APM PMQ Test 1 Questions with Correct
Answers
Strengths of Linear Life Cycle
· Predictability: Linear life cycles offer a high level of predictability since the project follows
a predefined sequence of phases.
· Clear Milestones: Well-defined phases and milestones make it easier to track progress and
manage the project timeline.
· Structured Planning: Detailed planning is done at the beginning, which can help in resource
allocation and budgeting.
Weakness of linear Life cycle
· Limited Flexibility: Changes are difficult to accommodate once the project is in progress,
making it less suitable for projects with evolving requirements.
· Late Stakeholder Involvement: Stakeholder feedback is often obtained only at the end of the
project, which may lead to misunderstandings or dissatisfaction.
Strengths of Iterative Life cycle
· Flexibility: Iterative models allow for changes and adaptations during the project, making
them suitable for projects with evolving or unclear requirements.
· Early Deliverables: Early and incremental delivery of functional components provides
stakeholders with tangible results and opportunities for early feedback.
· Risk Management: Iterative approaches allow for early identification and mitigation of risks
through continuous monitoring and adjustment.
Weakness of Iterative Life Cycles
, · Increased Complexity: The iterative nature may introduce complexities, and managing
multiple iterations requires careful coordination.
· Potentially Extended Timeline: Iterative cycles may extend the project timeline, particularly
if there are challenges in managing iterations efficiently.
Strengths of Hybrid Life Cycles
· Adaptability: Hybrid models offer a balance between the structure of linear approaches and
the flexibility of iterative approaches, allowing organisations to tailor the process to their
specific needs.
· Risk Mitigation: The combination of structured phases and adaptive elements can enhance
risk management.
· Early Stakeholder Engagement: Depending on the hybrid model, there may be opportunities
for early stakeholder involvement.
Weaknesses of Hybrid Life cycle
· Complexity: Combining different life cycle elements may introduce complexity, requiring
careful planning and execution.
· Resource Intensity: Managing the hybrid model may require more resources in terms of
planning, coordination, and communication.
Types of Governance Structure
*Matrix
*Functional
* Projectised
*Organisational
Functional Org Structure
Answers
Strengths of Linear Life Cycle
· Predictability: Linear life cycles offer a high level of predictability since the project follows
a predefined sequence of phases.
· Clear Milestones: Well-defined phases and milestones make it easier to track progress and
manage the project timeline.
· Structured Planning: Detailed planning is done at the beginning, which can help in resource
allocation and budgeting.
Weakness of linear Life cycle
· Limited Flexibility: Changes are difficult to accommodate once the project is in progress,
making it less suitable for projects with evolving requirements.
· Late Stakeholder Involvement: Stakeholder feedback is often obtained only at the end of the
project, which may lead to misunderstandings or dissatisfaction.
Strengths of Iterative Life cycle
· Flexibility: Iterative models allow for changes and adaptations during the project, making
them suitable for projects with evolving or unclear requirements.
· Early Deliverables: Early and incremental delivery of functional components provides
stakeholders with tangible results and opportunities for early feedback.
· Risk Management: Iterative approaches allow for early identification and mitigation of risks
through continuous monitoring and adjustment.
Weakness of Iterative Life Cycles
, · Increased Complexity: The iterative nature may introduce complexities, and managing
multiple iterations requires careful coordination.
· Potentially Extended Timeline: Iterative cycles may extend the project timeline, particularly
if there are challenges in managing iterations efficiently.
Strengths of Hybrid Life Cycles
· Adaptability: Hybrid models offer a balance between the structure of linear approaches and
the flexibility of iterative approaches, allowing organisations to tailor the process to their
specific needs.
· Risk Mitigation: The combination of structured phases and adaptive elements can enhance
risk management.
· Early Stakeholder Engagement: Depending on the hybrid model, there may be opportunities
for early stakeholder involvement.
Weaknesses of Hybrid Life cycle
· Complexity: Combining different life cycle elements may introduce complexity, requiring
careful planning and execution.
· Resource Intensity: Managing the hybrid model may require more resources in terms of
planning, coordination, and communication.
Types of Governance Structure
*Matrix
*Functional
* Projectised
*Organisational
Functional Org Structure
