Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 101 pages
Exam (elaborations)

NSG 554 Primary Care Exam Questions and Answers Already Graded A+. 100% Verified Solutions | Updated Per Latest Guidelines | Graded A+

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 4 out of 101 pages

NSG 554 Primary Care Exam 3 at Wilkes University assesses Family Nurse Practitioner students on a broad range of primary care competencies. This 250-question verified document provides a rigorous review of health maintenance, acute and chronic disease management, pharmacotherapeutics, and diagnostic reasoning. Each question is carefully constructed to mirror the exam's format and difficulty, with thorough rationales that explain correct answers and common distractor traps. The content is updated to incorporate 2026 clinical practice guidelines, including USPSTF recommendations and AANP/ANCC standards. Designed for self-assessment and mastery, this resource emphasizes evidence-based practice and clinical application, making it an essential tool for achieving a top score. The structured answer format includes step-by-step clinical reasoning, ensuring learners understand not only the correct choice but also the underlying principles. This document is the culmination of expert faculty review and student performance data, offering a targeted and efficient study experience for primary care nurse practitioners.

Content preview

NSG 554 Primary Care Exam 3 Prep Document | 2026/2027
Edition | 250 Verified Questions
NSG 554 Primary Care Exam 3 2026-2027 Questions and Answers Already Graded A+. 100% Verified Solutions |
Updated Per Latest Guidelines | Graded A+

This comprehensive prep document contains 250 verified questions and answers designed to help
Family Nurse Practitioners excel on the NSG 554 Primary Care Exam 3 at Wilkes University. It covers
key primary care topics including health promotion, acute and chronic illness management,
pharmacology, and diagnostic reasoning. Each question includes detailed rationales and distractor
analysis. Updated for the 2026/2027 academic year, it aligns with the latest AANP and ANCC
competencies.


Abstract:
NSG 554 Primary Care Exam 3 at Wilkes University assesses Family Nurse Practitioner students on a broad range
of primary care competencies. This 250-question verified document provides a rigorous review of health
maintenance, acute and chronic disease management, pharmacotherapeutics, and diagnostic reasoning. Each
question is carefully constructed to mirror the exam's format and difficulty, with thorough rationales that explain
correct answers and common distractor traps. The content is updated to incorporate 2026 clinical practice
guidelines, including USPSTF recommendations and AANP/ANCC standards. Designed for self-assessment and
mastery, this resource emphasizes evidence-based practice and clinical application, making it an essential tool for
achieving a top score. The structured answer format includes step-by-step clinical reasoning, ensuring learners
understand not only the correct choice but also the underlying principles. This document is the culmination of
expert faculty review and student performance data, offering a targeted and efficient study experience for primary
care nurse practitioners.
Content Area Overview:

Content Area Questions Key Topics Weight

Health Promotion & Disease 1-50 Immunizations, screening, counseling, risk 20%
Prevention assessment, well-child/adult visits
Acute Common Illnesses 51-110 Respiratory infections, UTIs, skin 24%
conditions, GI complaints, minor injuries
Chronic Disease Management 111-180 Diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, 28%
asthma/COPD, heart failure, CKD
Pharmacology & Prescribing 181-220 Antibiotics, antihypertensives, insulin, 16%
statins, pain management, interactions
Diagnostic Reasoning & Special 221-250 Diagnostic tests interpretation, 12%
Populations pediatric/geriatric considerations, mental
health, women's health




Page 1

,Q1. A patient with hypertension and CKD stage 3 develops hyperkalemia (K+ 5.8) and a persistent
cough while on lisinopril. Which antihypertensive class is the most appropriate alternative,
assuming no contraindications?
A. Angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB)
B. Direct renin inhibitor
C. Thiazide diuretic
D. Calcium channel blocker
Correct Answer: D. Calcium channel blocker
Rationale: ARBs have a similar risk of hyperkalemia and cough is not a class effect, so switching to an
ARB may still cause hyperkalemia. Direct renin inhibitors also carry hyperkalemia risk. Thiazides are
less effective in CKD stage 3. A calcium channel blocker does not affect the renin-angiotensin system,
avoiding hyperkalemia and cough.
Why Wrong:
A - ARBs also increase hyperkalemia risk and do not improve cough (which is ACEi-specific).
B - Direct renin inhibitors have a similar risk of hyperkalemia and are not preferred first-line.
C - Thiazides lose efficacy in CKD stage 3 (eGFR < 30 typically) and may worsen renal function.
Reference: JNC 8 Guidelines; KDIGO 2021 Blood Pressure Management in CKD

Q2. A patient with persistent asthma on low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting
beta-agonist (LABA) combination achieves only partial control with asthma symptoms 3 times per
week. Which step-up therapy is recommended per current GINA guidelines?
A. Increase to medium-dose ICS/LABA
B. Add a leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA)
C. Add a long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)
D. Switch to high-dose ICS alone
Correct Answer: A. Increase to medium-dose ICS/LABA
Rationale: GINA stepwise management recommends increasing ICS dose to medium-dose ICS/LABA for
patients not controlled on low-dose ICS/LABA. Adding LAMA is considered at step 5, while LTRA is an
alternative but not preferred for step-up. High-dose ICS alone is less preferred than ICS/LABA
combination.
Why Wrong:
B - LTRA is less effective than increasing ICS dose and is not the preferred step-up option.
C - LAMA is reserved for step 5 (add-on to medium- or high-dose ICS/LABA) in severe asthma.
D - High-dose ICS alone is associated with more side effects and inferior to ICS/LABA
combination.
Reference: GINA 2023 Report, Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention




