18 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for System-performance checks, comparator panels and material controls including recognition of;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies System-performance checks, comparator panels and material controls including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 18-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without
exceeding authorization to support reliable? Case EB-2729-0008: 6 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 2 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 16 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
C. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without
exceeding authorization to; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without exceeding authorization against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 16-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable
records integrated across the tasks? Case EB-2729-0009: 4 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 15 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 14 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable records integrated;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable records against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 14-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Post-cleaning, records and method limitations for porous or rough
surfaces within the liquid-penetrant testing? Case EB-2729-0010: 2 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 4 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 12 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Post-cleaning, records and method limitations for porous or
rough surfaces within the; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
C. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
D. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Post-cleaning, records and method limitations for porous or rough surfaces within the against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 12-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
CSWIP Penetrant Testing Certification Examination ? Exam Review and Answer Key
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Capillary action, wetting, viscosity and penetrant sensitivity as applied to liquid-penetrant testing during a
pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2729-0011: 9 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 17 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 10 unit(s).
A. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Capillary action, wetting, viscosity and penetrant sensitivity as applied to, investigate the unexpected
indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
D. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Capillary action, wetting, viscosity and penetrant sensitivity as applied to against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 10-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Visible and fluorescent penetrant families and removal methods with decisions and evidence relevant to during a
pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2729-0012: 7 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 6 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Visible and fluorescent penetrant families and removal methods with decisions and evidence, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
D. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Visible and fluorescent penetrant families and removal methods with decisions and against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Precleaning, drying, dwell, removal, developer and inspection sequence for safe, accurate work in
liquid-penetrant during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2729-0013: 5 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 19 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 6 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Precleaning, drying, dwell, removal, developer and inspection sequence for safe, accurate, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Precleaning, drying, dwell, removal, developer and inspection sequence for safe against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 6-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Lighting, temperature and timing controls through realistic liquid-penetrant testing during a pre-task planning
review. What should happen first? Case EB-2729-0014: 3 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the last review was
8 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 4 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Lighting, temperature and timing controls through realistic liquid-penetrant testing, repeat the calculation with an
independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Lighting, temperature and timing controls through realistic liquid-penetrant testing against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 4-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Indication interpretation by size, shape, location and bleed-out behavior with emphasis on boundaries and
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2729-0015: 10 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 21 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 2 unit(s).
A. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
B. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
C. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
D. Check calibration and method controls affecting Indication interpretation by size, shape, location and bleed-out behavior with emphasis on, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Indication interpretation by size, shape, location and bleed-out behavior with emphasis against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 2-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
CSWIP Penetrant Testing Certification Examination ? Exam Review and Answer Key
Page 4
Examination ? Exam Review and Answer Key
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Capillary action, wetting, viscosity and penetrant sensitivity as applied to
liquid-penetrant testing? Case EB-2729-0001: 2 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last review was 7 hour(s)
ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
B. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
C. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Capillary action, wetting, viscosity and penetrant sensitivity as
applied to; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Capillary action, wetting, viscosity and penetrant sensitivity as applied to against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Visible and fluorescent penetrant families and removal methods with
decisions and evidence relevant to? Case EB-2729-0002: 9 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 20 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 9 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Visible and fluorescent penetrant families and removal
methods with decisions and evidence; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Visible and fluorescent penetrant families and removal methods with decisions and against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 9-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Precleaning, drying, dwell, removal, developer and inspection sequence
for safe, accurate work in liquid-penetrant? Case EB-2729-0003: 7 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 9 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 7 unit(s).
A. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Precleaning, drying, dwell, removal, developer and inspection
sequence for safe, accurate; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Precleaning, drying, dwell, removal, developer and inspection sequence for safe against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 7-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Lighting, temperature and timing controls through realistic
liquid-penetrant testing? Case EB-2729-0004: 5 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last review was 22
hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 5 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Lighting, temperature and timing controls through realistic liquid-penetrant testing; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Lighting, temperature and timing controls through realistic liquid-penetrant testing against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 5-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Indication interpretation by size, shape, location and bleed-out behavior
with emphasis on boundaries and? Case EB-2729-0005: 3 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 11 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 3 unit(s).
A. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
B. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
C. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Indication interpretation by size, shape, location and bleed-out
behavior with emphasis on; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Indication interpretation by size, shape, location and bleed-out behavior with emphasis against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 3-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
CSWIP Penetrant Testing Certification Examination ? Exam Review and Answer Key
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Background, over-washing, contamination and false indications for
defensible calculations and documentation in? Case EB-2729-0006: 10 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 24 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 1 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Background, over-washing, contamination and false indications for defensible calculations; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Background, over-washing, contamination and false indications for defensible against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 1-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving System-performance checks, comparator panels and material controls
including recognition of abnormal or? Case EB-2729-0007: 8 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 13 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 18 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for System-performance checks, comparator panels and material controls including recognition of;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
C. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies System-performance checks, comparator panels and material controls including against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 18-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without
exceeding authorization to support reliable? Case EB-2729-0008: 6 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 2 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 16 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
C. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without
exceeding authorization to; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Code, specification and acceptance-criteria application without exceeding authorization against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 16-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable
records integrated across the tasks? Case EB-2729-0009: 4 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 15 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 14 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable records integrated;
recalculate independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Equipment calibration, reference standards, control checks and traceable records against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 14-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Post-cleaning, records and method limitations for porous or rough
surfaces within the liquid-penetrant testing? Case EB-2729-0010: 2 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 4 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 12 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Post-cleaning, records and method limitations for porous or
rough surfaces within the; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
C. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
D. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Post-cleaning, records and method limitations for porous or rough surfaces within the against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 12-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
CSWIP Penetrant Testing Certification Examination ? Exam Review and Answer Key
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Capillary action, wetting, viscosity and penetrant sensitivity as applied to liquid-penetrant testing during a
pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2729-0011: 9 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 17 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 10 unit(s).
A. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Capillary action, wetting, viscosity and penetrant sensitivity as applied to, investigate the unexpected
indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
D. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Capillary action, wetting, viscosity and penetrant sensitivity as applied to against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 10-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Visible and fluorescent penetrant families and removal methods with decisions and evidence relevant to during a
pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2729-0012: 7 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 6 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Visible and fluorescent penetrant families and removal methods with decisions and evidence, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
D. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Visible and fluorescent penetrant families and removal methods with decisions and against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Precleaning, drying, dwell, removal, developer and inspection sequence for safe, accurate work in
liquid-penetrant during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2729-0013: 5 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 19 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 6 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Precleaning, drying, dwell, removal, developer and inspection sequence for safe, accurate, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Precleaning, drying, dwell, removal, developer and inspection sequence for safe against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 6-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Lighting, temperature and timing controls through realistic liquid-penetrant testing during a pre-task planning
review. What should happen first? Case EB-2729-0014: 3 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the last review was
8 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 4 unit(s).
A. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
B. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
C. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Lighting, temperature and timing controls through realistic liquid-penetrant testing, repeat the calculation with an
independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
D. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Lighting, temperature and timing controls through realistic liquid-penetrant testing against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 4-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Indication interpretation by size, shape, location and bleed-out behavior with emphasis on boundaries and
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2729-0015: 10 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 21 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 2 unit(s).
A. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
B. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
C. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
D. Check calibration and method controls affecting Indication interpretation by size, shape, location and bleed-out behavior with emphasis on, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Indication interpretation by size, shape, location and bleed-out behavior with emphasis against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 2-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
CSWIP Penetrant Testing Certification Examination ? Exam Review and Answer Key
Page 4
