Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 32 pages
Summary

Summary Practice Tests, Open and Multiple Choice Questions | Private International Law | KU Leuven |

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 32 pages

Also available in Bundle! This collection of multiple choice questions covers core topics in Private International Law at KU Leuven's Master in de rechten program. The questions address key concepts including SLAPPs, the European Insolvency Regulation, EU treaty developments (Maastricht, Amsterdam, Lisbon), the Brussels Convention, autonomous interpretation, and post-Brexit jurisdictional issues. Ideal for exam preparation and self-testing, these questions help reinforce understanding of EU PIL instruments, procedural rules, and the legal framework governing cross-border civil disputes.

Content preview

,MULTIPLE CHOICE QUESTIONS

Question 1: What is the primary intent behind Strategic Lawsuits Against Public
Participation (SLAPP)?
A) To seek financial compensation for damage to a corporate brand.
B) To censor, intimidate, or silence critics through the burden of legal costs.
C) To resolve complex cross-border employment disputes fairly.
D) To establish a uniform global standard for environmental protection.

Question 2: In the context of the European Insolvency Regulation (EIR), what is a key
objective of coordinating proceedings?
A) To allow companies to relocate their assets to tax havens.
B) To ensure that creditors are only paid if they are domiciled in the EU.
C) To prevent 'insolvency tourism' and ensure fair distribution of assets.
D) To grant parent companies immunity from the debts of their subsidiaries.

Question 3: How are 'secondary procedures' limited under the European Insolvency
Regulation?
A) They apply only to the assets located within the territory where the procedure is
opened.
B) They can only be initiated by the debtor, never by the creditors.
C) They automatically supersede any main proceedings initiated in another state.
D) They are exempt from the principle of mutual recognition.

Question 4: Under the Maastricht Treaty, within which 'pillar' was judicial cooperation in
civil matters originally placed?
A) The European Community (First Pillar).
B) Common Foreign and Security Policy (Second Pillar).
C) Justice and Home Affairs (Third Pillar).
D) The European Economic Area (Fourth Pillar).

Question 5: What significant change did the Treaty of Amsterdam bring to Private
International Law (PIL) in the EU?
A) It abolished the need for any cross-border jurisdictional rules.
B) It moved PIL from intergovernmental cooperation to the supranational community
pillar.
C) It granted the UK and Ireland a permanent and mandatory opt-in to all PIL measures.
D) It established the first global court for private commercial disputes.

Question 6: Under the Treaty of Lisbon, which concept replaced the 'internal market' as
the primary trigger for PIL development?
A) The Eurozone financial stability protocol.
B) The concept of EU citizenship within an Area of Freedom, Security, and Justice.
C) The principle of absolute sovereign immunity for all Member States.
D) The requirement for a common language in all judicial proceedings.



2

,Question 7: Which legislative procedure is required for the adoption of EU family law
measures with cross-border implications?
A) A special legislative procedure requiring unanimity in the Council.
B) A simple majority vote in the European Parliament.
C) An executive order from the President of the European Commission.
D) A referendum held across all 27 Member States.

Question 8: How does Denmark typically apply EU Private International Law instruments
despite its 'opt-out' status?
A) By passing identical national laws without referring to the EU.
B) By entering into separate parallel agreements with the European Union.
C) By allowing the CJEU to rule on Danish domestic cases by default.
D) By joining the EFTA and using only the Lugano Convention.

Question 9: Following Brexit, what is the status of 'Acquired EU Law' in the United
Kingdom regarding judicial referrals?
A) UK courts can still refer questions to the CJEU for a final ruling.
B) The CJEU must approve all UK Supreme Court decisions in civil matters.
C) Referrals are mandatory for cases involving EU citizens in the UK.
D) UK courts no longer have the authority to refer questions to the CJEU.

Question 10: What is the historical significance of the 1968 Brussels Convention (EEX
Convention)?
A) It served as the foundation for the current European jurisdictional rules for six
founding states.
B) It was the first treaty to establish a common European currency.
C) It abolished all national courts in favor of a central European tribunal.
D) It was primarily a human rights treaty that excluded commercial matters.

Question 11: In Private International Law theory, what does 'mission creep' describe
regarding the Brussels regime?
A) The reduction of EU influence in national family law disputes.
B) The evolution from a simple enforcement treaty to a comprehensive system of
jurisdiction.
C) The failure of the CJEU to interpret commercial contracts consistently.
D) The shift of PIL rules toward public administrative law.

Question 12: Why is 'arbitration' specifically excluded from the scope of the Brussels Ia
Regulation?
A) Because it is considered a matter of public administrative law.
B) Because it is already governed by the 1958 New York Convention.
C) Because EU Member States have not yet agreed on a definition of arbitration.
D) Because arbitration awards are not legally binding in the EU.

Question 13: Which connecting factor did Savigny identify as 'natural' for determining the
validity of a marriage?
A) Lex loci celebrationis (the law of the place where the marriage is celebrated).
B) Lex voluntatis (the law chosen by the couple).

3

, C) Lex patriae (the law of the husband's nationality only).
D) Lex fori (the law of the court hearing the divorce).

Question 14: What is meant by the 'putative law of the contract' in Private International
Law?
A) The law of the state with the highest tax rate affecting the parties.
B) The legal system that would have applied had the contract been successfully formed.
C) A non-state body of law that is always used to override national statutes.
D) The law of the country where the defendant was born.

Question 15: What is a 'traite double' (double treaty) in the context of international
litigation?
A) A treaty that covers both civil and criminal law matters.
B) A convention that contains unified rules for both direct jurisdiction and recognition of
judgments.
C) An agreement between two states to ignore EU regulations.
D) A contract that specifies two different governing laws for one agreement.

Question 16: Which formal legal mechanism was abolished by the Brussels Ibis
Regulation to simplify enforcement?
A) The exequatur procedure.
B) The right to appeal to a national supreme court.
C) The requirement for written contracts in commercial trade.
D) The use of autonomous interpretation by the CJEU.

Question 17: How does the principle of 'sound administration of justice' justify the joinder
of claims?
A) By allowing judges to choose the law that they find easiest to apply.
B) By ensuring related cases are heard together to avoid conflicting judgments.
C) By requiring all defendants to be sued in the claimant's home country.
D) By prioritizing the claims of public authorities over private parties.

Question 18: Under Article 31(2) of Brussels Ibis, what happens when an exclusive
choice-of-court agreement is contested?
A) The court first seized always maintains jurisdiction regardless of the agreement.
B) The chosen court rules on its jurisdiction first, even if it was second to be seized.
C) The case is automatically referred to the CJEU for a determination of domicile.
D) The parties must abandon the court and move to international arbitration.

Question 19: What was established by the ruling in the Turner case regarding anti-suit
injunctions?
A) They are prohibited between Member States because they violate the principle of
mutual trust.
B) They are encouraged as a way to prevent forum shopping in the EU.
C) They can only be issued by the court in the state where the damage occurred.
D) They apply only to disputes involving non-EU companies.


4

Document information

Study
Uploaded on
August 10, 2026
Number of pages
32
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Summary
$9.11

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
StudieBegrip
4.7
(106)
Sold
456
Followers
7
Items
172
Last sold
1 day ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions