MPRE PRACTICE EXAMINATION 2026–2027 —
COMPREHENSIVE STUDY GUIDE | LATEST UPDATE
2026/2027 | ACTUAL EXAM PRACTICE QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS | EXAM REVIEW | 100% CORRECT
ANSWERS | VERIFIED SOLUTIONS
This advanced practice examination is designed for law school graduates and
candidates preparing for the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination
(MPRE) required for bar admission in most U.S. jurisdictions. The 100-question test
evaluates knowledge of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct and the ABA
Model Code of Judicial Conduct, emphasizing client confidentiality, conflicts of
interest, fees, duties to the tribunal, advertising and solicitation, judicial ethics,
and unauthorized practice. Each item is written at the application and analysis
level to mirror the cognitive complexity of the actual MPRE, requiring the
examinee to identify the governing rule, apply it to lawyer and judge conduct, and
select the most appropriate ethical resolution. Detailed rationales clarify the
correct answer and explain why distractors are less appropriate. Use this
comprehensive review to assess readiness, identify knowledge gaps, and
strengthen ethical reasoning for the 2026–2027 MPRE administration.
Table of Contents
I. Regulation of the Legal Profession
II. Client-Lawyer Relationship and Confidentiality
III. Conflicts of Interest
IV. Fees and Client Property
V. Duties to the Tribunal and Third Parties
VI. Advertising, Solicitation, and Firm Names
VII. Judicial Ethics and Canon Compliance
VIII. Unauthorized Practice and Multijurisdictional Practice
IX. Attorney Misconduct and Disciplinary Authority
, 1. A lawyer represents a client in a civil fraud action. During trial preparation,
the client tells the lawyer that she intends to testify falsely about a material
issue. The lawyer counsels against perjury, but the client insists. Which
action is most consistent with the lawyer’s ethical obligations?
A) Withdraw immediately and notify the court of the client’s intended
perjury
B) Continue the representation and call the client to testify, but do not ask
about the false matter
C) Seek to withdraw, and if withdrawal is not permitted, disclose the client’s
intent to the tribunal only as necessary to avoid assisting the fraud
D) Refuse to call the client as a witness and continue to represent her on
other issues without disclosing the perjury
Correct Answer: C
Model Rule 3.3 requires candor toward the tribunal. If a client insists on testifying
falsely, the lawyer must take remedial measures, including disclosure to the
tribunal if necessary, after attempting to withdraw. Option A prematurely discloses
without first seeking withdrawal. Option B and D fail to prevent the fraud.
2. An attorney receives a disciplinary complaint alleging a violation of a
professional rule. During the investigation, the attorney provides
documents and testimony to the disciplinary authority. Which of the
following is protected from disclosure under the attorney-client privilege in
the disciplinary proceeding?
A) The client’s confidential communications to the attorney that are directly
related to the alleged violation
B) The attorney’s billing records showing the amount of fees charged to the
client
C) The identity of the client who filed the complaint
D) None of the above; disciplinary authorities have absolute access to all
client information
Correct Answer: A
Model Rule 1.6(b)(5) permits disclosure to establish a defense in a controversy
,with a client, but the attorney-client privilege still protects confidential
communications unless the client waives. Billing records may be privileged if they
reveal confidential purpose, but identity is generally not privileged. Disciplinary
authorities do not have absolute access.
3. A lawyer is appointed to represent an indigent criminal defendant. After
meeting with the client, the lawyer believes the client’s case is meritless
and the client refuses to plead guilty. What is the lawyer’s ethical
obligation?
A) Withdraw because the case is frivolous
B) Continue to represent the client and present the defense as the client
wishes, subject to candor to the tribunal
C) Refuse to file any motions because the case is meritless
D) Tell the court the case is frivolous and request dismissal
Correct Answer: B
A lawyer may represent a client with a defense even if the lawyer believes it lacks
merit; the client has a right to plead not guilty and require proof beyond a
reasonable doubt. The lawyer cannot disclose that the case is meritless. The
lawyer must be candid but may present the client’s defense without suborning
perjury.
4. A law firm uses a website that contains client testimonials and statements
that the firm “gets the largest settlements in the state.” The statements are
not factually substantiated. Which Model Rule is most directly implicated?
A) Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information
B) Rule 1.8 Conflict of Interest
C) Rule 7.1 Communications Concerning a Lawyer’s Services
D) Rule 5.5 Unauthorized Practice of Law
Correct Answer: C
Rule 7.1 prohibits false or misleading communications about a lawyer’s services.
Unsubstantiated comparisons and testimonials implying results are misleading.
Confidentiality and conflict rules do not apply. Unauthorized practice involves
nonlawyers, not advertising content.
, 5. A judge is presiding over a case in which a party is represented by the
judge’s former law partner. The judge’s former partner left the firm five
years ago, and the judge has no financial interest in the firm. What must the
judge do?
A) Disqualify himself from the case
B) Disclose the relationship on the record and, if all parties and lawyers
agree, may proceed
C) Nothing, because the relationship ended more than three years ago
D) Preside over the case only if no party objects
Correct Answer: A
Under the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct, a judge must disqualify himself if a
party’s lawyer is a former partner or associate of the judge and the judge had a
professional relationship with that lawyer within the preceding three years. If the
relationship ended five years ago, disqualification is not automatic, but the judge
must still assess impartiality. However, the rule requires disqualification if the
judge has a personal bias or if the former partner is involved. Here, because more
than three years elapsed, disqualification is not mandatory solely on that ground,
but option C is too absolute because the judge may still need to recuse if
impartiality is questioned. The best answer is to evaluate. Actually, Model Code
Canon 3E(1)(d) requires disqualification if a party’s lawyer is a former partner or
associate and the judge served as a partner or associate within the preceding
three years. Since five years elapsed, the automatic disqualification does not
apply. The judge should still disclose on the record and may proceed if no
reasonable question of impartiality. Thus, B is the best answer.
Correct Answer: B
Under Canon 3E(1)(d), automatic disqualification applies only if the former
partnership ended within three years. Since five years elapsed, the judge is not
automatically disqualified but must disclose the relationship on the record. If the
parties and lawyers agree after disclosure, the judge may proceed unless there are
other grounds for recusal.
COMPREHENSIVE STUDY GUIDE | LATEST UPDATE
2026/2027 | ACTUAL EXAM PRACTICE QUESTIONS
AND ANSWERS | EXAM REVIEW | 100% CORRECT
ANSWERS | VERIFIED SOLUTIONS
This advanced practice examination is designed for law school graduates and
candidates preparing for the Multistate Professional Responsibility Examination
(MPRE) required for bar admission in most U.S. jurisdictions. The 100-question test
evaluates knowledge of the ABA Model Rules of Professional Conduct and the ABA
Model Code of Judicial Conduct, emphasizing client confidentiality, conflicts of
interest, fees, duties to the tribunal, advertising and solicitation, judicial ethics,
and unauthorized practice. Each item is written at the application and analysis
level to mirror the cognitive complexity of the actual MPRE, requiring the
examinee to identify the governing rule, apply it to lawyer and judge conduct, and
select the most appropriate ethical resolution. Detailed rationales clarify the
correct answer and explain why distractors are less appropriate. Use this
comprehensive review to assess readiness, identify knowledge gaps, and
strengthen ethical reasoning for the 2026–2027 MPRE administration.
Table of Contents
I. Regulation of the Legal Profession
II. Client-Lawyer Relationship and Confidentiality
III. Conflicts of Interest
IV. Fees and Client Property
V. Duties to the Tribunal and Third Parties
VI. Advertising, Solicitation, and Firm Names
VII. Judicial Ethics and Canon Compliance
VIII. Unauthorized Practice and Multijurisdictional Practice
IX. Attorney Misconduct and Disciplinary Authority
, 1. A lawyer represents a client in a civil fraud action. During trial preparation,
the client tells the lawyer that she intends to testify falsely about a material
issue. The lawyer counsels against perjury, but the client insists. Which
action is most consistent with the lawyer’s ethical obligations?
A) Withdraw immediately and notify the court of the client’s intended
perjury
B) Continue the representation and call the client to testify, but do not ask
about the false matter
C) Seek to withdraw, and if withdrawal is not permitted, disclose the client’s
intent to the tribunal only as necessary to avoid assisting the fraud
D) Refuse to call the client as a witness and continue to represent her on
other issues without disclosing the perjury
Correct Answer: C
Model Rule 3.3 requires candor toward the tribunal. If a client insists on testifying
falsely, the lawyer must take remedial measures, including disclosure to the
tribunal if necessary, after attempting to withdraw. Option A prematurely discloses
without first seeking withdrawal. Option B and D fail to prevent the fraud.
2. An attorney receives a disciplinary complaint alleging a violation of a
professional rule. During the investigation, the attorney provides
documents and testimony to the disciplinary authority. Which of the
following is protected from disclosure under the attorney-client privilege in
the disciplinary proceeding?
A) The client’s confidential communications to the attorney that are directly
related to the alleged violation
B) The attorney’s billing records showing the amount of fees charged to the
client
C) The identity of the client who filed the complaint
D) None of the above; disciplinary authorities have absolute access to all
client information
Correct Answer: A
Model Rule 1.6(b)(5) permits disclosure to establish a defense in a controversy
,with a client, but the attorney-client privilege still protects confidential
communications unless the client waives. Billing records may be privileged if they
reveal confidential purpose, but identity is generally not privileged. Disciplinary
authorities do not have absolute access.
3. A lawyer is appointed to represent an indigent criminal defendant. After
meeting with the client, the lawyer believes the client’s case is meritless
and the client refuses to plead guilty. What is the lawyer’s ethical
obligation?
A) Withdraw because the case is frivolous
B) Continue to represent the client and present the defense as the client
wishes, subject to candor to the tribunal
C) Refuse to file any motions because the case is meritless
D) Tell the court the case is frivolous and request dismissal
Correct Answer: B
A lawyer may represent a client with a defense even if the lawyer believes it lacks
merit; the client has a right to plead not guilty and require proof beyond a
reasonable doubt. The lawyer cannot disclose that the case is meritless. The
lawyer must be candid but may present the client’s defense without suborning
perjury.
4. A law firm uses a website that contains client testimonials and statements
that the firm “gets the largest settlements in the state.” The statements are
not factually substantiated. Which Model Rule is most directly implicated?
A) Rule 1.6 Confidentiality of Information
B) Rule 1.8 Conflict of Interest
C) Rule 7.1 Communications Concerning a Lawyer’s Services
D) Rule 5.5 Unauthorized Practice of Law
Correct Answer: C
Rule 7.1 prohibits false or misleading communications about a lawyer’s services.
Unsubstantiated comparisons and testimonials implying results are misleading.
Confidentiality and conflict rules do not apply. Unauthorized practice involves
nonlawyers, not advertising content.
, 5. A judge is presiding over a case in which a party is represented by the
judge’s former law partner. The judge’s former partner left the firm five
years ago, and the judge has no financial interest in the firm. What must the
judge do?
A) Disqualify himself from the case
B) Disclose the relationship on the record and, if all parties and lawyers
agree, may proceed
C) Nothing, because the relationship ended more than three years ago
D) Preside over the case only if no party objects
Correct Answer: A
Under the ABA Model Code of Judicial Conduct, a judge must disqualify himself if a
party’s lawyer is a former partner or associate of the judge and the judge had a
professional relationship with that lawyer within the preceding three years. If the
relationship ended five years ago, disqualification is not automatic, but the judge
must still assess impartiality. However, the rule requires disqualification if the
judge has a personal bias or if the former partner is involved. Here, because more
than three years elapsed, disqualification is not mandatory solely on that ground,
but option C is too absolute because the judge may still need to recuse if
impartiality is questioned. The best answer is to evaluate. Actually, Model Code
Canon 3E(1)(d) requires disqualification if a party’s lawyer is a former partner or
associate and the judge served as a partner or associate within the preceding
three years. Since five years elapsed, the automatic disqualification does not
apply. The judge should still disclose on the record and may proceed if no
reasonable question of impartiality. Thus, B is the best answer.
Correct Answer: B
Under Canon 3E(1)(d), automatic disqualification applies only if the former
partnership ended within three years. Since five years elapsed, the judge is not
automatically disqualified but must disclose the relationship on the record. If the
parties and lawyers agree after disclosure, the judge may proceed unless there are
other grounds for recusal.
