INVESTIGATOR EXAM – QUESTIONS AND
ANSWERS
VERIFIED AND WELL DETAILED ANSWERS | PLUS
RATIONALES | GUARANTEED PASS | LATEST EXAM
UPDATE
1. An investigator is reviewing a case where a city employee submitted
false timesheets for 6 months. The employee claims it was an "honest
mistake." What element must the investigator establish to prove
fraud?
A) That the employee was overpaid
B) Intent to deceive
C) That the supervisor approved the timesheets
D) That the amount exceeded $1,000
Rationale: Fraud requires intent to deceive. An honest mistake, even if it
results in overpayment, does not constitute fraud without evidence of
intentional deception. The investigator must establish that the employee
knowingly submitted false information.
2. A fraud investigator receives a complaint that a vendor is
overcharging the city. What is the FIRST step in the investigation
process?
A) Confront the vendor immediately
B) Conduct a preliminary assessment to determine if the complaint has
merit
,C) Notify the media
D) Arrest the vendor
Rationale: The first step is always a preliminary assessment to determine if
sufficient evidence exists to justify a formal investigation. This prevents
wasting resources on unsubstantiated complaints.
3. What is the PRIMARY difference between a fraud investigation and
an audit?
A) Audits are always confidential
B) Fraud investigations focus on intentional wrongdoing; audits focus
on compliance and accuracy
C) Investigations are conducted by accountants
D) Audits require warrants
Rationale: Audits focus on compliance with laws, regulations, and policies,
and may identify errors or weaknesses. Fraud investigations specifically target
intentional wrongdoing and deceptive conduct.
4. Which of the following is an example of "occupational fraud"?
A) Identity theft by a stranger
B) Credit card fraud by an external hacker
C) An employee embezzling funds from their employer
D) Phishing scams targeting customers
Rationale: Occupational fraud involves the misuse of one's position for
personal gain through organized schemes. It includes asset misappropriation,
corruption, and financial statement fraud committed by employees,
managers, or executives.
,5. A fraud investigator is preparing to interview a witness. Which
approach is MOST effective?
A) Accuse the witness of withholding information
B) Use open-ended questions to gather detailed information
C) Provide the witness with all case details
D) Suggest possible answers to the witness
Rationale: Open-ended questions encourage detailed, narrative responses
and help the investigator gather complete and accurate information. Leading
questions or accusatory approaches can compromise the reliability of the
statement.
6. A city employee uses a city-issued credit card to purchase $2,500 in
personal electronics. The best charge is:
A) Official misconduct
B) Petit larceny
C) Grand larceny and misuse of public property
D) Trespass
Rationale: In New York, grand larceny involves theft of property valued over
$1,000. Using public funds for personal purchases also constitutes misuse of
public property. This is both a theft crime and an ethics violation.
7. Which of the following is considered the MOST reliable type of
evidence in fraud investigations?
, A) Hearsay statements
B) Witness testimony alone
C) Documentary evidence such as bank records and contracts
D) Social media posts
Rationale: Documentary evidence—such as bank statements, invoices,
contracts, and emails—is objective, verifiable, and generally more reliable
than testimony alone. It can be authenticated and provides a paper trail.
8. An investigator learns that a SNAP recipient owns a luxury vehicle
registered in Florida. What does this suggest?
A) No issue because asset limits don't apply
B) Possible residency fraud
C) The recipient won the lottery
D) Standard practice
Rationale: Out-of-state registration of an expensive vehicle, combined with
New York City residency, suggests potential residency fraud. The individual
may actually reside outside New York but continues to collect benefits.
9. Which principle is violated when evidence is not properly labeled or
tracked?
A) The best evidence rule
B) The hearsay rule
C) Chain of custody
D) The exclusionary rule