Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
PROBLEM 1.1
FIND: Explain the hierarchy of standards. Explain the term standard. Cite example.
SOLUTION
The term standard refers to an object or instrument, a method or a procedure that provides a
value of an acceptable accuracy for comparison.
A primary standard defines the value of the unit to which it is associated. Secondary
standards, while based on the primary standard, are more readily accessible and amenable
for use in a calibration. There is a hierarchy of secondary standards: A transfer standard
might be maintained by a national standards lab (such as NIST in the United States) to
calibrate industrial “laboratory standards”. It is costly and time-consuming to certify a
laboratory standard, so they are treated carefully and not used too regularly. A laboratory
standard would be maintained by a company to be used to certify a more common in-house
reference called the working standard. A working standard would be calibrated against the
laboratory standard. The working standard is used on a more regular basis to calibrate
everyday measurement devices or products being manufactured. Working standards are more
the norm for most of us. A working standard is simply the value or instrument that we
assume is correct in checking the output operation of another instrument.
Example: A government lab maintains the primary standard for pressure. It calibrates a an
instrument called a “deadweight tester” (see C9 discussion) for high pressure calibrations.
These form its transfer standard for high pressure. A company that makes pressure
transducers needs an in-house standard to certify their products. They purchase two
deadweight testers. They send one tester to the national lab to be calibrated; this becomes
their laboratory standard. On return, they use it to calibrate the other; this becomes their
working standard. They test their manufactured transducers using the working standard –
usually at one or two points over the transducer range to assure that it is working. Because
the working standard is being used regularly, it can go out of calibration. Periodically, they
check the working standard calibration against the laboratory standard.
See ASME PTC 19.2 Pressure Measurements for a further discussion.
A test standard defines a specific procedure that is to be followed.
Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
,Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
PROBLEM 1.2
FIND: Why calibrate? What does calibrated mean?
SOLUTION:
The purpose of a calibration is to evaluate and document the accuracy of a measuring device.
A calibration should be performed whenever the accuracy level of a measured value must be
ascertained.
An instrument that has been calibrated provides the engineer a basis for interpreting the
device’s output indication. It provides assurance in the measurement. Besides this purpose, a
calibration assures the engineer that the device is working as expected.
A periodic calibration of measuring instruments serves as a performance check on those
instruments and provides a level of confidence in their indicated values. A good rule is to
calibrate measuring systems annually or more often as needed.
ISO 9000 certifications have strict rules on calibration results and the frequency of
calibration.
Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
,Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
PROBLEM 1.3
FIND: Suggest methods to estimate the accuracy and random and systematic errors of a
dial thermometer.
SOLUTION:
Random error is related to repeatability: how closely an instrument indicates the same value.
So a method that repeatedly exposes the instrument to one or more known temperatures
could be developed to estimate the random error. This is usually stated as a statistical
estimate of the variation of the readings. An important aspect of such a test is to include
some mechanism to allow the instrument to change its indicated value following each
reading so that it must readjust itself.
For example, we could place the instrument in an environment of constant temperature and
note its indicated value and then move the instrument to another constant temperature
environment and note its value there. The two chosen temperatures could be representative of
the range of intended use of the instrument. By alternating between the two constant
temperature environments, differences in indicated values within each environment would be
indicative of the precision error to be expected of the instrument at that temperature. Of
course, this assumes that the constant temperatures do indeed remain constant throughout the
test and the instrument is used in an identical manner for each measurement.
Systematic error is a fixed offset. In the absence of random error, this would be how closely
the instrument indicates the correct value. This offset would be present in every reading. So
an important aspect of this check is to calibrate it against a value that is at least as accurate as
you need. This is not trivial.
For example, you could use the ice point (0oC) as a check for systematic error. The ice point
is formed from a carefully prepared bath of solid ice and liquid water. As another check, the
melting point of a pure substance, such as silver, could be used. Or easier, the steam point.
Accuracy requires a calibration to assess both random and systematic errors. If in the
preceding test the temperatures of the two constant temperature environments were known,
the above procedure could serve to establish the systematic error, as well as random error of
the instrument. To do this: The difference between the average of the readings obtained at
some known temperature and the known temperature would provide an estimate of the
systematic error.
Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
, Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
PROBLEM 1.4
FIND: Discuss interference in the test of Figure 1.3
SOLUTION :
In the example described by Figure 1.3, tests were run on different days on which the local
barometric pressure had changed. Between any two days of different barometric pressure, the
boiling point measured would be different – this offset is due to the interference effect of the
pressure.
Consider a test run over several days coincident with the motion of a major weather front
through the area. Clearly, this would impose a trend on the dataset. For example, the
measured boiling point may be seem as increasing from day to day.
By running over random days separated by a sufficient period of days, so as not to allow any
one atmospheric front to impose a trend on the data, the effects of atmospheric pressure can
be broken up into noise. The measured boiling point might then be high one test but then low
on the next, in effect, making it look like random data scatter, i.e. noise.
Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
PROBLEM 1.1
FIND: Explain the hierarchy of standards. Explain the term standard. Cite example.
SOLUTION
The term standard refers to an object or instrument, a method or a procedure that provides a
value of an acceptable accuracy for comparison.
A primary standard defines the value of the unit to which it is associated. Secondary
standards, while based on the primary standard, are more readily accessible and amenable
for use in a calibration. There is a hierarchy of secondary standards: A transfer standard
might be maintained by a national standards lab (such as NIST in the United States) to
calibrate industrial “laboratory standards”. It is costly and time-consuming to certify a
laboratory standard, so they are treated carefully and not used too regularly. A laboratory
standard would be maintained by a company to be used to certify a more common in-house
reference called the working standard. A working standard would be calibrated against the
laboratory standard. The working standard is used on a more regular basis to calibrate
everyday measurement devices or products being manufactured. Working standards are more
the norm for most of us. A working standard is simply the value or instrument that we
assume is correct in checking the output operation of another instrument.
Example: A government lab maintains the primary standard for pressure. It calibrates a an
instrument called a “deadweight tester” (see C9 discussion) for high pressure calibrations.
These form its transfer standard for high pressure. A company that makes pressure
transducers needs an in-house standard to certify their products. They purchase two
deadweight testers. They send one tester to the national lab to be calibrated; this becomes
their laboratory standard. On return, they use it to calibrate the other; this becomes their
working standard. They test their manufactured transducers using the working standard –
usually at one or two points over the transducer range to assure that it is working. Because
the working standard is being used regularly, it can go out of calibration. Periodically, they
check the working standard calibration against the laboratory standard.
See ASME PTC 19.2 Pressure Measurements for a further discussion.
A test standard defines a specific procedure that is to be followed.
Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
,Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
PROBLEM 1.2
FIND: Why calibrate? What does calibrated mean?
SOLUTION:
The purpose of a calibration is to evaluate and document the accuracy of a measuring device.
A calibration should be performed whenever the accuracy level of a measured value must be
ascertained.
An instrument that has been calibrated provides the engineer a basis for interpreting the
device’s output indication. It provides assurance in the measurement. Besides this purpose, a
calibration assures the engineer that the device is working as expected.
A periodic calibration of measuring instruments serves as a performance check on those
instruments and provides a level of confidence in their indicated values. A good rule is to
calibrate measuring systems annually or more often as needed.
ISO 9000 certifications have strict rules on calibration results and the frequency of
calibration.
Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
,Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
PROBLEM 1.3
FIND: Suggest methods to estimate the accuracy and random and systematic errors of a
dial thermometer.
SOLUTION:
Random error is related to repeatability: how closely an instrument indicates the same value.
So a method that repeatedly exposes the instrument to one or more known temperatures
could be developed to estimate the random error. This is usually stated as a statistical
estimate of the variation of the readings. An important aspect of such a test is to include
some mechanism to allow the instrument to change its indicated value following each
reading so that it must readjust itself.
For example, we could place the instrument in an environment of constant temperature and
note its indicated value and then move the instrument to another constant temperature
environment and note its value there. The two chosen temperatures could be representative of
the range of intended use of the instrument. By alternating between the two constant
temperature environments, differences in indicated values within each environment would be
indicative of the precision error to be expected of the instrument at that temperature. Of
course, this assumes that the constant temperatures do indeed remain constant throughout the
test and the instrument is used in an identical manner for each measurement.
Systematic error is a fixed offset. In the absence of random error, this would be how closely
the instrument indicates the correct value. This offset would be present in every reading. So
an important aspect of this check is to calibrate it against a value that is at least as accurate as
you need. This is not trivial.
For example, you could use the ice point (0oC) as a check for systematic error. The ice point
is formed from a carefully prepared bath of solid ice and liquid water. As another check, the
melting point of a pure substance, such as silver, could be used. Or easier, the steam point.
Accuracy requires a calibration to assess both random and systematic errors. If in the
preceding test the temperatures of the two constant temperature environments were known,
the above procedure could serve to establish the systematic error, as well as random error of
the instrument. To do this: The difference between the average of the readings obtained at
some known temperature and the known temperature would provide an estimate of the
systematic error.
Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
, Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
PROBLEM 1.4
FIND: Discuss interference in the test of Figure 1.3
SOLUTION :
In the example described by Figure 1.3, tests were run on different days on which the local
barometric pressure had changed. Between any two days of different barometric pressure, the
boiling point measured would be different – this offset is due to the interference effect of the
pressure.
Consider a test run over several days coincident with the motion of a major weather front
through the area. Clearly, this would impose a trend on the dataset. For example, the
measured boiling point may be seem as increasing from day to day.
By running over random days separated by a sufficient period of days, so as not to allow any
one atmospheric front to impose a trend on the data, the effects of atmospheric pressure can
be broken up into noise. The measured boiling point might then be high one test but then low
on the next, in effect, making it look like random data scatter, i.e. noise.
Solution manual for theory and design
Solution
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
bySolution
richards.pdf
for mechanical
manual formeasurements
theory and design
by richards.pdf
for mechanical measurements by richards.pdf
