QUESTION 1
1.1. Based on the interaction between Sarah, Sipho and Linh, what is intercultural
communication?
Based on the interaction between Sarah, Sipho, and Linh, intercultural communication is the process
of exchanging information and meaning between individuals from different cultural backgrounds,
where their cultural identities, values, and communication styles significantly influence the
interaction. In this scenario, the misunderstandings and frustrations arise precisely because Sarah,
Sipho, and Linh interpret professional behaviour, assertiveness, and respect through different cultural
lenses, highlighting that intercultural communication involves navigating these differences to
achieve mutual understanding (Gudykunst & Kim, 2003).
1.2. Identify and define the building blocks of intercultural communication present in this
scenario. For each building block, provide examples from the scenario.
The building blocks of intercultural communication are the fundamental components that shape and
define interactions between people from different cultures. The following building blocks are clearly
present in the "One-Voice" Project scenario:
1. Culture
Definition: Culture is the complex system of shared values, beliefs, norms, and practices that
are learned and transmitted within a specific group, shaping how its members perceive the
world and communicate (Hofstede, 2001).
Example from the Scenario: The American professional culture, as exemplified by Sarah,
values directness, assertiveness, and open debate as a path to innovation. In contrast, the
Vietnamese culture, represented by Linh, values politeness, reserve, and respect for hierarchy,
which makes Sarah's "assertive" tone feel disrespectful. Similarly, Sipho's preference for a
"respectful, consensus-based approach" reflects a communication style often associated with
many South African cultures (Jandt, 2021).
2. Communication Style
Definition: This refers to the preferred ways in which individuals from a culture send and
receive messages. It can be broadly categorised as direct (explicit and verbal) or indirect
(implicit and reliant on context) (Hall, 1976).
Example from the Scenario: Sarah demonstrates a direct communication style by stating she
expects everyone to be "blunt and assertive." The American team members are "very direct and
quick to express their opinions," which they see as positive. However, Linh and the
Vietnamese team members exhibit a more indirect communication style, shown by "nodding
and smiling but not openly disagreeing," which is a way to maintain harmony and avoid direct
confrontation. Sipho's frustration with Sarah's directness also indicates his preference for a
more indirect, consensus-based approach.