LCR4805 Assignment 2 2026 - Distinction | Due September 2026

LCR4805 Assignment 2 Semester 2 2026 - Due September 2026 ASSESSMENT 2 Student Number: 243981 QUESTION 1 1(a) We live in an “information age,” and the question that often arises is whether information can be stolen. Refer to the common law definition of “theft” and critically discuss whether the law in South Africa has adapted to keep up with technological advancements. Discuss comparatively by referring to the positions in other jurisdictions and include case law, legislation, and academic commentary where applicable. Please note: The question is NOT whether it is physically possible to steal information, but whether the legal principles make provision for it. (20) 1(b) Martha buys property and engages the services of a law firm, ZYD Attorneys. Hackers ABC intercept an email and manipulate the details in their favour. Consequently, Martha transfers R5 million into the account of the hackers (ABC) rather than that of the law firm. What charges can ABC face? Discuss the legal position both before and after the Cybercrimes Act 19 of 2020 came into force. Substantiate your answer by referring to relevant legislation and case law. (15) ASSESSMENT CRITERIA  This question will be evaluated primarily on the overall content of the answer, the substantiated conclusions and the referencing style used.  Length restriction: Your answer to Question 1 may not exceed 8 typed pages. More but related content can be acceptable.  To find sources from the library’s databases, you can make use of the LibGuides link: UNISA Law LibGuides QUESTION 2 Discuss in detail whether communications on social media can be admissible evidence in court. (15) ASSESSMENT CRITERIA  This question will be evaluated primarily on the overall content of the answer, the substantiated conclusions and the referencing style used.  Length restriction: Your answer to Question 2 may not exceed 3 typed pages. More but related content can be acceptable.  To find sources from the library’s databases, you can make use of the LibGuides link: UNISA Law LibGuides QUESTION 3 Mr. Ndlovu is a South African citizen who is based temporarily in Belgium. Mr Ndlovu intends to buy an apartment based in Durban from Mr Adams for investment purposes. Instead of the traditional pen and paper agreement, Mr Ndlovu, after receiving the property sale agreement electronically, reviews it and signs it using his smartphone. With reference to the case of Spring Forest Trading v Wilberry (725/130 (2014) ZASCA 178 (21 November 2014)) discuss the legal issues surrounding electronic signatures. In y