Research Argumentation

RESEARCH ARGUMENTATION 2 1.In your response, make an argument for whether it is better for Waketown to build its new Wake Heights subdivision or to preserve the Wake Wetland Preserve. Use evidence from at least two of the sources below to support your claim. Be sure to introduce your precise claim, develop the claim with evidence from the sources, and demonstrate relationships between ideas. (15 points) In my argument, it more beneficial to attend a four-year university. Would one instead attend a college where it is free and allowed to come out with a job which is dependable or to go straight to the workforce and tussle or struggle all through the years. As the first source is stating, people were quickly making up to 60,000 dollars one year after college. The source is also making it clear that one is in a better position to get a job more than someone with a minor degree or without a degree at all. Looking on the third source, they are stating that, someone without a degree has to make about 20 job applications to get hired whereas that one person who has a degree applies to only eight jobs. Therefore, without a college degree, it could get very stressful in all parts. Nevertheless, some people may decide to go straight in applying for jobs because they are not in a position of paying for college fee. Sometimes they can also feel that they can get a job which is still decent without a diploma. But according to what I think, having a degree will reduce stress for someone and bring a more dependable income. 2. In an essay, a student argues that going straight into the workforce after graduating from high school rather than attending college is the best option for all recent high school graduates. In a source, the student finds this counterclaim to her argument made by a researcher on college success: "individuals with only high school dip