The Differences Between an Annotated Bibliography
and a Discursive Prose Literature Review
Writing comes in several forms as authors seek out a variety of ways to present their
information. Notably, the most common forms that appear in research and study paper are
examples of literature reviews which are the annotated bibliography and the standard literature
review. While the annotated bibliography appears as an outline with a rigid structure, a literature
review stands as an example of discursive prose which delves deeper into the study topic or
argument. Though the two document formats are classified under literature reviews, their vary in
regard to their structure and overall goal when presenting the subject matter under investigation.
The annotated bibliography structure is vastly different from that of a standard literature
review. Notably, the latter option often has a reference page at the very end of the document as a
presentation of all the information sourced for the study. However, an annotated bibliography
follows a strict structure where the reference comes at the beginning of each source. In most
cases, the references are divided into sections and paragraphs with each section deal with
individual arguments or subjects that is for or against the overall idea being presented (Buttram
& MacMillan, 2012). The separation of specific sources is a distinct feature that makes this
method of writing stand out when compared to its counterpart. Additionally, this structure does
not follow a prose format which introduces, builds then concludes on a concept but rather briefly
seeks out relevance, credibility and summary of the main ideology pursued throughout the article
, in focus. Therefore, the structure between the two documents is a distinct feature that allows for
easy identification.
The two-literature reviews differ slightly on the purpose and components enshrined in
their presentation. Particularly, the standard literature option offers a more discursive prose
format than its annotated counterpart. Essentially, the arguments posed in both documents may
be the same but their presentation varies based on the purpose and content highlighted. For
example, the standard form applies an introduction which explains the subject matter while later
subsequently synthesizing the available sources throughout the body portion of the paper. All
the information and ideas presented are later summarized in a conclusion section which ties the
argument together. In contrast, the annotated bibliography summarizes each source
independently to highlight its credibility and relevance on the subject matter (Buttram &
MacMillan, 2012). Therefore, the prose format followed throughout the ordinary literature
review helps synthesize the sources to enhance the idea being presented rather than simply state
its relevance to the claim being made.
A literature review is a personal analysis of the studies and research towards the
establishment of an argument. Essentially, a literature review is primarily an argumentative
piece where one seeks the development of skills, understanding and critical analysis of facts.
Additionally, one also seeks to identify the gaps in the study which then justify the research
fueling the potential research about to be implemented (O’Leary, 2017). A regular review helps
establish a formal understanding of the knowledge present in the study which creates a personal
interpretation of the ideas being brought forward. Particularly, the information presented in this
form of writing seeks to argue for why your study is needed as most of the sources already touch
on the subject matter in focus. This ideology also helps show the research credibility to be
and a Discursive Prose Literature Review
Writing comes in several forms as authors seek out a variety of ways to present their
information. Notably, the most common forms that appear in research and study paper are
examples of literature reviews which are the annotated bibliography and the standard literature
review. While the annotated bibliography appears as an outline with a rigid structure, a literature
review stands as an example of discursive prose which delves deeper into the study topic or
argument. Though the two document formats are classified under literature reviews, their vary in
regard to their structure and overall goal when presenting the subject matter under investigation.
The annotated bibliography structure is vastly different from that of a standard literature
review. Notably, the latter option often has a reference page at the very end of the document as a
presentation of all the information sourced for the study. However, an annotated bibliography
follows a strict structure where the reference comes at the beginning of each source. In most
cases, the references are divided into sections and paragraphs with each section deal with
individual arguments or subjects that is for or against the overall idea being presented (Buttram
& MacMillan, 2012). The separation of specific sources is a distinct feature that makes this
method of writing stand out when compared to its counterpart. Additionally, this structure does
not follow a prose format which introduces, builds then concludes on a concept but rather briefly
seeks out relevance, credibility and summary of the main ideology pursued throughout the article
, in focus. Therefore, the structure between the two documents is a distinct feature that allows for
easy identification.
The two-literature reviews differ slightly on the purpose and components enshrined in
their presentation. Particularly, the standard literature option offers a more discursive prose
format than its annotated counterpart. Essentially, the arguments posed in both documents may
be the same but their presentation varies based on the purpose and content highlighted. For
example, the standard form applies an introduction which explains the subject matter while later
subsequently synthesizing the available sources throughout the body portion of the paper. All
the information and ideas presented are later summarized in a conclusion section which ties the
argument together. In contrast, the annotated bibliography summarizes each source
independently to highlight its credibility and relevance on the subject matter (Buttram &
MacMillan, 2012). Therefore, the prose format followed throughout the ordinary literature
review helps synthesize the sources to enhance the idea being presented rather than simply state
its relevance to the claim being made.
A literature review is a personal analysis of the studies and research towards the
establishment of an argument. Essentially, a literature review is primarily an argumentative
piece where one seeks the development of skills, understanding and critical analysis of facts.
Additionally, one also seeks to identify the gaps in the study which then justify the research
fueling the potential research about to be implemented (O’Leary, 2017). A regular review helps
establish a formal understanding of the knowledge present in the study which creates a personal
interpretation of the ideas being brought forward. Particularly, the information presented in this
form of writing seeks to argue for why your study is needed as most of the sources already touch
on the subject matter in focus. This ideology also helps show the research credibility to be
