Written by students who passed Immediately available after payment Read online or as PDF Wrong document? Swap it for free 4,6 TrustPilot
logo-home
Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 8 pages
Exam (elaborations)

SUS1501 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 (232431)- DUE 14 August 2026

Document preview thumbnail
Preview 2 out of 8 pages

SUS1501 Assignment 2 (COMPLETE ANSWERS) Semester 2 2026 (232431)- DUE 14 August 2026; 100% TRUSTED Complete, trusted solutions and explanations. For assistance, Whats-App 0.8.1..2.7.8..3.3.7.2... Ensure your success with us...... 1. BACKGROUND FACTS In assignment 1, one of the questions was: “In January 2026 Patrice Motsepe's net worth was estimated to be US$ 4.2 billion." My personal opinion on this statement is most closely described by: a. Good for him – he is brilliant and worked hard to earn this. b. The only problem I have with this is that it wasn’t me with US$ 4.2 billion! c. No problem with this. I'm sure Motsepe gives huge amounts to charities. d. I think that it is morally wrong for anyone to have that much money. e. I think that active steps should be taken to correct such immoral wealth. This is a huge amount of money – over R 70 billion. Just putting this in a bank account at 5% interest would yield R 3.5 billion rand income every year! R 3.5 billion!! Every year!! Do you remember which option you chose? In this assignment we are going to zoom in on option “a” specifically: “Good for him – he worked hard to earn this”. What this option is basically saying is, that the wealth of billionaires like Motsepe are completely reasonable and justifiable? What we want you to do in this assignment is to examine this option (i.e. someone, perhaps even you, having US$ 4.2 billion) from the perspective of Kant’s formula of universal law version of the categorical imperative. 2. EVALUATE USING KANT'S CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE (We've done the first two stages for you) 1. State your proposed act as a maxim: "Patrice Motsepe will accumulate US$ 4.2 billion (A) over the course of his life (C) in order to get really, really rich (E)." 2. Restate this maxim as a universal law: "All people (8.1 billion of them) will accumulate US$ 4.2 billion over the course of their life in order to get really, really rich." 3. Is the maxim above conceivable in a world ruled by the universal law; COMPULSORY Answer here IN YOUR OWN WORDS You may NOT use AI in any way to write or edit what you submit here. If you do you will be heavily penalized. OPTIONAL – If you want to use AI to language edit what you wrote above you may do so here. 4. Would you rationally act on the maxim above in such a world. COMPULSORY Answer here IN YOUR OWN WORDS You may NOT use AI in any way to write or edit what you submit here. If you do you will be heavily penalized. OPTIONAL – If you want to use AI to language edit what you wrote above you may do so here. 3. FORM AN OPINION On the basis of your analysis above, answer the following questions: 1. What would Kant probably have said about Motsepe’s wealth? COMPULSORY Answer here IN YOUR OWN WORDS You may NOT use AI in any way to write or edit what you submit here. If you do you will be heavily penalized. OPTIONAL – If you want to use AI to language edit what you wrote above you may do so here. 2. Why do you think this? You MUST state your premises (reasons) explicitly as we taught you in the section on arguments (A DARN GOOD ARGUMENT - INFORMAL LOGIC). If you do not do this, you will not pass this assignment. COMPULSORY - minimum of 200 words Answer here IN YOUR OWN WORDS You may NOT use AI in any way to write or edit what you submit here. If you do you will be heavily penalized. OPTIONAL – If you want to use AI to language edit what you wrote above you may do so here. 3. What do you think about Patrice Motsepe’s wealth? COMPULSORY Answer here IN YOUR OWN WORDS You may NOT use AI in any way to write or edit what you submit here. If you do you will be heavily penalized. OPTIONAL – If you want to use AI to language edit what you wrote above you may do so here. 4. Why do you think this? COMPULSORY - minimum of 200 words Answer here IN YOUR OWN WORDS You may NOT use AI in any way to write or edit what you submit here. If you do you will be heavily penalized. OPTIONAL – If you want to use AI to language edit what you wrote above you may do so here.

Content preview

SUS1501
Assignment 2 Semester 2 2026
Unique number: 232431
Due date: 14 August 2026

Assignment 02

SUS1501 – Sustainability and Greed

Student Number:
Date:
Teaching Assistant Name:

Declaration:

By submitting this assignment, I implicitly declare that this is my own work.

I am aware that if ANY unacknowledged copying or AI usage is detected in ANY part of
this assignment, I will get 0 (zero) for the entire assignment.

INSTRUCTIONS:


In this assignment you will submit two answers to each question. The first will be the

, Assignment 02

SUS1501 – Sustainability and Greed

Student Number:
Date:
Teaching Assistant Name:

Declaration:

By submitting this assignment, I implicitly declare that this is my own work.

I am aware that if ANY unacknowledged copying or AI usage is detected in ANY part of this
assignment, I will get 0 (zero) for the entire assignment.

INSTRUCTIONS:


In this assignment you will submit two answers to each question. The first will be the
answers IN YOUR OWN WORDS.


 Read the background facts.
 Fill in your assignment contributions under the relevant headings in your own words
in the space provided.
 Use any AI engine to edit your original submissions and fill these in the space
provided.
 Save the file as a Word document with a short name (myUnisa will reject files with
long names);
 Submit this file into the Assessment 2 assignment space on myUnisa;
 Take a screen grab of the final submission acknowledgement on myUnisa and save
this somewhere safe in case of any disputes:
 Check under the Assignments tool that there is a date in the “Processed” cell for the
SUS1501 Assignment 2.
 DO NOT DELETE THE TEMPLATE CONTENT TO REDUCE YOUR TURNITIN SCORE


1. BACKGROUND FACTS


In assignment 1, one of the questions was:

Connected book
 image
Lucas Andrianos, Guillermo Kerber, Jan-Willem Sneep Sustainable Alternatives for Poverty Reduction and Eco-Justice
Publisher: 2014 ISBN: 9781443870252 Edition: Unknown

Document information

Uploaded on
March 13, 2026
File latest updated on
August 9, 2026
Number of pages
8
Written in
2026/2027
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers
$4.76
Purchased by 15 students

Wrong document? Swap it for free Within 14 days of purchase and before downloading, you can choose a different document. You can simply spend the amount again.
Written by students who passed
Immediately available after payment
Read online or as PDF

Seller avatar
Reputation scores are based on the amount of documents a seller has sold for a fee and the reviews they have received for those documents. There are three levels: Bronze, Silver and Gold. The better the reputation, the more your can rely on the quality of the sellers work.
EduPal
4.2
(14312)
Sold
153712
Followers
36023
Items
5087
Last sold
1 hour ago

Reviews from verified buyers



Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their exams and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can immediately select a different document that better matches what you need.

Pay how you prefer, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card or EFT and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Working on your references?

Create accurate citations in APA, MLA and Harvard with our free citation generator.

Working on your references?

Frequently asked questions