Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 12 pages
Exam (elaborations)

PHIL101 Final Exam Questions with Verified Correct Answers

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 12 pages

PHIL101 Final Exam Questions with Verified Correct Answers

Content preview

PHIL101 Final Exam Questions with Verified
Correct Answers
Ad hominem (appeal to the person)

Attacking the person making an argument rather than the argument itself.

Appeal to emotion

Using emotional manipulation instead of logic to persuade someone.

Appeal to ignorance

Claiming something is true because it hasn't been proven false, or vice versa.

Appeal to pity

Trying to win an argument by making someone feel sorry rather than by reasoning.

Appeal to popularity

Claiming something is true or good simply because many people believe or do it.

Appeal to the person

Same as ad hominem; rejecting a claim based on the source rather than the content.

Appeal to tradition

Arguing something is good or correct simply because it has always been done that way.

Begging the question

Assuming the conclusion in one of the premises; circular reasoning.

Burden of proof

The obligation to provide evidence for a claim; typically falls on whoever makes the claim.

, Composition

Assuming that what is true of the parts must be true of the whole.

Decision-point fallacy

Arguing that because there is no clear line between two extremes, no distinction can be made

at all.

Division

Assuming that what is true of the whole must be true of each of its parts.

Equivocation

Using the same word in two different senses within the same argument.

Euphemisms

Replacing a harsh or direct term with a softer, misleading one to obscure meaning.

Fallacies

Errors in reasoning that make an argument invalid or unreliable.

False dilemma

Presenting only two options as if they are the only possibilities when others exist.

Faulty analogy

Drawing a comparison between two things that are not relevantly similar enough to support

the conclusion.

Genetic fallacy

Rejecting or accepting a claim based solely on its origin or source.

Document information

Uploaded on
August 19, 2026
Number of pages
12
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$12.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
KenAli
2.6
(18)
Sold
114
Followers
5
Items
23897
Last sold
2 days ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions