MPRE Practice Exam Questions And
Correct Answers (Verified Answers)
Plus Rationales 2026 Q&A | Instant
Download Pdf
1. A lawyer represents a client in a civil action. The client tells the
lawyer that he intends to commit a crime that will cause substantial
financial loss to a third party. Under the Model Rules, may the
lawyer reveal the client's statement?
A. No, because all client communications are absolutely confidential.
B. Yes, because the lawyer may reveal information reasonably necessary
to prevent certain future crimes or frauds.
C. No, unless the third party first obtains a subpoena.
D. Yes, but only if the lawyer has already withdrawn from
representation.
Answer: B. Yes, because the lawyer may reveal information
reasonably necessary to prevent certain future crimes or frauds.
Rationale: The duty of confidentiality generally prohibits disclosure of
information relating to representation. However, the Model Rules
permit disclosure when reasonably necessary to prevent reasonably
certain death or substantial bodily harm and, in specified
circumstances, to prevent or mitigate substantial financial injury
resulting from a client's crime or fraud involving the lawyer's services.
2. A prospective client consults a lawyer about a potential lawsuit but
never retains the lawyer. During the consultation, the prospective
, client reveals confidential information. May the lawyer generally
use or reveal that information?
A. Yes, because no attorney-client relationship was formed.
B. Yes, if the lawyer did not charge a consultation fee.
C. No, the lawyer owes confidentiality duties to prospective clients as
well.
D. No, but only if the prospective client signed a confidentiality
agreement.
Answer: C. No, the lawyer owes confidentiality duties to prospective
clients as well.
Rationale: A lawyer's duties concerning information obtained from a
prospective client can arise even when no attorney-client relationship
is formed. The lawyer generally may not use or reveal information
learned during the consultation, subject to the applicable exceptions.
3. A lawyer learns from a client that the client previously committed
a robbery. The client is no longer planning criminal conduct. May
the lawyer reveal the information solely because the crime was
serious?
A. Yes, because serious crimes are never protected.
B. Yes, because criminal conduct is not confidential.
C. No, absent an applicable exception to confidentiality.
D. No, unless the lawyer believes the client will commit another
robbery.
Answer: C. No, absent an applicable exception to confidentiality.
Rationale: Information relating to representation remains protected
even when it concerns past criminal conduct. The fact that conduct
was criminal does not itself authorize disclosure. A lawyer must
,identify a specific exception permitting disclosure before revealing
protected information.
4. A lawyer is considering whether to withdraw from representing a
client because the client insists on using the lawyer's services to
perpetrate a fraud. What is the most appropriate course?
A. Continue representation because withdrawal is never permitted.
B. Withdraw where required or permitted and, when appropriate, take
reasonable steps to protect the client's interests.
C. Publicly accuse the client of fraud.
D. Immediately disclose every confidential fact to opposing counsel.
Answer: B. Withdraw where required or permitted and, when
appropriate, take reasonable steps to protect the client's interests.
Rationale: A lawyer generally may not assist a client in fraudulent
conduct. Depending on the circumstances, withdrawal may be
required or permitted. The lawyer should comply with applicable
withdrawal procedures and protect the client's interests to the extent
reasonably practicable.
5. A client asks a lawyer to conceal a material fact from a court. The
lawyer knows the proposed conduct would violate the lawyer's
professional obligations. What should the lawyer do?
A. Follow the client's instruction because the client controls all
decisions.
B. Assist the client if the lawyer believes the court will not discover the
concealment.
C. Refuse to assist in the misconduct and take appropriate steps required
by the rules.
D. Withdraw silently and destroy the relevant file.
, Answer: C. Refuse to assist in the misconduct and take appropriate
steps required by the rules.
Rationale: A lawyer's duty of candor to a tribunal overrides a client's
instruction to engage in prohibited deception. Client autonomy does
not authorize a lawyer to violate professional rules. The lawyer must
not knowingly make false statements or assist fraudulent conduct
before the tribunal.
6. A lawyer is representing a criminal defendant. The defendant tells
the lawyer that he committed the charged offense but insists on
pleading not guilty. May the lawyer represent the defendant?
A. No, because a lawyer may represent only clients who claim
innocence.
B. Yes, because a defendant is entitled to require the prosecution to
prove the charges.
C. No, unless the prosecutor agrees.
D. Yes, but only if the lawyer tells the jury the client is innocent.
Answer: B. Yes, because a defendant is entitled to require the
prosecution to prove the charges.
Rationale: A criminal defense lawyer may represent a defendant who
admits guilt to the lawyer. The lawyer may require the prosecution to
prove every element of the offense but may not present evidence or
arguments the lawyer knows are false, subject to the special rules
governing criminal proceedings.
7. A lawyer receives confidential information from Client A. Later,
another client asks the lawyer to represent the opposing party in a
matter substantially related to Client A's representation. What is the
principal concern?
Correct Answers (Verified Answers)
Plus Rationales 2026 Q&A | Instant
Download Pdf
1. A lawyer represents a client in a civil action. The client tells the
lawyer that he intends to commit a crime that will cause substantial
financial loss to a third party. Under the Model Rules, may the
lawyer reveal the client's statement?
A. No, because all client communications are absolutely confidential.
B. Yes, because the lawyer may reveal information reasonably necessary
to prevent certain future crimes or frauds.
C. No, unless the third party first obtains a subpoena.
D. Yes, but only if the lawyer has already withdrawn from
representation.
Answer: B. Yes, because the lawyer may reveal information
reasonably necessary to prevent certain future crimes or frauds.
Rationale: The duty of confidentiality generally prohibits disclosure of
information relating to representation. However, the Model Rules
permit disclosure when reasonably necessary to prevent reasonably
certain death or substantial bodily harm and, in specified
circumstances, to prevent or mitigate substantial financial injury
resulting from a client's crime or fraud involving the lawyer's services.
2. A prospective client consults a lawyer about a potential lawsuit but
never retains the lawyer. During the consultation, the prospective
, client reveals confidential information. May the lawyer generally
use or reveal that information?
A. Yes, because no attorney-client relationship was formed.
B. Yes, if the lawyer did not charge a consultation fee.
C. No, the lawyer owes confidentiality duties to prospective clients as
well.
D. No, but only if the prospective client signed a confidentiality
agreement.
Answer: C. No, the lawyer owes confidentiality duties to prospective
clients as well.
Rationale: A lawyer's duties concerning information obtained from a
prospective client can arise even when no attorney-client relationship
is formed. The lawyer generally may not use or reveal information
learned during the consultation, subject to the applicable exceptions.
3. A lawyer learns from a client that the client previously committed
a robbery. The client is no longer planning criminal conduct. May
the lawyer reveal the information solely because the crime was
serious?
A. Yes, because serious crimes are never protected.
B. Yes, because criminal conduct is not confidential.
C. No, absent an applicable exception to confidentiality.
D. No, unless the lawyer believes the client will commit another
robbery.
Answer: C. No, absent an applicable exception to confidentiality.
Rationale: Information relating to representation remains protected
even when it concerns past criminal conduct. The fact that conduct
was criminal does not itself authorize disclosure. A lawyer must
,identify a specific exception permitting disclosure before revealing
protected information.
4. A lawyer is considering whether to withdraw from representing a
client because the client insists on using the lawyer's services to
perpetrate a fraud. What is the most appropriate course?
A. Continue representation because withdrawal is never permitted.
B. Withdraw where required or permitted and, when appropriate, take
reasonable steps to protect the client's interests.
C. Publicly accuse the client of fraud.
D. Immediately disclose every confidential fact to opposing counsel.
Answer: B. Withdraw where required or permitted and, when
appropriate, take reasonable steps to protect the client's interests.
Rationale: A lawyer generally may not assist a client in fraudulent
conduct. Depending on the circumstances, withdrawal may be
required or permitted. The lawyer should comply with applicable
withdrawal procedures and protect the client's interests to the extent
reasonably practicable.
5. A client asks a lawyer to conceal a material fact from a court. The
lawyer knows the proposed conduct would violate the lawyer's
professional obligations. What should the lawyer do?
A. Follow the client's instruction because the client controls all
decisions.
B. Assist the client if the lawyer believes the court will not discover the
concealment.
C. Refuse to assist in the misconduct and take appropriate steps required
by the rules.
D. Withdraw silently and destroy the relevant file.
, Answer: C. Refuse to assist in the misconduct and take appropriate
steps required by the rules.
Rationale: A lawyer's duty of candor to a tribunal overrides a client's
instruction to engage in prohibited deception. Client autonomy does
not authorize a lawyer to violate professional rules. The lawyer must
not knowingly make false statements or assist fraudulent conduct
before the tribunal.
6. A lawyer is representing a criminal defendant. The defendant tells
the lawyer that he committed the charged offense but insists on
pleading not guilty. May the lawyer represent the defendant?
A. No, because a lawyer may represent only clients who claim
innocence.
B. Yes, because a defendant is entitled to require the prosecution to
prove the charges.
C. No, unless the prosecutor agrees.
D. Yes, but only if the lawyer tells the jury the client is innocent.
Answer: B. Yes, because a defendant is entitled to require the
prosecution to prove the charges.
Rationale: A criminal defense lawyer may represent a defendant who
admits guilt to the lawyer. The lawyer may require the prosecution to
prove every element of the offense but may not present evidence or
arguments the lawyer knows are false, subject to the special rules
governing criminal proceedings.
7. A lawyer receives confidential information from Client A. Later,
another client asks the lawyer to represent the opposing party in a
matter substantially related to Client A's representation. What is the
principal concern?
