Louisiana Bar Examination—Attorney
Licensing Questions And Correct
Answers (Verified Answers) Plus
Rationales 2026 Q&A | Instant
Download Pdf
1. Under Louisiana law, which statement most accurately describes
the distinction between a suspensive condition and a resolutory
condition?
A. A suspensive condition terminates an existing obligation, while a
resolutory condition creates an obligation.
B. A suspensive condition affects only the remedy available to an
obligee.
C. A suspensive condition suspends the effects of an obligation until the
condition occurs, while a resolutory condition causes an obligation to
terminate when the condition occurs.
D. A suspensive condition is always presumed to have occurred, while a
resolutory condition is always presumed not to occur.
Answer: C. A suspensive condition suspends the effects of an
obligation until the condition occurs, while a resolutory condition
causes an obligation to terminate when the condition occurs.
Rationale: A suspensive condition makes the obligation’s effects
depend on the occurrence of a future and uncertain event. Until that
event occurs, the obligation generally does not become enforceable in
the ordinary manner. A resolutory condition operates differently: the
obligation is effective, but its effects are terminated if the specified
,future and uncertain event occurs. The distinction is important when
determining whether an obligation is presently enforceable or subject
to termination.
2. A Louisiana merchant sells a particular antique table to a buyer.
Before delivery, the seller negligently destroys the table. Which
principle is most directly implicated?
A. The seller's obligation may be extinguished because the specific thing
owed was destroyed without fault.
B. The buyer automatically becomes owner of every replacement table.
C. The seller may substitute any table of similar appearance.
D. The buyer must accept monetary damages only if the seller intended
the destruction.
Answer: A. The seller's obligation may be extinguished because the
specific thing owed was destroyed without fault.
Rationale: Louisiana distinguishes obligations to give a specific thing
from obligations involving generic things. When the object owed is a
determinate thing and it is destroyed without the obligor’s fault before
performance, the obligation may be extinguished because the precise
object no longer exists. If the obligor caused the loss through fault or
after being placed in default, different consequences may apply,
including damages.
3. Which of the following is generally required for a valid contract
under Louisiana law?
A. A written document signed by every contracting party in every case.
B. Capacity, consent, a lawful cause, and a lawful object.
C. Consideration in the technical common-law sense.
D. A notarized instrument regardless of the type of contract.
,Answer: B. Capacity, consent, a lawful cause, and a lawful object.
Rationale: Louisiana contract law is civilian rather than purely
common-law in structure. A contract requires the parties’ capacity,
their consent, a lawful cause, and a lawful object. Louisiana does not
generally use the common-law concept of consideration as an
independent universal requirement. Certain transactions, particularly
those involving immovables or special formalities, may require
additional form.
4. Which statement best describes lesion beyond moiety in Louisiana
law?
A. It applies automatically to every contract in which one party receives
less than expected.
B. It is simply another name for fraud.
C. It permits cancellation of every contract made under economic
pressure.
D. It is an exceptional doctrine that may allow rescission of certain
transactions when the statutory requirements concerning disproportion
are satisfied.
Answer: D. It is an exceptional doctrine that may allow rescission of
certain transactions when the statutory requirements concerning
disproportion are satisfied.
Rationale: Lesion is a distinctive civilian doctrine and is not a general
fairness rule allowing every unfavorable bargain to be rescinded.
Louisiana law recognizes lesion in limited circumstances established
by legislation, historically including certain transactions involving
immovables and particular protected parties. The doctrine should
therefore be analyzed by identifying the transaction, the parties, the
degree of disproportion, and any applicable statutory limitation.
, 5. A person signs a contract because the other party intentionally
threatens immediate and serious physical harm unless the contract
is signed. The threatened party later seeks annulment. The
strongest argument is:
A. The consent was obtained by duress.
B. The contract is automatically converted into a donation.
C. The contract is valid because every signed agreement is irrevocable.
D. The threat is irrelevant unless a third party witnessed it.
Answer: A. The consent was obtained by duress.
Rationale: Louisiana recognizes vices of consent, including error,
fraud, and duress. Duress exists when a person’s consent is improperly
obtained through a threat that causes a reasonable fear of unjust and
considerable injury to a person or property. A serious threat directed at
obtaining contractual consent can therefore undermine consent and
provide grounds for annulment under the Civil Code.
6. Under Louisiana property law, ownership generally includes which
bundle of rights?
A. Only possession and use.
B. Only the right to sell.
C. The right to use, enjoy, and dispose of a thing within the limits
established by law.
D. Only the right to exclude governmental regulation.
Answer: C. The right to use, enjoy, and dispose of a thing within the
limits established by law.
Rationale: Ownership is the most comprehensive real right that a
person can have in a thing. It ordinarily includes the right to use and
enjoy the thing and to dispose of it. Ownership is nevertheless subject
Licensing Questions And Correct
Answers (Verified Answers) Plus
Rationales 2026 Q&A | Instant
Download Pdf
1. Under Louisiana law, which statement most accurately describes
the distinction between a suspensive condition and a resolutory
condition?
A. A suspensive condition terminates an existing obligation, while a
resolutory condition creates an obligation.
B. A suspensive condition affects only the remedy available to an
obligee.
C. A suspensive condition suspends the effects of an obligation until the
condition occurs, while a resolutory condition causes an obligation to
terminate when the condition occurs.
D. A suspensive condition is always presumed to have occurred, while a
resolutory condition is always presumed not to occur.
Answer: C. A suspensive condition suspends the effects of an
obligation until the condition occurs, while a resolutory condition
causes an obligation to terminate when the condition occurs.
Rationale: A suspensive condition makes the obligation’s effects
depend on the occurrence of a future and uncertain event. Until that
event occurs, the obligation generally does not become enforceable in
the ordinary manner. A resolutory condition operates differently: the
obligation is effective, but its effects are terminated if the specified
,future and uncertain event occurs. The distinction is important when
determining whether an obligation is presently enforceable or subject
to termination.
2. A Louisiana merchant sells a particular antique table to a buyer.
Before delivery, the seller negligently destroys the table. Which
principle is most directly implicated?
A. The seller's obligation may be extinguished because the specific thing
owed was destroyed without fault.
B. The buyer automatically becomes owner of every replacement table.
C. The seller may substitute any table of similar appearance.
D. The buyer must accept monetary damages only if the seller intended
the destruction.
Answer: A. The seller's obligation may be extinguished because the
specific thing owed was destroyed without fault.
Rationale: Louisiana distinguishes obligations to give a specific thing
from obligations involving generic things. When the object owed is a
determinate thing and it is destroyed without the obligor’s fault before
performance, the obligation may be extinguished because the precise
object no longer exists. If the obligor caused the loss through fault or
after being placed in default, different consequences may apply,
including damages.
3. Which of the following is generally required for a valid contract
under Louisiana law?
A. A written document signed by every contracting party in every case.
B. Capacity, consent, a lawful cause, and a lawful object.
C. Consideration in the technical common-law sense.
D. A notarized instrument regardless of the type of contract.
,Answer: B. Capacity, consent, a lawful cause, and a lawful object.
Rationale: Louisiana contract law is civilian rather than purely
common-law in structure. A contract requires the parties’ capacity,
their consent, a lawful cause, and a lawful object. Louisiana does not
generally use the common-law concept of consideration as an
independent universal requirement. Certain transactions, particularly
those involving immovables or special formalities, may require
additional form.
4. Which statement best describes lesion beyond moiety in Louisiana
law?
A. It applies automatically to every contract in which one party receives
less than expected.
B. It is simply another name for fraud.
C. It permits cancellation of every contract made under economic
pressure.
D. It is an exceptional doctrine that may allow rescission of certain
transactions when the statutory requirements concerning disproportion
are satisfied.
Answer: D. It is an exceptional doctrine that may allow rescission of
certain transactions when the statutory requirements concerning
disproportion are satisfied.
Rationale: Lesion is a distinctive civilian doctrine and is not a general
fairness rule allowing every unfavorable bargain to be rescinded.
Louisiana law recognizes lesion in limited circumstances established
by legislation, historically including certain transactions involving
immovables and particular protected parties. The doctrine should
therefore be analyzed by identifying the transaction, the parties, the
degree of disproportion, and any applicable statutory limitation.
, 5. A person signs a contract because the other party intentionally
threatens immediate and serious physical harm unless the contract
is signed. The threatened party later seeks annulment. The
strongest argument is:
A. The consent was obtained by duress.
B. The contract is automatically converted into a donation.
C. The contract is valid because every signed agreement is irrevocable.
D. The threat is irrelevant unless a third party witnessed it.
Answer: A. The consent was obtained by duress.
Rationale: Louisiana recognizes vices of consent, including error,
fraud, and duress. Duress exists when a person’s consent is improperly
obtained through a threat that causes a reasonable fear of unjust and
considerable injury to a person or property. A serious threat directed at
obtaining contractual consent can therefore undermine consent and
provide grounds for annulment under the Civil Code.
6. Under Louisiana property law, ownership generally includes which
bundle of rights?
A. Only possession and use.
B. Only the right to sell.
C. The right to use, enjoy, and dispose of a thing within the limits
established by law.
D. Only the right to exclude governmental regulation.
Answer: C. The right to use, enjoy, and dispose of a thing within the
limits established by law.
Rationale: Ownership is the most comprehensive real right that a
person can have in a thing. It ordinarily includes the right to use and
enjoy the thing and to dispose of it. Ownership is nevertheless subject
