MRL3701 ASSIGNMENT 2 SOLUTIONS 2021
Question 1
(i) The relevant case law for this question would be Stratford v Investec Bank Ltd 2015
(3) SA 1 (CC).
The facts of the scenario are similar to that of the Stratford case. In this case the
candidate attorney who represented the Investec bank furnished a copy of the notice
of motion and the founding affidavit to the Stratfords. She also asked if they had a
domestic employee to which the Stratfords replied yes and she left a copy of the
petition on the kitchen table. This was so that the Stratfords could deliver it to their
employee. They did not inform the candidate attorney that they had two other
domestic employees.
Question 1
(i) The relevant case law for this question would be Stratford v Investec Bank Ltd 2015
(3) SA 1 (CC).
The facts of the scenario are similar to that of the Stratford case. In this case the
candidate attorney who represented the Investec bank furnished a copy of the notice
of motion and the founding affidavit to the Stratfords. She also asked if they had a
domestic employee to which the Stratfords replied yes and she left a copy of the
petition on the kitchen table. This was so that the Stratfords could deliver it to their
employee. They did not inform the candidate attorney that they had two other
domestic employees.
