Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 10 pages
Summary

Summary EPQ [Full Marks] Mid-Project Review A* Extreme Detail

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 10 pages

A completed example of the Mid-Project Review section of an AQA Level 3 EPQ production log, showing how a candidate reviews their progress partway through the project. Can be used for all exam boards. Includes: Review of progress against the original plan Reflection on research undertaken so far Evaluation of time management and project organisation Consideration of challenges and changes to the original plans Example of how progress can be reviewed and evaluated *THIS EPQ HAS ALREADY BEEN SUBMITTED SO MAY NOT BE COPIED OR USED FOR ANY INTENTS OR PURPOSES. *

Content preview

Mid-Project Review
To be completed by the candidate. This page records your outline plan when you have completed
your research.

Is my project following my original plan? How has my plan developed?


I aimed for my project to focus on mathematics, by investigating some of the most prominent
contributors and exploring how they have impacted contemporary mathematics. I had planned
to focus my project on uncovering who the Vienna Circle were and how their contributions
influenced contemporary mathematics. After extensive research, this plan has been adapted to
fit the scope and feasibility of my project. Instead of focusing solely on mathematics, I have
expanded to focus on mathematical philosophy as well. This ensures that I can gain a broader
understanding of the Vienna Circle’s work whilst guaranteeing that I meet my project aims.
Primary and Secondary Resources
I have successfully maintained a critical record of my sources, via my source evaluation table.
Below is an update from the planning review.




This will be particularly beneficial when I begin writing my report as I am able to compile and
reference my research efficiently. In my table, I have included a column to summarise the
information from the sources that I believed were most relevant to my project. By streamlining
this information, it is easier to find particular pieces of information to write about, which has
decreased the time I spend re-reading my notes to find the relevant information. The organised
documentation of my sources means I am able to present a well-structured and thoroughly
supported report, thereby increasing the overall credibility of my work.
This systematic approach has significantly simplified the way I conduct my primary research.
By keeping a record of the information I gained from each author, I can quickly refer back to
this to pinpoint specific questions for each author. This reduced the time I spent writing emails

, to experts in the field of Austrian Mathematics and Philosophy, and consequently, I was able to
reach out to more professors than I had intended to.
In addition to my secondary literature research, I have written an email that I am sending out to
specialists in the field of the Vienna Circle, hoping to gain further insight into the Vienna
Circle which will enrich my project. In the email template, I purposefully left generic sections
highlighted, which I would fill out depending on the recipient. I have also ensured that I
adhered to the ethical and safeguarding policies of my school. An example is shown below.


(embed email template)


In order to efficiently manage the responses I have received, I have created a table that
summarises the key information that I have received. The feedback will constitute a focal point
for my research as the advice is tailored to my project, making it especially relevant and
valuable to my work. To respect the confidentiality of the specialists, I have redacted their
names in the table.




I have encountered a recurring problem when it comes to my secondary research. The majority
of the lengthy articles that I would like to read are all restricted with a paywall. To resolve this,
I have reached out to the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) Library to

Document information

Study Level
Subject
Uploaded on
August 10, 2026
Number of pages
10
Written in
2024/2025
Type
Summary
$12.04

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
0
Followers
0
Items
10
Last sold
-



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these revision notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No problem! You can straightaway pick a different document that better suits what you're after.

Pay as you like, start learning straight away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and smashed it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions