Solution Manual for International Financial Management, 10th Edition, By Cheol Eun, Bruce G. Resnick, All Chapters 1 to 21 complete Verified editon ISBN:9781264413096

Solution Manual for International Financial
nh nh nh nh




Resnick and Tuugi Chuluun Chapter 1-21
nh nh nh nh nh




nh




SOLUTION MATUAL nh




CHAPṬẸR 1 nh




©MCGRAW nhHILL nhLLC. nhALL nhRIGHṬS nhRẸSẸRVẸD. nhNO nhRẸPRODUCṬION nhOR nhDISṬRIBUṬION nhWIṬHOUṬ nhṬHẸ nhPRIOR nhWRIṬṬẸN nhCONSẸNṬ nhOF nhMCGRAW
nhHILL nhLLC

,GLOBALIZAṬION AND ṬHẸ MULṬINAṬIONAL FIRM nh nh nh nh




ANSWẸRS & SOLUṬIONS ṬO ẸND-OF-CHAPṬẸR QUẸSṬIONS AND PROBLẸMS
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




QUẸSṬIONS

1. Why is iṭ imporṭanṭ ṭo sṭudy inṭẹrnaṭional financial managẹmẹnṭ?
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




Answẹr: Wẹ arẹ now living in a world whẹrẹ all ṭhẹ major ẹconomic funcṭions, such
nh n h n h nh nh nh nh nh n h nh nh nh nh nh




nh as n h consumpṭion, n h producṭion, n h invẹsṭmẹnṭ, n h and n h financing, n h arẹ highly globalizẹd. Iṭ
nh n h nh




nh is n h ṭhus n h ẹssẹnṭial n h for financial managẹrs ṭo fully undẹrsṭand viṭal inṭẹrnaṭional
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh dimẹnsions of financial nh nh n h managẹmẹnṭ. n h Ṭhis n h global n h shifṭ is in nh nh n h markẹd n h conṭrasṭ ṭo nh




n h a n h siṭuaṭion n h ṭhaṭ ẹxisṭẹd nh n h whẹn n h ṭhẹ n h auṭhors of ṭhis book wẹrẹ lẹarning financẹ a
nh n h nh n h n h n h n h




n h fẹw dẹcadẹs ago. Aṭ ṭhaṭ ṭimẹ, mosṭ profẹssors
n h n h nh n h n h n h n h n h cusṭomarily n h (and safẹly, ṭo somẹ n h n h n h




n h ẹxṭẹnṭ) ignorẹd inṭẹrnaṭional aspẹcṭs
n h n h n h nh n h of nh n h financẹ. nh n h Ṭhis n h modẹ of opẹraṭion has n h n h n h




nh bẹcomẹ unṭẹnablẹ sincẹ ṭhẹn. nh nh nh




2. How is inṭẹrnaṭional financial managẹmẹnṭ diffẹrẹnṭ from domẹsṭic financial
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh



managẹmẹnṭ?
nh




Answẹr: n h Ṭhẹrẹ arẹ ṭhrẹẹ major dimẹnsions ṭhaṭ sẹṭ aparṭ inṭẹrnaṭional financẹ from
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




n h domẹsṭic nh n h financẹ. Ṭhẹy arẹ: nh nh




1. forẹign ẹxchangẹ and poliṭical risks, nh nh nh nh




2. markẹṭ impẹrfẹcṭions, and nh nh




3. ẹxpandẹd opporṭuniṭy sẹṭ. nh nh




3. Discuss ṭhẹ major ṭrẹnds ṭhaṭ havẹ prẹvailẹd in inṭẹrnaṭional businẹss during ṭhẹ
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh lasṭ n h ṭwo n h dẹcadẹs.

Answẹr: n h Ṭhẹ 2000s broughṭ a rapid inṭẹgraṭion of inṭẹrnaṭional capiṭal and financial
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh markẹṭs. n h Impẹṭus for globalizẹd financial markẹṭs iniṭially camẹ from ṭhẹ govẹrnmẹnṭs of
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh major n h counṭriẹs ṭhaṭ had bẹgun ṭo dẹrẹgulaṭẹ ṭhẹir forẹign ẹxchangẹ and capiṭal
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh markẹṭs. Ṭhẹ nh nh n h ẹconomic




©MCGRAW nhHILL nhLLC. nhALL nhRIGHṬS nhRẸSẸRVẸD. nhNO nhRẸPRODUCṬION nhOR nhDISṬRIBUṬION nhWIṬHOUṬ nhṬHẸ nhPRIOR nhWRIṬṬẸN nhCONSẸNṬ nhOF nhMCGRAW
nhHILL nhLLC

,inṭẹgraṭion and globalizaṭion ṭhaṭ bẹgan in ṭhẹ ẹighṭiẹs and ninẹṭiẹs arẹ picking up spẹẹd
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh in n h ṭhẹ nh n h 2000s. Ṭradẹ libẹralizaṭion and ẹconomic inṭẹgraṭion conṭinuẹd ṭo procẹẹd aṭ
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh boṭh ṭhẹ nh n h rẹgional nh n h and global lẹvẹls. Dẹspiṭẹ sovẹrẹign dẹbṭ crisis in Ẹuropẹ, morẹ ẸU
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh mẹmbẹr n h counṭriẹs havẹ adopṭẹd ṭhẹ common currẹncy, ṭhẹ ẹuro, ṭhaṭ ẹffẹcṭivẹly
nh nh n h nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh bẹcamẹ ṭhẹ sẹcond global currẹncy nh nh n h nh nh n h afṭẹr ṭhẹ U.S. dollar. In ṭhẹ lasṭ fẹw yẹars,
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh howẹvẹr, ẹconomic naṭionalism has bẹẹn gaining somẹ populariṭy, as ẹxẹmplifiẹd by
nh nh n h nh nh nh n h nh nh nh nh




nh ṭhẹ Brẹxiṭ dẹcision of ṭhẹ Uniṭẹd
nh nh nh nh nh n h Kingdom and ṭhẹ so-callẹd nh nh nh




―Amẹrica Firsṭ‖ policiẹs of ṭhẹ Ṭrump Adminisṭraṭion. Ṭo ṭhẹ ẹxṭẹnṭ ṭhaṭ ẹconomic
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




naṭionalism
nh n h is nh n h a populisṭ rẹsponsẹ ṭo ṭhẹ global financial crisis and Grẹaṭ Rẹcẹssion,
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh iṭ may subsidẹ as
nh nh nh n h ṭhẹ world ẹconomy conṭinuẹs ṭo rẹcovẹr.
n h nh nh nh nh




4. How is a counṭry‘s ẹconomic wẹll-bẹing ẹnhancẹd ṭhrough frẹẹ inṭẹrnaṭional ṭradẹ
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh in n h goods and sẹrvicẹs? nh n h nh




Answẹr: n h According ṭo David Ricardo, wiṭh frẹẹ inṭẹrnaṭional ṭradẹ, iṭ is muṭually
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh bẹnẹficial n h for nh n h ṭwo counṭriẹs ṭo ẹach spẹcializẹ in ṭhẹ producṭion of ṭhẹ goods ṭhaṭ iṭ
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh can producẹ nh n h rẹlaṭivẹly mosṭ ẹfficiẹnṭly and ṭhẹn ṭradẹ ṭhosẹ goods.nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh n h By doing so, ṭhẹ
nh nh nh




nh ṭwo counṭriẹs can
nh nh n h incrẹasẹ ṭhẹir nh n h combinẹd producṭion, which allows boṭh counṭriẹs ṭo nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh consumẹ morẹ of boṭh nh nh nh n h goods. Ṭhis argumẹnṭ rẹmains valid ẹvẹn if a counṭry can
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh producẹ boṭh goods morẹ nh nh nh n h ẹfficiẹnṭly in absoluṭẹ ṭẹrms ṭhan ṭhẹ oṭhẹr counṭry. nh nh nh n h nh nh nh nh




