British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN
Weld Inspection Level 2 Examination
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Reporting location, size, orientation, confidence, limitations and
examination coverage integrated across the tasks? Case EB-2719-0001: 10 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 21 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 1 unit(s).
A. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
B. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
C. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Reporting location, size, orientation, confidence, limitations
and examination coverage; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
D. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Reporting location, size, orientation, confidence, limitations and examination coverage against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 1-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and
escalation of ambiguous findings within the? Case EB-2719-0002: 8 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 10 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 18 unit(s).
A. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
B. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
C. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and
escalation of ambiguous; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 18-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related
damage mechanisms as applied to? Case EB-2719-0003: 6 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 23 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 16 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Discontinuity formation, material processing history and
service-related damage mechanisms; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
C. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
D. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 16-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and
performance checks with decisions and evidence? Case EB-2719-0004: 4 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 12 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 14 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
D. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with against current requirements
and evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 14-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should
resolve the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected
flaw orientation for safe, accurate work in? Case EB-2719-0005: 2 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 1 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 12 unit(s).
A. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and
expected flaw orientation for; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
D. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 12-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Weld Inspection Level 2 Examination
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage
requirements through realistic nondestructive? Case EB-2719-0006: 9 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 14 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 10 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements through; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements through against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 10-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Signal, indication or image interpretation and separation of relevant from
false responses with emphasis on? Case EB-2719-0007: 7 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 3 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Signal, indication or image interpretation and separation of relevant from false responses; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Signal, indication or image interpretation and separation of relevant from false against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Welding processes, power sources, polarity, shielding and parameter
selection for defensible calculations and? Case EB-2719-0008: 5 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 16 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 6 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Welding processes, power sources, polarity, shielding and parameter selection for; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Welding processes, power sources, polarity, shielding and parameter selection for against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 6-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Base-metal and filler-metal identification, compatibility and consumable
control including recognition of abnormal? Case EB-2719-0009: 3 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 5 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 4 unit(s).
A. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
B. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Base-metal and filler-metal identification, compatibility and
consumable control including; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
C. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
D. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Base-metal and filler-metal identification, compatibility and consumable control against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 4-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Classification of deficiencies, immediate-risk escalation and corrective
timelines to support reliable, ethical? Case EB-2719-0010: 10 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 18 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 2 unit(s).
A. Record the hazard after completion but do not interrupt the current operation.
B. Protect personnel and equipment, stabilize the immediate condition related to Classification of deficiencies, immediate-risk escalation and corrective
timelines to, follow the approved response procedure, and document/escalate remaining risk.
C. Continue the activity until the scheduled break, then review the safety concern.
D. Restart as soon as the immediate symptom disappears without verifying the required safeguards.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Classification of deficiencies, immediate-risk escalation and corrective timelines to against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 2-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Weld Inspection Level 2 Examination
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Reporting location, size, orientation, confidence, limitations and examination coverage integrated across the
tasks during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2719-0011: 8 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s)
are available, the last review was 7 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 19 unit(s).
A. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
B. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
C. Check calibration and method controls affecting Reporting location, size, orientation, confidence, limitations and examination coverage, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
D. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Reporting location, size, orientation, confidence, limitations and examination coverage against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 19-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of ambiguous findings within the
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2719-0012: 6 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 20 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 17 unit(s).
A. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of ambiguous, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
D. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 17-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage mechanisms as applied to
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2719-0013: 4 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 9 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 15 unit(s).
A. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
B. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
C. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
D. Check calibration and method controls affecting Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage mechanisms, investigate
the unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 15-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with decisions and
evidence during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2719-0014: 2 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 22 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 13 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
C. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with against current requirements
and evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 13-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should
resolve the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation for safe, accurate work
in during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2719-0015: 9 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 11 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation for, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Weld Inspection Level 2 Examination
Page 4
Weld Inspection Level 2 Examination
,1. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Reporting location, size, orientation, confidence, limitations and
examination coverage integrated across the tasks? Case EB-2719-0001: 10 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 21 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 1 unit(s).
A. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
B. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
C. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Reporting location, size, orientation, confidence, limitations
and examination coverage; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
D. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Reporting location, size, orientation, confidence, limitations and examination coverage against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 1-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
2. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and
escalation of ambiguous findings within the? Case EB-2719-0002: 8 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 10 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 18 unit(s).
A. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
B. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
C. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
D. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and
escalation of ambiguous; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 18-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
3. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related
damage mechanisms as applied to? Case EB-2719-0003: 6 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 23 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 16 unit(s).
A. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Discontinuity formation, material processing history and
service-related damage mechanisms; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
B. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
C. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
D. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 16-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
4. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and
performance checks with decisions and evidence? Case EB-2719-0004: 4 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s) are available,
the last review was 12 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 14 unit(s).
A. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
D. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
Correct Answer: A
Explanation: The best answer verifies Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with against current requirements
and evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 14-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should
resolve the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
5. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected
flaw orientation for safe, accurate work in? Case EB-2719-0005: 2 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 1 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 12 unit(s).
A. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
B. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
C. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and
expected flaw orientation for; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
D. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 12-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Weld Inspection Level 2 Examination
Page 2
,6. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage
requirements through realistic nondestructive? Case EB-2719-0006: 9 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are available, the
last review was 14 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 10 unit(s).
A. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
B. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements through; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Surface preparation, scanning pattern, sensitivity and coverage requirements through against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 10-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
7. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Signal, indication or image interpretation and separation of relevant from
false responses with emphasis on? Case EB-2719-0007: 7 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 3 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 8 unit(s).
A. Use the previous calculation unchanged even though one or more current inputs have changed.
B. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
C. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
D. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Signal, indication or image interpretation and separation of relevant from false responses; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Signal, indication or image interpretation and separation of relevant from false against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 8-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
8. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Welding processes, power sources, polarity, shielding and parameter
selection for defensible calculations and? Case EB-2719-0008: 5 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 16 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 6 unit(s).
A. Average the conflicting results and accept the midpoint without checking the source data.
B. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
C. Recheck the inputs, units, assumptions, and limits for Welding processes, power sources, polarity, shielding and parameter selection for; recalculate
independently and document the verified result before proceeding.
D. Ignore unit or assumption differences if the final number appears reasonable.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Welding processes, power sources, polarity, shielding and parameter selection for against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 6-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
9. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Base-metal and filler-metal identification, compatibility and consumable
control including recognition of abnormal? Case EB-2719-0009: 3 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 5 supporting record(s) are available, the last
review was 5 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 4 unit(s).
A. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
B. Verify the procedure, equipment status, environmental conditions, and acceptance criteria for Base-metal and filler-metal identification, compatibility and
consumable control including; repeat or confirm the test only after controls are valid.
C. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
D. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Base-metal and filler-metal identification, compatibility and consumable control against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 5 supporting record(s), and a 4-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
10. During a pre-task planning review, which action best addresses a concern involving Classification of deficiencies, immediate-risk escalation and corrective
timelines to support reliable, ethical? Case EB-2719-0010: 10 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 2 supporting record(s) are available, the last review
was 18 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 2 unit(s).
A. Record the hazard after completion but do not interrupt the current operation.
B. Protect personnel and equipment, stabilize the immediate condition related to Classification of deficiencies, immediate-risk escalation and corrective
timelines to, follow the approved response procedure, and document/escalate remaining risk.
C. Continue the activity until the scheduled break, then review the safety concern.
D. Restart as soon as the immediate symptom disappears without verifying the required safeguards.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Classification of deficiencies, immediate-risk escalation and corrective timelines to against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 2 supporting record(s), and a 2-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Weld Inspection Level 2 Examination
Page 3
, 11. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Reporting location, size, orientation, confidence, limitations and examination coverage integrated across the
tasks during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2719-0011: 8 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 6 supporting record(s)
are available, the last review was 7 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 19 unit(s).
A. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
B. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
C. Check calibration and method controls affecting Reporting location, size, orientation, confidence, limitations and examination coverage, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
D. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Reporting location, size, orientation, confidence, limitations and examination coverage against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 6 supporting record(s), and a 19-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
12. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of ambiguous findings within the
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2719-0012: 6 checks are complete, 3 item(s) remain open, 3 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 20 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 17 unit(s).
A. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of ambiguous, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
D. Change the test sensitivity or acceptance limit without authorization to reduce false indications.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Personnel responsibilities, written instructions, supervision and escalation of against current requirements and evidence
before acceptance. With 3 open item(s), 3 supporting record(s), and a 17-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve the
discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
13. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage mechanisms as applied to
during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2719-0013: 4 checks are complete, 4 item(s) remain open, 7 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 9 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 15 unit(s).
A. Repeat the test until a passing result is obtained and discard the earlier inconsistent results.
B. Report only the final indication and omit the conditions that may have affected the test.
C. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
D. Check calibration and method controls affecting Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage mechanisms, investigate
the unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
Correct Answer: D
Explanation: The best answer verifies Discontinuity formation, material processing history and service-related damage against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 4 open item(s), 7 supporting record(s), and a 15-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
14. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with decisions and
evidence during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2719-0014: 2 checks are complete, 1 item(s) remain open, 4 supporting
record(s) are available, the last review was 22 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 13 unit(s).
A. Adjust an input until the result falls within the target range, then record only the final value.
B. Proceed using an estimate even though the approved method and current inputs are available.
C. Confirm source data and allowable limits for Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with, repeat the calculation
with an independent check, and resolve any difference before acceptance.
D. Select the most favorable result from repeated calculations without investigating the variation.
Correct Answer: C
Explanation: The best answer verifies Method physics, equipment components, calibration blocks and performance checks with against current requirements
and evidence before acceptance. With 1 open item(s), 4 supporting record(s), and a 13-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should
resolve the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
15. A reviewer finds conflicting evidence about Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation for safe, accurate work
in during a pre-task planning review. What should happen first? Case EB-2719-0015: 9 checks are complete, 2 item(s) remain open, 1 supporting record(s) are
available, the last review was 11 hour(s) ago, and the current result differs from the prior baseline by 11 unit(s).
A. Ignore equipment or environmental checks when the operator is experienced with the method.
B. Check calibration and method controls affecting Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation for, investigate the
unexpected indication or result, and document a defensible disposition.
C. Accept the result if it matches the expected outcome, even when a control check is invalid.
D. Use an expired or unverified reference because the difference is expected to be small.
Correct Answer: B
Explanation: The best answer verifies Procedure selection based on material, geometry, access and expected flaw orientation against current requirements and
evidence before acceptance. With 2 open item(s), 1 supporting record(s), and a 11-unit change from baseline, a traceable foundational decision should resolve
the discrepancy rather than defer, bypass, or redefine the control.
British Institute of Non-Destructive Testing PCN Weld Inspection Level 2 Examination
Page 4
