As a doctoral learner, you need to plan accordingly for your success. In this assignment, you will
revisit the personal and professional goals you submitted in the admissions process and annotate
information in the Learning Enhancement, Advancement, and Direction (LEAD) Framework. You
can make any modifications to reflect your current personal, professional, and academic goals
within the appropriate areas of the grid. Incorporate program outcomes analysis from discussion
responses as relevant. This exercise will help prepare you to write your Individual Student Profile in
Module 5.
Access the Learning Enhancement, Advancement, and Direction (LEAD) Framework . Directions for
Part 1 are included in the document.
This submission does not need to be formatted according to APA; however, you need to include
references. Should you have any questions regarding these criteria, please post your question to the Q&A
Discussion.
Part 2: LEAD Framework Presentation
Develop an audiovisual presentation using the LEAD Grid you developed in Part 1. Present the
ideas in a different way using Jing (Links to an external site.)Links to an external
site., VoiceThread (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., PowerPoint with audio, or
another presentation tool. A list of presentation tools compatible with Canvas are available on the
Module 1 Learning Objects page. This is your chance to practice technical expectations for future
courses. These can be two separate files.
This submission does not need to be formatted according to APA; however, you need to include
references. Should you have any questions regarding these criteria, please post your question to the Q&A
Discussion.
Rubric
Doctoral Assignment Rubric v.2
Doctoral Assignment Rubric v.2
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion
is linked to a 30.0 pts 15.0 pts 0.0 pts
Learning Evidenced scholarly quality: Includes Marginal style: Lacks Limited style: Not
Outcome1. paragraph transitions. Appropriate consistent writing at written at an
Writing Style tone. Range in sentence structure. a scholarly level. acceptable level for a 30.0 pts
Correct use of punctuation and Missing one or two scholar. Missing three
view longer
description
capitalization. Appropriate use of qualities. or more qualities.
threshold: 24.0 pts grammar.
revisit the personal and professional goals you submitted in the admissions process and annotate
information in the Learning Enhancement, Advancement, and Direction (LEAD) Framework. You
can make any modifications to reflect your current personal, professional, and academic goals
within the appropriate areas of the grid. Incorporate program outcomes analysis from discussion
responses as relevant. This exercise will help prepare you to write your Individual Student Profile in
Module 5.
Access the Learning Enhancement, Advancement, and Direction (LEAD) Framework . Directions for
Part 1 are included in the document.
This submission does not need to be formatted according to APA; however, you need to include
references. Should you have any questions regarding these criteria, please post your question to the Q&A
Discussion.
Part 2: LEAD Framework Presentation
Develop an audiovisual presentation using the LEAD Grid you developed in Part 1. Present the
ideas in a different way using Jing (Links to an external site.)Links to an external
site., VoiceThread (Links to an external site.)Links to an external site., PowerPoint with audio, or
another presentation tool. A list of presentation tools compatible with Canvas are available on the
Module 1 Learning Objects page. This is your chance to practice technical expectations for future
courses. These can be two separate files.
This submission does not need to be formatted according to APA; however, you need to include
references. Should you have any questions regarding these criteria, please post your question to the Q&A
Discussion.
Rubric
Doctoral Assignment Rubric v.2
Doctoral Assignment Rubric v.2
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion
is linked to a 30.0 pts 15.0 pts 0.0 pts
Learning Evidenced scholarly quality: Includes Marginal style: Lacks Limited style: Not
Outcome1. paragraph transitions. Appropriate consistent writing at written at an
Writing Style tone. Range in sentence structure. a scholarly level. acceptable level for a 30.0 pts
Correct use of punctuation and Missing one or two scholar. Missing three
view longer
description
capitalization. Appropriate use of qualities. or more qualities.
threshold: 24.0 pts grammar.