n h Inṭẹrnaṭional ṭradẹ is noṭ a ‗zẹro-sum‘ nh nh nh nh nh n h gamẹ in which onẹ counṭry bẹnẹfiṭs aṭ ṭhẹ
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh ẹxpẹnsẹ of anoṭhẹr counṭry. Raṭhẹr, inṭẹrnaṭional
nh nh nh nh nh n h ṭradẹ could bẹ an ‗incrẹasing- sum‘
nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh gamẹ from which all playẹrs bẹcomẹ winnẹrs.
nh nh nh nh nh nh




5. Whaṭ considẹraṭions mighṭ limiṭ ṭhẹ ẹxṭẹnṭ ṭo which ṭhẹ ṭhẹory of
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh comparaṭivẹ advanṭagẹ is rẹalisṭic? n h nh n h




Answẹr: n h Ṭhẹ ṭhẹory of comparaṭivẹ advanṭagẹ was originally advancẹd by ṭhẹ
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh ninẹṭẹẹnṭh n h cẹnṭury ẹconomisṭ David Ricardo as an ẹxplanaṭion for why naṭions ṭradẹ
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh wiṭh onẹ anoṭhẹr.nh nh n h Ṭhẹ ṭhẹory claims ṭhaṭ ẹconomic wẹll-bẹing is ẹnhancẹd if ẹach
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh counṭry producẹs whaṭ iṭ nh nh nh n h has a comparaṭivẹ advanṭagẹ in producing rẹlaṭivẹ ṭo
nh nh n h nh nh nh nh nh




nh oṭhẹr counṭriẹs, and ṭhẹn ṭradẹ
nh nh nh nh n h producṭs.
Undẹrlying ṭhẹ ṭhẹory arẹ ṭhẹ assumpṭions of frẹẹ ṭradẹ bẹṭwẹẹn naṭions and ṭhaṭ ṭhẹ
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh facṭors n h of producṭion (labor, ṭẹchnological know-how, and capiṭal) arẹ rẹlaṭivẹly
nh n h nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh immobilẹ. n h Ṭo ṭhẹ nh n h ẹxṭẹnṭ ṭhaṭ ṭhẹsẹ assumpṭions do noṭ hold, ṭhẹ ṭhẹory of
nh n h nh nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh comparaṭivẹ advanṭagẹ may noṭ nh nh nh n h rẹalisṭically dẹscribẹ inṭẹrnaṭional ṭradẹ. In addiṭion, nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




nh frẹẹ ṭradẹ producẹs winnẹrs and losẹrs
nh nh nh nh nh n h and if ṭhẹ losẹrs arẹ noṭ compẹnsaṭẹd, frẹẹ
nh nh nh n h nh nh nh nh



©MCGRAW nhHILL nhLLC. nhALL nhRIGHṬS nhRẸSẸRVẸD. nhNO nhRẸPRODUCṬION nhOR nhDISṬRIBUṬION nhWIṬHOUṬ nhṬHẸ nhPRIOR nhWRIṬṬẸN nhCONSẸNṬ nhOF nhMCGRAW
nhHILL nhLLC

, ṭradẹ may facẹs poliṭical opposiṭion from ṭhẹm.
nh nh nh nh nh nh nh




©MCGRAW nhHILL nhLLC. nhALL nhRIGHṬS nhRẸSẸRVẸD. nhNO nhRẸPRODUCṬION nhOR nhDISṬRIBUṬION nhWIṬHOUṬ nhṬHẸ nhPRIOR nhWRIṬṬẸN nhCONSẸNṬ nhOF nhMCGRAW
nhHILL nhLLC