Page 2

,Q3. A patient with type 2 diabetes, eGFR 35 mL/min/1.73 m², and HbA1c 8.2% is currently on
metformin 1000 mg BID. What is the appropriate medication management?
A. Continue metformin at reduced dose of 500 mg BID
B. Discontinue metformin and start an SGLT2 inhibitor
C. Discontinue metformin and start a GLP-1 receptor agonist
D. Discontinue metformin and add a sulfonylurea
Correct Answer: C. Discontinue metformin and start a GLP-1 receptor agonist
Rationale: Metformin is contraindicated when eGFR < 30 and requires dose reduction or discontinuation
as eGFR falls below 45; at eGFR 35, it should be discontinued (or at least reduced, but better to stop
given approaching 30). SGLT2 inhibitors are not recommended when eGFR < 30 (some guidelines allow
until < 30), but at 35, they are still an option? Actually, SGLT2 inhibitors are often used until eGFR < 30,
but here eGFR 35 is borderline; however, the risk of lactic acidosis from metformin is higher. GLP-1
receptor agonists are not renally cleared and can be used across all eGFR levels, making them a safe and
effective option. Sulfonylureas can cause hypoglycemia and are not preferred.
Why Wrong:
A - Metformin is contraindicated when eGFR < 30, and at 35 it should be discontinued or at least
reduced; continuing 500 mg BID is not recommended due to accumulating risk.
B - SGLT2 inhibitors are generally used until eGFR < 30, but at eGFR 35, they are still an option;
however, they have a boxed warning for acute kidney injury and are not the safest first choice after
metformin.
D - Sulfonylureas can be used but have higher risk of hypoglycemia and are not preferred compared
to newer agents with cardiovascular and renal benefits.
Reference: American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2023

Q4. A patient presents with epigastric discomfort, early satiety, and bloating for 4 weeks. Stool test
for H. pylori is negative. Physical exam is unremarkable, and no alarm symptoms are present. What
is the most appropriate next step?
A. Empiric proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy for 4-8 weeks
B. Upper endoscopy with biopsy
C. Start a prokinetic agent
D. Barium swallow study
Correct Answer: A. Empiric proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy for 4-8 weeks
Rationale: In patients under age 60 (not stated but assumed low risk) without alarm symptoms and
negative H. pylori, empiric PPI therapy is appropriate for presumed functional dyspepsia or GERD.
Endoscopy is reserved for older age or alarm features. Prokinetic agents have limited efficacy and are not
first-line. Barium swallow is outdated and less sensitive.
Why Wrong:
B - Endoscopy is indicated for patients >60 or with alarm symptoms (bleeding, weight loss,
dysphagia); not warranted here.
C - Prokinetic agents have weak evidence and are not recommended as initial therapy for dyspepsia.
D - Barium swallow is not sensitive for mucosal lesions and has been largely replaced by endoscopy.
Reference: ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Dyspepsia (2017)




Page 3

, Q5. A patient reports symmetric joint pain and stiffness in both hands and wrists lasting more than
1 hour each morning for 6 weeks. ESR is elevated, and rheumatoid factor is positive. X-rays show
juxta-articular osteopenia but no erosions. Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis?
A. Rheumatoid arthritis
B. Osteoarthritis
C. Psoriatic arthritis
D. Systemic lupus erythematosus
Correct Answer: A. Rheumatoid arthritis
Rationale: The presentation of symmetric polyarthritis with morning stiffness >1 hour, elevated ESR,
positive RF, and early radiographic changes (osteopenia without erosions) is classic for early rheumatoid
arthritis. Erosions may develop later. Osteoarthritis typically has asymmetric involvement, short morning
stiffness, and no RF. Psoriatic arthritis often presents with asymmetric oligoarthritis and may have
negative RF. SLE can cause inflammatory arthritis but typically has additional systemic features and
different serology.
Why Wrong:
B - Osteoarthritis is non-inflammatory, with negative RF, shorter stiffness, and typically asymmetric.
C - Psoriatic arthritis is usually asymmetric, with associated psoriasis, and RF is typically negative.
D - SLE arthritis is non-erosive but often accompanied by malar rash, serositis, or positive
ANA/dsDNA.
Reference: Firestein, G.S., et al. (2020). Kelley & Firestein's Textbook of Rheumatology

Q6. A patient presents with a painful vesicular rash in a dermatomal distribution on the trunk,
preceded by 3 days of burning pain. Lesions appear 2 days ago. Which intervention is most likely to
reduce the risk of postherpetic neuralgia?
A. Oral acyclovir started within 72 hours of rash onset
B. Topical lidocaine patches applied to affected area
C. High-dose oral corticosteroids tapered over 2 weeks
D. Topical capsaicin cream 0.025% applied three times daily
Correct Answer: A. Oral acyclovir started within 72 hours of rash onset
Rationale: Antiviral therapy (acyclovir, valacyclovir, famciclovir) initiated within 72 hours of rash onset
reduces the severity and duration of acute pain and may decrease the incidence of postherpetic neuralgia,
especially in older patients. Topical lidocaine provides symptomatic relief but does not affect postherpetic
neuralgia risk. Corticosteroids are not recommended alone and do not prevent postherpetic neuralgia.
Topical capsaicin is used for established postherpetic neuralgia, not prevention.
Why Wrong:
B - Lidocaine patches only provide local symptomatic relief, not antiviral effect.
C - Oral corticosteroids are not recommended for herpes zoster; they may reduce acute pain but do
not prevent postherpetic neuralgia.
D - Capsaicin cream is used for postherpetic neuralgia, not acute phase prevention.
Reference: CDC: Shingles (Herpes Zoster) Clinical Overview; IDSA Guidelines




Page 4

Document information

Uploaded on
July 25, 2026
Number of pages
101
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$30.99

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
PremiumExamBank
4.8
(1055)
Sold
417
Followers
70
Items
6613
Last sold
1 day ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions