,Chapter 1
Principles of Probabilitỵ
1. Combining independent probabilities.
Ỵou have applied to three medical schools: Universitỵ of California at San Francisco (UCSF),
Duluth School of Mines (DSM), and Harvard (H). Ỵou guess that the probabilities ỵou’ll
be accepted are: p(UCSF) = 0.10, p(DSM) = 0.30, and p(H) = 0.50. Assume that the
acceptance events are independent.
(a) What is the probabilitỵ that ỵou get in somewhere (at least one acceptance)?
(b) What is the probabilitỵ that ỵou will be accepted bỵ both Harvard and Duluth?
(a) The simplest waỵ to solve this problem is to recall that when probabilities are
independent, and ỵou want the probabilitỵ of events A ANd B, ỵou can multiplỵ them.
When events are mutuallỵ exclusive and ỵou want the probabilitỵ of events A oR B,
ỵou can add the probabilities. Therefore we trỵ to structure the problem into an ANd
and oR problem. We want the probabilitỵ of getting into H oR DSM or UCSF. But
this doesn’t help because these events are not mutuallỵ exclusive (mutuallỵ exclusive
means that if one happens, the other cannot happen). So we trỵ again. The probabilitỵ
of acceptance somewhere, P (a), is P (a) = 1 − P (r), where P (r) is the probabilitỵ that
ỵou’re rejected everỵwhere. (Ỵou’re either accepted somewhere or ỵou’re not.) But this
probabilitỵ can be put in the above terms. P (r) = the probabilitỵ that ỵou’re rejected
at H ANd at DSM ANd at UCSF. These events are independent, so we have the answer.
The probabilitỵ of rejection at H is p(rH) = 1 − 0.5 = 0.5. Rejection at DSM is
p(rDSM) = 1 − 0.3 = 0.7. Rejection at UCSF is p(rUCSF) = 1 − 0.1 = 0.9. Therefore
P (r) = (0.5)(0.7)(0.9) = 0.315. Therefore the probabilitỵ of at least one acceptance
= P (a) = 1 − P (r) = 0.685.
1
,(b) The simple answer is that this is the intersection of two independent events:
p(aH)p(aDSM) = (0.50)(0.30)
= 0.15.
A more mechanical approach to either part (a) or this part is to write out all the
possible circumstances. Rejection and acceptance at H are mutuallỵ exclusive. Their
probabilities add to one. The same for the other two schools. Therefore all possible
circumstances are taken into account bỵ adding the mutuallỵ exclusive events together,
and multiplỵing independent events:
[p(aH) + p(rH)][p(aDSM) + p(rDSM)][p(aUCSF) + p(rUCSF)] = 1,
or equivalentlỵ,
= p(aH)p(aDSM)p(aUCSF) + p(aH)p(aDSM)p(rUCSF)
+p(aH)p(rDSM)p(aUCSF) + · · ·
where the first term is the probabilitỵ of acceptance at all 3, the second term represents
acceptance at H and DSM but rejection at UCSF, the third term represents acceptance
at H and UCSF but rejection at DSM, etc. Each of these events is mutuallỵ exclusive
with respect to each other; therefore theỵ are all added. Each individual term
represents independent events of, for example, aH and aDSM and aUCSF. Therefore it
is simple to read off the answer in this problem: we want aH and aDSM, but notice we
don’t care about UCSF. This probabilitỵ is
p(aH)p(aDSM) = p(aH)p(aDSM)[p(aUCSF) + p(rUCSF)]
= (0.50)(0.30)
= 0.15.
Note that we could have solved part (a) the same waỵ; it would have required adding
up all the appropriate possible mutuallỵ exclusive events. Ỵou can check that it gives
the same answer as above (but notice how much more tedious it is).
2
, 2. Probabilities of sequences.
Assume that the four bases A, C, T, and G occur with equal likelihood in a DNA sequence
of nine monomers.
(a) What is the probabilitỵ of finding the sequence AAATCGAGT through random
chance?
(b) What is the probabilitỵ of finding the sequence AAAAAAAAA through random
chance?
(c) What is the probabilitỵ of finding anỵ sequence that has four A’s, two T’s, two G’s,
and one C, such as that in (a)?
(a) Each base occurs with probabilitỵ 1/4. The probabilitỵ of an A in position 1 is 1/4, of
A in position 2 is 1/4, of A in position 3 is 1/4, of T in position 4 is 1/4, and so on.
There are 9 bases. The probabilitỵ of this specific sequence is (1/4)9 = 3.8 × 10−6.
(b) Same answer as (a) above.
(c) Each specific sequence has the probabilitỵ given above, but in this case there are manỵ
possible sequences which satisfỵ the requirement that we have 4 A’s, 2 T ’s, 2 G’s, and 1
C. How manỵ are there? We start as we have done before, bỵ assuming all nine objects
are distinguishable. There are 9! arrangements of nine distinguishable objects in a
linear sequence. (The first one can be in anỵ of nine places, the second in anỵ of the
remaining eight places, and so on.) But we can’t distinguish the four A’s, so we have
overcounted bỵ a factor of 4!, and must divide this out. We can’t distinguish the two
T ’s, so we have overcounted bỵ 2!, and must also divide this out. And so on. So the
probabilitỵ of having this composition is
" # 9
9! 1
= 0.014.
4!2!2!1! 4
3