ALNCCB-LNCC Exam Questions with Correct
Answers Updated 2026
A Aplaintiff Aclaims Aa Afailure-to-warn Adefect Ain Aa Achemotherapy
Adrug Athat
Acaused Asevere Aneutropenia, Aalleging Athe Alabel Adid Anot
Aadequately Awarn
Aof Athe Arisk Ain Apatients Awith Alow Abaseline Aneutrophil Acounts.
AAs Aa Alegal Anurse Aconsultant, Awhich Adocument Awould Ayou
Aprioritize Ato Aassess Athe Awarning’s Aadequacy?
A. The Apatient’s Acomplete Ablood Acount A(CBC) Aresults
B. The Adrug’s AFDA-approved Apackage Ainsert Adetailing Awarnings
Aand Aprecautions
C. The Amanufacturer’s Aclinical Atrial Adata
D. A Arecall Anotice Afor Aa Adifferent Achemotherapy Adrug
AAnswer: AB
Explanation: AThe AFDA-approved Apackage Ainsert Acontains Athe
Aofficial
Awarnings Aand Aprecautions Afor Aa Adrug, Amaking Ait Athe Aprimary
Adocument Ato Aassess Awhether Athe Alabel Aadequately Awarned Aof
Aneutropenia Arisks Ain Apatients Awith Alow Aneutrophil Acounts. ACBC
Aresults
Aare Arelevant Ato Ainjury Abut Anot Awarning Aadequacy, Aclinical Atrial
Adata Ais Asecondary Ato Athe Aapproved Alabel, Aand Aa Arecall Afor
Aa Adifferent Adrug Ais Airrelevant.
A A32-year-old Aplaintiff Aseeks Acompensatory Adamages Aafter Aa
Aconstruction
Asite Aaccident Acaused Aa Aspinal Ainjury. AMedical Aexpenses Aare
A$100,000,
Aand Alost Awages Aare A$50,000. AThe Adefense Aargues Acontributory
Anegligence, Aalleging Athe Aplaintiff Aignored Asafety Abarriers. AThe
ALNC Areviews Aphotos Ashowing Afaded Abarrier Asigns. AHow Ashould
Athe ALNC Areport Adamages?
A. Report Aonly Amedical Aexpenses A($100,000) Adue Ato Abarrier-
related Anegligence
,B. Reduce Adamages Aby A40% A($90,000) Afor Aignoring Abarriers
C. Include Amedical Aexpenses, Alost Awages, Aand Afuture Acare
A($200,000)
D. Sum Amedical Aexpenses Aand Alost Awages A($150,000), Anoting
Afaded Asigns
AAnswer: AD
Explanation: ACompensatory Adamages Ainclude Averified Alosses Alike
Amedical Aexpenses A($100,000) Aand Alost Awages A($50,000),
Atotaling A$150,000.
ANoting Athe Afaded Abarrier Asigns Acounters Acontributory Anegligence,
Aas Ait
Asuggests Athe Aplaintiff Awas Anot Aadequately Awarned. AIncluding
Aunverified Acosts Aor Areducing Adamages Aarbitrarily Alacks Aevidence,
Aand Aexcluding Alost Awages Aignores Averified Alosses.
A Aconservator Afor Aa A71-year-old Apatient Awith Amultiple Asclerosis
A(MS)
Aoversees Aa A$3 Amillion Atrust. AThe Aconservator Ainvests A$1
Amillion Ain Aa
Astartup Awith Ano Aproven Arevenue, Aciting A“growth Apotential.” AThe
Apatient’s Arecent AEDSS Ascore Ais A6.5, Aindicating Amobility
Alimitations. AAs Aa Alegal Anurse Aconsultant, Awhich Aaction Amost
Astrongly Aindicates Aa Abreach Aof Afiduciary Aduty?
A. The AEDSS Ascore Ashows Asignificant AMS Aprogression
B. The Atrust’s Avalue Ahas Anot Ayet Adeclined
C. The Apatient’s AMS Atreatment Aincludes Anatalizumab
D. The Ainvestment Alacks Adiversification Aor Arisk Aassessment
AAnswer: AD
Explanation: AFiduciary Aduty Arequires Aprudent, Adiversified
Ainvestments. AA
A$1 Amillion Ainvestment Ain Aan Aunproven Astartup Awithout Arisk
Aassessment Ais Areckless Aand Alikely Aviolates Athis Aduty. AMS
Aprogression, Atreatment, Aor Astable Atrust Avalue Adoes Anot Aaddress
Athe Ainvestment’s Aimprudence.
, A Alegal Anurse Aconsultant Ais Apreparing Aexpert Atestimony Ain Aa
Acase
Awhere Aa Apatient Adeveloped Aanaphylaxis Aafter Areceiving
Apenicillin Adespite
Aa Adocumented Aallergy. AThe Achart Ashows Athe Aallergy Aalert Awas
Aoverridden Ain Athe Aelectronic Amedication Aadministration Asystem.
AThe
Aplaintiff Aalleges Anegligence. ADuring Acrossexamination, Athe Adefense
Aattorney Achallenges Athe Aconsultant’s Areliance Aon Athe Aoverride
Alog Aas Ahearsay. AHow Ashould Athe Aconsultant Arespond?
A. Request Athe Apharmacist Ato Atestify Aabout Athe Aoverride
B. Base Athe Atestimony Aon Athe Apatient’s Aclinical Asymptoms
Aalone
C. Argue Athat Athe Aoverride Alog Ais Aa Abusiness Arecord
Aexception Ato AhearsayD. AWithdraw Areliance Aon Athe Aoverride
Alog
AAnswer: AC
Explanation: AThe Aoverride Alog, Aas Apart Aof Athe Aelectronic
Amedication
Asystem, Aqualifies Aas Aa Abusiness Arecord Aexception Ato Ahearsay
Aunder AFederal ARule Aof AEvidence A803(6), Aas Ait Ais Aroutinely
Agenerated Aduring
Amedication Aadministration. AThe Aconsultant Ashould Adefend Areliance
Aon Athe
Alog. ABasing Atestimony Aon Asymptoms Aalone Aomits Anegligence
Adetails,
Arequesting Apharmacist Atestimony Ais Aunnecessary, Aand
Awithdrawing Areliance Aweakens Athe Acase. AQuestion: A703 A
A A40-year-old Amale Aplaintiff Awith Aa Alower Alimb Aamputation
Afrom Aa
Atrain Aaccident Arequires Aa Alife Acare Aplan. AMedical Arecords Ashow
Aa
Aprosthetic Aleg A($30,000 Aevery A5 Ayears), Aphysical Atherapy
A($100/session, A3 Asessions/week), Aand Apain Amanagement
A($200/month). ACalculate Athe Afuture Acost Aover Aa A40-year Alife
Aexpectancy Awith Aa A2% Ainflation Arate.
A. $2,456,000
Answers Updated 2026
A Aplaintiff Aclaims Aa Afailure-to-warn Adefect Ain Aa Achemotherapy
Adrug Athat
Acaused Asevere Aneutropenia, Aalleging Athe Alabel Adid Anot
Aadequately Awarn
Aof Athe Arisk Ain Apatients Awith Alow Abaseline Aneutrophil Acounts.
AAs Aa Alegal Anurse Aconsultant, Awhich Adocument Awould Ayou
Aprioritize Ato Aassess Athe Awarning’s Aadequacy?
A. The Apatient’s Acomplete Ablood Acount A(CBC) Aresults
B. The Adrug’s AFDA-approved Apackage Ainsert Adetailing Awarnings
Aand Aprecautions
C. The Amanufacturer’s Aclinical Atrial Adata
D. A Arecall Anotice Afor Aa Adifferent Achemotherapy Adrug
AAnswer: AB
Explanation: AThe AFDA-approved Apackage Ainsert Acontains Athe
Aofficial
Awarnings Aand Aprecautions Afor Aa Adrug, Amaking Ait Athe Aprimary
Adocument Ato Aassess Awhether Athe Alabel Aadequately Awarned Aof
Aneutropenia Arisks Ain Apatients Awith Alow Aneutrophil Acounts. ACBC
Aresults
Aare Arelevant Ato Ainjury Abut Anot Awarning Aadequacy, Aclinical Atrial
Adata Ais Asecondary Ato Athe Aapproved Alabel, Aand Aa Arecall Afor
Aa Adifferent Adrug Ais Airrelevant.
A A32-year-old Aplaintiff Aseeks Acompensatory Adamages Aafter Aa
Aconstruction
Asite Aaccident Acaused Aa Aspinal Ainjury. AMedical Aexpenses Aare
A$100,000,
Aand Alost Awages Aare A$50,000. AThe Adefense Aargues Acontributory
Anegligence, Aalleging Athe Aplaintiff Aignored Asafety Abarriers. AThe
ALNC Areviews Aphotos Ashowing Afaded Abarrier Asigns. AHow Ashould
Athe ALNC Areport Adamages?
A. Report Aonly Amedical Aexpenses A($100,000) Adue Ato Abarrier-
related Anegligence
,B. Reduce Adamages Aby A40% A($90,000) Afor Aignoring Abarriers
C. Include Amedical Aexpenses, Alost Awages, Aand Afuture Acare
A($200,000)
D. Sum Amedical Aexpenses Aand Alost Awages A($150,000), Anoting
Afaded Asigns
AAnswer: AD
Explanation: ACompensatory Adamages Ainclude Averified Alosses Alike
Amedical Aexpenses A($100,000) Aand Alost Awages A($50,000),
Atotaling A$150,000.
ANoting Athe Afaded Abarrier Asigns Acounters Acontributory Anegligence,
Aas Ait
Asuggests Athe Aplaintiff Awas Anot Aadequately Awarned. AIncluding
Aunverified Acosts Aor Areducing Adamages Aarbitrarily Alacks Aevidence,
Aand Aexcluding Alost Awages Aignores Averified Alosses.
A Aconservator Afor Aa A71-year-old Apatient Awith Amultiple Asclerosis
A(MS)
Aoversees Aa A$3 Amillion Atrust. AThe Aconservator Ainvests A$1
Amillion Ain Aa
Astartup Awith Ano Aproven Arevenue, Aciting A“growth Apotential.” AThe
Apatient’s Arecent AEDSS Ascore Ais A6.5, Aindicating Amobility
Alimitations. AAs Aa Alegal Anurse Aconsultant, Awhich Aaction Amost
Astrongly Aindicates Aa Abreach Aof Afiduciary Aduty?
A. The AEDSS Ascore Ashows Asignificant AMS Aprogression
B. The Atrust’s Avalue Ahas Anot Ayet Adeclined
C. The Apatient’s AMS Atreatment Aincludes Anatalizumab
D. The Ainvestment Alacks Adiversification Aor Arisk Aassessment
AAnswer: AD
Explanation: AFiduciary Aduty Arequires Aprudent, Adiversified
Ainvestments. AA
A$1 Amillion Ainvestment Ain Aan Aunproven Astartup Awithout Arisk
Aassessment Ais Areckless Aand Alikely Aviolates Athis Aduty. AMS
Aprogression, Atreatment, Aor Astable Atrust Avalue Adoes Anot Aaddress
Athe Ainvestment’s Aimprudence.
, A Alegal Anurse Aconsultant Ais Apreparing Aexpert Atestimony Ain Aa
Acase
Awhere Aa Apatient Adeveloped Aanaphylaxis Aafter Areceiving
Apenicillin Adespite
Aa Adocumented Aallergy. AThe Achart Ashows Athe Aallergy Aalert Awas
Aoverridden Ain Athe Aelectronic Amedication Aadministration Asystem.
AThe
Aplaintiff Aalleges Anegligence. ADuring Acrossexamination, Athe Adefense
Aattorney Achallenges Athe Aconsultant’s Areliance Aon Athe Aoverride
Alog Aas Ahearsay. AHow Ashould Athe Aconsultant Arespond?
A. Request Athe Apharmacist Ato Atestify Aabout Athe Aoverride
B. Base Athe Atestimony Aon Athe Apatient’s Aclinical Asymptoms
Aalone
C. Argue Athat Athe Aoverride Alog Ais Aa Abusiness Arecord
Aexception Ato AhearsayD. AWithdraw Areliance Aon Athe Aoverride
Alog
AAnswer: AC
Explanation: AThe Aoverride Alog, Aas Apart Aof Athe Aelectronic
Amedication
Asystem, Aqualifies Aas Aa Abusiness Arecord Aexception Ato Ahearsay
Aunder AFederal ARule Aof AEvidence A803(6), Aas Ait Ais Aroutinely
Agenerated Aduring
Amedication Aadministration. AThe Aconsultant Ashould Adefend Areliance
Aon Athe
Alog. ABasing Atestimony Aon Asymptoms Aalone Aomits Anegligence
Adetails,
Arequesting Apharmacist Atestimony Ais Aunnecessary, Aand
Awithdrawing Areliance Aweakens Athe Acase. AQuestion: A703 A
A A40-year-old Amale Aplaintiff Awith Aa Alower Alimb Aamputation
Afrom Aa
Atrain Aaccident Arequires Aa Alife Acare Aplan. AMedical Arecords Ashow
Aa
Aprosthetic Aleg A($30,000 Aevery A5 Ayears), Aphysical Atherapy
A($100/session, A3 Asessions/week), Aand Apain Amanagement
A($200/month). ACalculate Athe Afuture Acost Aover Aa A40-year Alife
Aexpectancy Awith Aa A2% Ainflation Arate.
A. $2,456,000
