Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 11 pages
Exam (elaborations)

LEG2601 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 - DUE 24 August 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 11 pages

LEG2601 Assignment 1 (ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 - DUE 24 August 2026 ... Green Horizon Developments (Pty) Ltd plans to build a large shopping centre and fuel station near a wetland area outside Polokwane in Limpopo Province. The proposed development will include parking areas, new access roads and a waste disposal site. The company appoints Ms Dube as the environmental assessment practitioner (EAP) to manage the application process. Local community members complain that the development may pollute the wetland and destroy natural habitats. Ms Dube prepares reports for the development but fails to include objections raised by interested and affected parties. After receiving the reports, the competent authority grants the application for environmental authorisation. Green Horizon Developments (Pty) Ltd intends to construct a shopping centre, fuel station, parking areas, access roads and a waste disposal site near a wetland. Discuss whether these proposed activities are likely to require environmental authorisation and explain the purpose of conducting an environmental impact assessment before construction begins. After environmental authorisation was granted, community members remained dissatisfied with the decision. Explain the administrative and judicial remedies available to interested and affected parties who wish to challenge an environmental authorisation, including internal appeal, requests for reasons and judicial review. Green Horizon Developments (Pty) Ltd plans to build a large shopping centre and fuel station near a wetland area outside Polokwane in Limpopo Province. The proposed development will include parking areas, new access roads and a waste disposal site. The company appoints Ms Dube as the environmental assessment practitioner (EAP) to manage the application process. Local community members complain that the development may pollute the wetland and destroy natural habitats. Ms Dube prepares reports for the development but fails to include objections raised by interested and affected parties. After receiving the reports, the competent authority grants the application for environmental authorisation. The competent authority granted environmental authorisation after receiving the reports prepared by Ms Dube. Critically discuss the factors that the competent authority should consider before approving a development that may affect a wetland, including environmental, social, economic and cumulative impacts. Ms Dube failed to include objections raised by interested and affected parties. This is contrary to the principle of just administrative action. Examine the effect that the lack of public participation has on the application submitted to the competent authority. What steps can the local community members, as aggrieved parties, take to challenge the decision. Local community members are concerned that the development may pollute the wetland and destroy natural habitats. Discuss how the principles of sustainable development, pollution prevention and protection of biodiversity should guide the competent authority when deciding whether to grant environmental authorisation. Ms Dube was appointed as the environmental assessment practitioner responsible for preparing the environmental reports and managing the application process. Examine the legal duties of an environmental assessment practitioner and discuss the importance of independence, objectivity and full disclosure during an environmental authorisation application. Green Horizon Developments (Pty) Ltd plans to build a large shopping centre and fuel station near a wetland area outside Polokwane in Limpopo Province. The proposed development will include parking areas, new access roads and a waste disposal site. The company appoints Ms Dube as the environmental assessment practitioner (EAP) to manage the application process. Local community members complain that the development may pollute the wetland and destroy natural habitats. Ms Dube prepares reports for the development but fails to include objections raised by interested and affected parties. After receiving the reports, the competent authority grants the application for environmental authorisation. Green Horizon Developments (Pty) Ltd intends to construct a shopping centre, fuel station, parking areas, access roads and a waste disposal site near a wetland. Discuss whether these proposed activities are likely to require environmental authorisation and explain the purpose of conducting an environmental impact assessment before construction begins. After environmental authorisation was granted, community members remained dissatisfied with the decision. Explain the administrative and judicial remedies available to interested and affected parties who wish to challenge an environmental authorisation, including internal appeal, requests for reasons and judicial review. Green Horizon Developments (Pty) Ltd plans to build a large shopping centre and fuel station near a wetland area outside Polokwane in Limpopo Province. The proposed development will include parking areas, new access roads and a waste disposal site. The company appoints Ms Dube as the environmental assessment practitioner (EAP) to manage the application process. Local community members complain that the development may pollute the wetland and destroy natural habitats. Ms Dube prepares reports for the development but fails to include objections raised by interested and affected parties. After receiving the reports, the competent authority grants the application for environmental authorisation. The competent authority granted environmental authorisation after receiving the reports prepared by Ms Dube. Critically discuss the factors that the competent authority should consider before approving a development that may affect a wetland, including environmental, social, economic and cumulative impacts. Ms Dube failed to include objections raised by interested and affected parties. This is contrary to the principle of just administrative action. Examine the effect that the lack of public participation has on the application submitted to the competent authority. What steps can the local community members, as aggrieved parties, take to challenge the decision. Local community members are concerned that the development may pollute the wetland and destroy natural habitats. Discuss how the principles of sustainable development, pollution prevention and protection of biodiversity should guide the competent authority when deciding whether to grant environmental authorisation. Ms Dube was appointed as the environmental assessment practitioner responsible for preparing the environmental reports and managing the application process. Examine the legal duties of an environmental assessment practitioner and discuss the importance of independence, objectivity and full disclosure during an environmental authorisation application.

Content preview

LEG2601
Assignment 1 Semester 2 2026
Unique number:
Due date: 24 August 2026
2 DIFFERENT ANSWERS PROVIDED

The Legal Effect of Excluding Public Participation from an Environmental
Authorisation Process

1. Introduction

Green Horizon Developments proposes activities that may significantly affect a wetland,
including a shopping centre, fuel station, access roads, parking areas and a waste disposal
site. These activities may require environmental authorisation under section 24 of the
National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998, commonly referred to as NEMA. An
environmental assessment must identify the possible ecological, social and economic
effects before the competent authority makes its decision. NEMA also requires evidence of
adequate public participation as part of integrated environmental management (LEG2601,
Study Guide, page 59).

Ms Dube’s failure to include the objections of interested and affected parties means that the

, 2 DIFFERENT ANSWERS PROVIDED

The Legal Effect of Excluding Public Participation from an Environmental
Authorisation Process

1. Introduction

Green Horizon Developments proposes activities that may significantly affect a
wetland, including a shopping centre, fuel station, access roads, parking areas and a
waste disposal site. These activities may require environmental authorisation under
section 24 of the National Environmental Management Act 107 of 1998, commonly
referred to as NEMA. An environmental assessment must identify the possible
ecological, social and economic effects before the competent authority makes its
decision. NEMA also requires evidence of adequate public participation as part of
integrated environmental management (LEG2601, Study Guide, page 59).

Ms Dube’s failure to include the objections of interested and affected parties means
that the competent authority received an incomplete report. The environmental
authorisation is therefore open to challenge through an internal appeal and judicial
review.

2. Legal requirements for public participation

2.1 Environmental assessment legislation

Section 24 of NEMA requires environmental authorisation before identified activities
may begin. Section 23 requires the assessment process to consider actual and
potential environmental effects, risks, alternatives, mitigation measures and evidence
of adequate public participation (LEG2601, Study Guide, page 59).

The Environmental Impact Assessment Regulations 2014, published under NEMA in
GN R982, regulate the application and public participation process. Regulation 41
requires notice to interested and affected parties, including adjoining owners,
occupiers, the ward councillor, the municipality and relevant organs of state. The
public must receive relevant information and a reasonable opportunity to comment
on the application (LEG2601, Study Guide, page 72).

Connected book
 image
Sarel Johannes Smit Environmental Management
Publisher: 2015 ISBN: 9781485115472 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
July 25, 2026
File latest updated on
July 25, 2026
Number of pages
11
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$4.78

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
Gradify
4.3
(33)
Sold
176
Followers
0
Items
97
Last sold
2 days ago


Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions