JD Next Comprehensive Exam 2 Questions
and Answers Latest Versions Top Rated A+
Question 1 — Conditional Reasoning
A law school states:
“If an applicant submits all required documents by the deadline, the application will be
considered complete. If an application is complete, it will be reviewed by the admissions
committee.”
Maria submitted all required documents by the deadline.
Which conclusion must be true?
A. Maria will be admitted.
B. Maria's application will be considered complete.
C. Maria will receive a scholarship.
D. Maria's application will be reviewed before every incomplete application.
Answer: B
Rationale: The first rule establishes that submitting all required documents by the deadline is
sufficient for the application to be considered complete. Maria satisfies that condition. Therefore,
her application must be considered complete. Nothing establishes admission, scholarship
eligibility, or comparative review timing.
Question 2 — Contrapositive
A university policy provides:
“If a student is eligible for the research grant, then the student has completed the required
research seminar.”
Which statement is logically equivalent?
A. Anyone who completes the seminar is eligible for the grant.
B. Anyone who does not complete the seminar is not eligible for the grant.
C. Anyone who is not eligible for the grant did not complete the seminar.
D. Anyone who completes the seminar is guaranteed funding.
Answer: B
,Rationale: The original conditional is Grant eligibility → Seminar completed. Its contrapositive
is Seminar not completed → Not grant eligible. The other choices improperly reverse or expand
the original condition.
Question 3 — Strengthen the Argument
A city council argues:
“The city should install additional streetlights because neighborhoods with more streetlights
report fewer nighttime accidents.”
Which fact would most strengthen the argument?
A. Residents generally prefer brighter neighborhoods.
B. Installing streetlights is relatively inexpensive.
C. Accident rates declined specifically after additional streetlights were installed in several
comparable neighborhoods.
D. Some residents use flashlights while walking at night.
Answer: C
Rationale: The argument assumes that additional streetlights reduce accidents. Evidence
showing that accident rates declined after installation in comparable neighborhoods directly
supports that causal connection. A and B are relevant but less probative; D does not establish
effectiveness.
Question 4 — Weaken the Argument
A company concludes:
“Employees who work from home are more productive than employees who work in the office
because our remote employees completed more projects last quarter.”
Which fact most weakens the conclusion?
A. Remote employees have access to company laptops.
B. Remote employees generally work similar hours.
C. Employees were allowed to work remotely only after completing their most difficult projects.
D. Some office employees prefer working remotely.
Answer: C
,Rationale: If remote employees had already completed their most difficult projects before
becoming remote, their higher productivity may be explained by the easier workload rather than
remote work. This introduces a strong alternative explanation.
Question 5 — Assumption
A restaurant owner says:
“We should extend our hours until midnight because restaurants that remain open later earn more
revenue.”
The argument assumes that:
A. customers prefer restaurants that close early.
B. remaining open later will generate enough additional sales to justify the additional operating
costs.
C. all restaurants should remain open until midnight.
D. employees prefer working late.
Answer: B
Rationale: Higher revenue does not necessarily mean higher profit. The restaurant incurs
additional labor, utilities, and other costs by staying open later. The argument therefore depends
on the assumption that the additional revenue will make the extension worthwhile.
Question 6 — Rule Application
A university rule states:
“Any student who knowingly submits fabricated information on an academic application is
subject to disciplinary action.”
Jordan accidentally enters the wrong graduation month but does not realize the error.
Under the stated rule, which is most accurate?
A. Jordan is automatically subject to discipline.
B. Jordan is subject to discipline because any incorrect information violates the rule.
C. Jordan is not covered by the rule because the mistake was not knowingly made.
D. Jordan is subject to discipline only if another student complains.
Answer: C
, Rationale: The rule requires that the student knowingly submit fabricated information. Jordan's
error was accidental, so the required mental state is absent.
Question 7 — Necessary Inference
All applicants who receive a particular fellowship have demonstrated financial need.
Some applicants who demonstrate financial need have exceptional academic records.
Which statement must be true?
A. Every applicant with financial need receives the fellowship.
B. Every fellowship recipient has demonstrated financial need.
C. Every applicant with an exceptional academic record receives the fellowship.
D. No fellowship recipient has an exceptional academic record.
Answer: B
Rationale: The first statement directly establishes Fellowship → Financial need. The existence
of some financially needy applicants with exceptional academic records does not establish that
those applicants receive fellowships.
Question 8 — Logical Flaw
A mayor argues:
“Crime increased during the same year that the city opened three new parks. Therefore, the parks
caused the increase in crime.”
The argument is most vulnerable because it:
A. assumes that parks cannot benefit residents.
B. confuses temporal correlation with causation.
C. assumes crime can never increase.
D. relies on an irrelevant comparison.
Answer: B
Rationale: The fact that two events occurred during the same period does not establish that one
caused the other. Other factors could explain the increase in crime.
and Answers Latest Versions Top Rated A+
Question 1 — Conditional Reasoning
A law school states:
“If an applicant submits all required documents by the deadline, the application will be
considered complete. If an application is complete, it will be reviewed by the admissions
committee.”
Maria submitted all required documents by the deadline.
Which conclusion must be true?
A. Maria will be admitted.
B. Maria's application will be considered complete.
C. Maria will receive a scholarship.
D. Maria's application will be reviewed before every incomplete application.
Answer: B
Rationale: The first rule establishes that submitting all required documents by the deadline is
sufficient for the application to be considered complete. Maria satisfies that condition. Therefore,
her application must be considered complete. Nothing establishes admission, scholarship
eligibility, or comparative review timing.
Question 2 — Contrapositive
A university policy provides:
“If a student is eligible for the research grant, then the student has completed the required
research seminar.”
Which statement is logically equivalent?
A. Anyone who completes the seminar is eligible for the grant.
B. Anyone who does not complete the seminar is not eligible for the grant.
C. Anyone who is not eligible for the grant did not complete the seminar.
D. Anyone who completes the seminar is guaranteed funding.
Answer: B
,Rationale: The original conditional is Grant eligibility → Seminar completed. Its contrapositive
is Seminar not completed → Not grant eligible. The other choices improperly reverse or expand
the original condition.
Question 3 — Strengthen the Argument
A city council argues:
“The city should install additional streetlights because neighborhoods with more streetlights
report fewer nighttime accidents.”
Which fact would most strengthen the argument?
A. Residents generally prefer brighter neighborhoods.
B. Installing streetlights is relatively inexpensive.
C. Accident rates declined specifically after additional streetlights were installed in several
comparable neighborhoods.
D. Some residents use flashlights while walking at night.
Answer: C
Rationale: The argument assumes that additional streetlights reduce accidents. Evidence
showing that accident rates declined after installation in comparable neighborhoods directly
supports that causal connection. A and B are relevant but less probative; D does not establish
effectiveness.
Question 4 — Weaken the Argument
A company concludes:
“Employees who work from home are more productive than employees who work in the office
because our remote employees completed more projects last quarter.”
Which fact most weakens the conclusion?
A. Remote employees have access to company laptops.
B. Remote employees generally work similar hours.
C. Employees were allowed to work remotely only after completing their most difficult projects.
D. Some office employees prefer working remotely.
Answer: C
,Rationale: If remote employees had already completed their most difficult projects before
becoming remote, their higher productivity may be explained by the easier workload rather than
remote work. This introduces a strong alternative explanation.
Question 5 — Assumption
A restaurant owner says:
“We should extend our hours until midnight because restaurants that remain open later earn more
revenue.”
The argument assumes that:
A. customers prefer restaurants that close early.
B. remaining open later will generate enough additional sales to justify the additional operating
costs.
C. all restaurants should remain open until midnight.
D. employees prefer working late.
Answer: B
Rationale: Higher revenue does not necessarily mean higher profit. The restaurant incurs
additional labor, utilities, and other costs by staying open later. The argument therefore depends
on the assumption that the additional revenue will make the extension worthwhile.
Question 6 — Rule Application
A university rule states:
“Any student who knowingly submits fabricated information on an academic application is
subject to disciplinary action.”
Jordan accidentally enters the wrong graduation month but does not realize the error.
Under the stated rule, which is most accurate?
A. Jordan is automatically subject to discipline.
B. Jordan is subject to discipline because any incorrect information violates the rule.
C. Jordan is not covered by the rule because the mistake was not knowingly made.
D. Jordan is subject to discipline only if another student complains.
Answer: C
, Rationale: The rule requires that the student knowingly submit fabricated information. Jordan's
error was accidental, so the required mental state is absent.
Question 7 — Necessary Inference
All applicants who receive a particular fellowship have demonstrated financial need.
Some applicants who demonstrate financial need have exceptional academic records.
Which statement must be true?
A. Every applicant with financial need receives the fellowship.
B. Every fellowship recipient has demonstrated financial need.
C. Every applicant with an exceptional academic record receives the fellowship.
D. No fellowship recipient has an exceptional academic record.
Answer: B
Rationale: The first statement directly establishes Fellowship → Financial need. The existence
of some financially needy applicants with exceptional academic records does not establish that
those applicants receive fellowships.
Question 8 — Logical Flaw
A mayor argues:
“Crime increased during the same year that the city opened three new parks. Therefore, the parks
caused the increase in crime.”
The argument is most vulnerable because it:
A. assumes that parks cannot benefit residents.
B. confuses temporal correlation with causation.
C. assumes crime can never increase.
D. relies on an irrelevant comparison.
Answer: B
Rationale: The fact that two events occurred during the same period does not establish that one
caused the other. Other factors could explain the increase in crime.
