Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 3 pages
Essay

To what extent is the ontological argument successful in proving the existence of God – Discuss 40 marks

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 1 out of 3 pages

This is an OCR A Level Religious Studies Philosophy of Religion essay on the question “To what extent is the ontological argument successful in proving the existence of God – Discuss.” Written by myself achieving an A grade in OCR A Level Religious Studies (2021), it explores Anselm’s two forms of the ontological argument and Descartes’ development of the argument, alongside key criticisms from Gaunilo, Aquinas and Kant. The essay evaluates whether the ontological argument successfully proves God's existence by examining concepts such as necessary existence, a priori reasoning, and whether existence can be considered a predicate. It weighs up both the strengths and weaknesses of the argument before reaching a balanced conclusion. This resource is ideal for revision, essay planning, and exam preparation, providing a clear model answer with balanced evaluation for OCR A Level Religious Studies Philosophy of Religion 40-mark questions on the ontological argument.

Content preview

To what extent is the ontological argument successful in
proving the existence of God – Discuss
40 marks
OCR A-level religious studies




Ontological arguments claim that we can prove God’s existence simply because it is in his nature to
exist; existence is a predicate of God, and therefore it is impossible for him not to exist. These are a
priori arguments, based on reason without the need for evidence; as God goes beyond our
understanding, empirical evidence is not needed to prove his existence. However, the ontological
argument is flawed as it is very hard to understand the nature of God and define his definition
without any empirical evidence of him.

Anslem put forward his ontological argument in his book ‘Proslogian’. His work was based on a belief
that faith precedes understanding, and so an understanding of God is a consequence of a belief in
him, not something that precedes him, as this would be a logical fallacy. He said ‘I believe so that I
may understand’. This explains how God can only be understood by those who fully believe in him.

Document information

Study Level
Subject
Uploaded on
July 5, 2026
Number of pages
3
Written in
2020/2021
Type
Essay
Professor(s)
Unknown
Grade
A
$4.87

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Sold
0
Followers
0
Items
20
Last sold
-




Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions