Surname1
Your Name
Supervisors Name
Course Name
Due Date
Artificial Intelligence and Personhood
In the Crash Course video “Artificial Intelligence & Personhood," the question arises on the
assumption that machines may or are conscious; does that mean humans are just conscious
machines? The video explains Functionalism, which explains that consciousness emerges from
functional aspects of systems no matter what they are made up of. This idea, related to the
Turing Test (1:40), means that when artificial intelligence imitates human action effectively, one
must begin to doubt consciousness.
However, philosopher John Searle's Chinese Room Argument (6:30) challenges this
notion. Searle describes the case when an AI initiates an action that looks intelligent, though the
AI itself does not understand it and, thus, is not conscious. As such, it implies that consciousness
may, therefore, be more than a physical phenomenon and points to what machines can bring
forth.
Therefore, the video does not have conclusive support for the notion that humans are purely
mechanical. It presents two possibilities:
1. Functionalism (3:15): The host's logic is clear: consciousness is how systems work, and
both AI and human minds can be seen as operating alike. AI systems can interact in two
processes: conversing with people and solving problems.
2. The Chinese Room Argument (6:3 0) Searle’s Chinese room example: Searle further
proved that an AI could mimic human response without comprehending the question
Your Name
Supervisors Name
Course Name
Due Date
Artificial Intelligence and Personhood
In the Crash Course video “Artificial Intelligence & Personhood," the question arises on the
assumption that machines may or are conscious; does that mean humans are just conscious
machines? The video explains Functionalism, which explains that consciousness emerges from
functional aspects of systems no matter what they are made up of. This idea, related to the
Turing Test (1:40), means that when artificial intelligence imitates human action effectively, one
must begin to doubt consciousness.
However, philosopher John Searle's Chinese Room Argument (6:30) challenges this
notion. Searle describes the case when an AI initiates an action that looks intelligent, though the
AI itself does not understand it and, thus, is not conscious. As such, it implies that consciousness
may, therefore, be more than a physical phenomenon and points to what machines can bring
forth.
Therefore, the video does not have conclusive support for the notion that humans are purely
mechanical. It presents two possibilities:
1. Functionalism (3:15): The host's logic is clear: consciousness is how systems work, and
both AI and human minds can be seen as operating alike. AI systems can interact in two
processes: conversing with people and solving problems.
2. The Chinese Room Argument (6:3 0) Searle’s Chinese room example: Searle further
proved that an AI could mimic human response without comprehending the question
