Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4.6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 11 pages
Summary

Samenvatting IEBP op basis van leerdoelen

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 11 pages

Dit is een samenvatting voor het vak IEBP, samengesteld op basis van de leerdoelen. Met deze samenvatting ik een 7,7 behaald.

Content preview

Samenvatting Introductie in EBP
1. In de rol van Professional benoemt de student de verschillende stappen van Evidence
Based Practice.

2. In de rol van Professional categoriseert de student onderzoek naar het type onderzoek en
het ‘level of evidence’.

3. In de rol van Innovator vult de student een format zoekstrategie bij een gegeven
onderzoeksvraag.

4. In de rol van Innovator vult de student de zoekstrategie toe in databases voor
wetenschappelijke literatuur van het mediacentrum van Windesheim.

5. In de rol van Innovator beschrijft de student de kenmerken van onderzoek naar
diagnostische meetinstrumenten.

6. In de rol van Innovator beschrijft de student de kenmerken van onderzoek naar therapie-
effect.

7. In de rol van Innovator geeft de student sterkten en zwakten aan van onderzoek dat
beschreven is in enkele gegeven wetenschappelijke artikelen




1

, Inhoudsopgave
Samenvatting Introductie in EBP.................................................................................................................... 1

1. In de rol van Professional benoemt de student de verschillende stappen van Evidence Based Practice........3
1.1. Evidence Based Practice................................................................................................................................3
1.2. Stappen EBP...................................................................................................................................................3

2. In de rol van Professional categoriseert de student onderzoek naar het type onderzoek en het ‘level of
evidence’....................................................................................................................................................... 3
2.1. Soorten artikelen...........................................................................................................................................3
2.1.1. Originele artikelen.................................................................................................................................3
2.1.2. Reviews..................................................................................................................................................3
2.2. Bepalen relevantie.........................................................................................................................................4
2.3. Beoordelen evidentie.....................................................................................................................................4
2.3.1. Betrouwbaarheid...................................................................................................................................4
2.3.2. Validiteit.................................................................................................................................................4
2.4. Level of evidence van onderzoeken...............................................................................................................5
2.5. PICO...............................................................................................................................................................5
2.6. Piramide evidentie.........................................................................................................................................5
2.7. Soorten onderzoek.........................................................................................................................................5
2.7.1. Kwalitatief..............................................................................................................................................5
2.7.2. Kwantitatief...........................................................................................................................................5
2.7.3. Dwarsdoorsnede onderzoek..................................................................................................................6
2.7.4. Longitudinaal onderzoek.......................................................................................................................6
2.8. Onderzoeksdesigns........................................................................................................................................6
2.8.1. Experimenteel........................................................................................................................................6
2.8.2. Observationeel.......................................................................................................................................6
2.9. Randomisatie.................................................................................................................................................7

3. In de rol van Innovator vult de student een format zoekstrategie bij een gegeven onderzoeksvraag...........8
3.1. Zoekstrategie.................................................................................................................................................8
3.1.1. Sneeuwbalmethode...............................................................................................................................8

4. In de rol van Innovator vult de student de zoekstrategie toe in databases voor wetenschappelijke
literatuur van het mediacentrum van Windesheim.........................................................................................8
4.1. Databanken...................................................................................................................................................8
4.1.1. Gratis......................................................................................................................................................8
4.1.2. Abonnement..........................................................................................................................................8

5. In de rol van Innovator beschrijft de student de kenmerken van onderzoek naar diagnostische
meetinstrumenten......................................................................................................................................... 9
5.1. Prevalentie.....................................................................................................................................................9
5.2. Soorten bias...................................................................................................................................................9
5.2.1. Selectie bias...........................................................................................................................................9
5.2.2. Observer-bias.........................................................................................................................................9
5.2.3. Recall-bias............................................................................................................................................10
5.2.4. Response-bias......................................................................................................................................10

2

Connected book
 image
Hanneke Kalf, Joost De Beer Evidence-based logopedie
Publisher: april 2011 ISBN: 9789031376001 Edition: 2

Document information

Study
Summarized whole book?
No
Which chapters are summarized?
Hoofdstukken benoemd in de studiewijzer
Uploaded on
May 27, 2021
Number of pages
11
Written in
2019/2020
Type
Summary
$7.75

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
demisophia
4.1
(13)
Sold
100
Followers
49
Items
16
Last sold
10 months ago



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions