Instructor Manual for Dynamic Business Law The Essentials 5th Edition Nancy Kubasek - Teaching Solutions & Resources

INSTRUCTOR MANUAL FOR M M


Dynamic Business Law The Essentials, 5th Edition, Nancy Kubasek C
M M M M M M M M M


hapter 1-25M




Chapter 1: An Introduction to the Fundamentals of Dynamic Business Law an
M M M M M M M M M M M

dMBusinessMEthics

1. CHAPTERMOVERVIEW

ChapterM1MlaysMtheMfoundationMforMtheMtextbook.MTheMtextbookMemphasizesMwaysMinMwhichMbusi
nessMlawMintersectsMwithMtheMsixMfunctionalMareasMofMbusiness.MThroughoutMtheMtextbook,MtheMau
thorsMwillMencourageMstudentsMtoM―connectMtoMtheMcore,‖MandMrememberMtheMwaysMinMwhichMla
wMintersectsMwithMotherMareasMofMstudy,MincludingMcorporateMmanagement,MproductionMandMtrans
portation,Mmarketing,MresearchMandMdevelopment,MaccountingMandMfinance,MandMhumanMresource
Mmanagement.




ThisMmanualMsupportsMtheM―connectingMtoMtheMcore‖MthemeMbyMgivingMideasMforMassignmentsMth
atMencourageMstudentsMtoMintegrateMtheirMbusinessMlawMknowledgeMwithMknowledgeMtheyMareMacq
uiringMfromMtheirMotherMbusinessMclasses.MTheMmanualMalsoMencouragesMprofessorsMtoMimproveM t
heirMteachingMskills.MFinally,MtheMmanualMsuggestsMteachingMideasMforMbothMbeginningMandMexper
iencedMteachers.

2. LEARNINGMOBJECTIVES
AfterMreadingMthisMchapter,MstudentsMwillMbeMableMtoManswerMtheMfollowingMquestions:

1. WhatMisMbusinessMlaw?
2. HowMdoesMbusinessMlawMrelateMtoMbusinessMeducation?
3. WhatMareMtheMpurposesMofMlaw?
4. WhatMareMalternativeMwaysMtoMclassifyMlaw?
5. WhatMareMtheMsourcesMofMlaw?
6. WhatMareMtheMvariousMschoolsMofMjurisprudence?

3. LECTUREMNOTESMWITHMDEFINITIONS

a. InMtheMnews…
TeachingMtip:M ForMeachMchapter,MconsiderMaskingMstudentsMtoMrelateMcurrentMnewsMitemsMtoMm
aterialMfromMtheMchapter.

InMadditionMtoMideasMstudentsMcomeMupMwithMonMtheirMown,MconsiderMweavingMinMnewsM
storiesMprovidedMbyMtheMMcGraw-Hill.MStoriesMareMavailableMviaMaMMcGraw-
HillMDVD,MandMonMtheMpublisher‘sMwebMsite.




1-1
©M2021MMcGraw-
HillMEducation.MAllMrightsMreserved.MNoMreproductionMorMdistributionMwithoutMtheMpriorMwrittenMconsentMofMMcGraw-
MHillMEducation.

,ForMChapterMOne,MMcGraw-HillMoffersMtheMfollowingMstories:

―SmokingMBan:M TobaccoMTyrants:MGoneMTooMFar?MManyMStatesMAreMPuttingMStrongerMRestrict
ionsMonMWhereMYouMCanMSmoke‖
 HaveMstatesMgoneMtooMfarMinMbanningMsmoking?
 WhoseMinterestsMareMstateMlegislaturesMlookingMoutMforMinMbanningMsmoking?

―CollegeMOfficerMDealingsMWithMLendersMScrutinized.‖
 ShouldMregulatorsMtakeMaMmoreMcarefulMlookMatMcollegeMofficers?
 WhyMcreatedMchangesMinMtheMwaysMcollegeMofficersMinteractMwithMlenders?


b. WhatMisMbusinessMlaw?
BusinessMlawMconsistsMofMtheMenforceableMrulesMofMconductMthatMgovernMtheMactionsMofMbuye
rsMandMsellersMinMmarketMexchanges.

c. HowMdoesMbusinessMlawMrelateMtoMbusinessMeducation?
BusinessMlawMappliesMtoMtheMsixMfunctionalMareasMofMbusiness:
 Management
 ProductionMandMtransportation
 Marketing
 ResearchMandMdevelopment
 AccountingMandMfinance
 HumanMresourceMmanagement

d. WhatMareMtheMpurposesMofMlaw?
 ProvidingMorder
 ServingMasManMalternativeMtoMfighting
 FacilitatingMaMsenseMthatMchangeMisMpossible
 EncouragingMsocialMjustice
 GuaranteeingMpersonalMfreedoms
 ServingMasMaMmoralMguide

e. WhatMareMalternativeMwaysMtoMclassifyMlaw?
OneMwayMtoMclassifyMlaw:
PrivateMlawMinvolvesMdisputesMbetweenMprivateMindividualsMorMgroups.
PublicMlawMinvolvesMdisputesMbetweenMprivateMindividualsMorMgroupsMandMtheirMgovernment.

AMsecondMwayMtoMclassifyMlaw:
CivilMlawMisMtheMbodyMofMlawsMthatMgovernMtheMrightsMandMresponsibilitiesMeitherMbetweenMpers
onsMorMbetweenMpersonsMandMtheirMgovernment.
CriminalMlawMisMtheMbodyMofMlawsMthatMinvolveMtheMrightsMandMresponsibilitiesManMindividualMh
asMwithMrespectMtoMtheMpublicMasMaMwhole.




1-2
©M2021MMcGraw-
HillMEducation.MAllMrightsMreserved.MNoMreproductionMorMdistributionMwithoutMtheMpriorMwrittenMconsentMofMMcGraw-
MHillMEducation.

,TeachingMtip:MAskMstudentsMtoMgiveManMexampleMofMaMfactMsituationMthatMledMtoMbothMcriminalM
andMcivilMlawsuits,Me.g.,MtheMO.J.MSimpsonMtrials.

f. WhatMareMtheMsourcesMofMlaw?
SourcesMofMbusinessMlawMare:
1. Constitutions
ConstitutionalMlawMrefersMtoMtheMgeneralMlimitsMandMpowersMofMgovernmentsMasMstatedMin
MtheirMwrittenMconstitutions.
2. StatutesMorMlegislativeMactions
StatutesMorMlegislativeMactionsMreferMtoMtheMassortmentMofMrulesMandMregulationsMputMfor
thMbyMlegislatures.
3. Cases
CaseMlawM(orMcommonMlaw)MisMtheMcollectionMofMlegalMinterpretationsMmadeMbyMjudges.MPr
ecedentMisMaMtoolMusedMbyMjudgesMtoMmakeMrulingsMonMcasesMonMtheMbasisMofMkeyMsimilariti
esMtoMpreviousMcases.
StareMdecisisMisMaMprincipleMstatingMthatMrulingsMmadeMinMhigherMcourtsMareMbindingMprecede
ntMforMlowerMcourts.
TeachingMtip:MTheMfirstMtimeMyourMstudentsMencounterManMappellateMcaseMinMtheMreadings,Msh
owMthemMwhatMstareMdecisisMlooksMlikeMinMtheMcontextMofMaMrealMcase.
4. AdministrativeMlaw
AdministrativeMlawMisMtheMcollectionMofMrulesMandMdecisionsMmadeMbyMadministrativeMagenci
esMtoMfillMinMparticularMdetailsMmissingMfromMconstitutionsMandMstatutes.
5. Treaties
AMtreatyMisMaMbindingMagreementMbetweenMtwoMstatesMorMinternationalMorganizations.
6. ExecutiveMorders
AnMexecutiveMorderMisMaMdirectiveMthatMcomesMfromMtheMpresidentMorMstateMgovernor.

g. WhatMareMtheMvariousMschoolsMofMlegalMinterpretation?
SomeMschoolsMofMlegalMinterpretationMinclude:
 IdentificationMwithMtheMVulnerable—
MemphasisMonMfairnessMandMlookingMoutMforMthoseMwithMtheMleastMpower.
 HistoricalMSchool/MTradition—emphasisMonMtheMuseMofMtraditionsMandMstareMdecisis.
 LegalMRealism—judgesMconsiderMcontextMsuchMasMsocialMandMeconomicMconditions.
 Cost-benefitMAnalysis—
emphasisMisMonMassigningMmonetaryMvaluesMtoMcostsMandMbenefitsMofMtheMlawMinMorderM
toMmakeMcalculationsMtoMmaximizeMtheMratioMofMbenefitsMtoMcosts.

TeachingMtip:M ConsiderMusingM―TheMCaseMofMtheMSpelunceanMExplorersM(linkMbelow)MtoMmake
MtheM
schoolsMofMjurisprudenceMcomeMalive.

h. AppendixMonMCriticalMThinkingMandMBusinessMLaw
CriticalMthinkingMincludesMtheMapplicationMofMevaluativeMstandardsMtoMassessMtheMqualityMorMthe
MreasoningMbeingMofferedMtoMsupportMtheMconclusion.M CriticalMthinkersMwillMfollowMthisMpatternM

ofMcarefulMthinkingMwhenMtheyMreadManMargument:
1. FindMtheMfacts.
2. LookMforeMtheMissue.




1-3
©M2021MMcGraw-
HillMEducation.MAllMrightsMreserved.MNoMreproductionMorMdistributionMwithoutMtheMpriorMwrittenMconsentMofMMcGraw-
MHillMEducation.

, 3. IdentifyMtheMjudge‘sMreasonsMandMconclusion.
4. LocateMinMtheMdecisionMtheMrulesMofMlawMthatMgovernMtheMjudge‘sMreasoning.
5. ApplyMcriticalMthinkingMtoMtheMreasoning.M EvaluateMtheMreasoning.
 LookMforMpotentialMambiguity.
 ConsiderMtheMstrengthMofManalogies.
 CheckMtheMqualityMofMtheMjudge‘sMreasoning.
 DecideMwhetherMimportantMinformationMisMmissing.
 ConsiderMtheMpossibilityMofMrivalMcauses.


4. TEACHINGM SKILLS:M BLOOM’SM TAXONOMYM SETSM THEM STAGEM TOMT
HINKMABOUTMTHEMKINDSMOFMQUESTIONSMTOMASKMYOURMSTUDENTS
BenjaminMBloom,MinMhisMTaxonomyMofMEducationalMObjectives,*MdevelopedMaMhierarchyMofM
cognitiveMfunctions.MHisMworkMsetsMtheMstageMforMteachersMtoMunderstandMwhyMitMisMimportant
MtoM
thinkMcarefullyMaboutMtheMkindsMofMquestionsMtheyMaskMinMclass.

TheMObjective SampleMquestions
Knowledge  WhatMisMbusinessMlaw?
LowestMlevelMofMlearningMandMisMmostlyMmemo  WhatMareMtheMfourMelementsMofMaMneglige
ry.MTheMstudentMrecognizesMandMrecallsMinforma nceMclaim?
tion.
Comprehension  WhatMisMyourMunderstandingMofMtheMconc
LowestMlevelMofMunderstanding.MTheMstude eptMofMstareMdecisis?
ntMparaphrasesMorMexplainsMsomething.  WhatMdoesMyourMtextbookMmeanM
byMdeontology?
Application  HowMwouldMaMnaturalMlawMthinkerMrespo
StudentMdemonstratesMherMunderstandingMofMa ndMtoMthisMparticularMfactMpattern?
bstractMrules,Mprinciples,MorMgeneralizationsMb  UseMaMparticularMcaseMruleMtoMdetermine
yMusingMthemMtoMsolveMlife-likeMproblems. whetherMtheMplaintiffMwillMbeMsuccessful
MinMherMclaim.
Analysis  ProvideMtheMreasoningMforMtheMfollowing
StudentMbreaksMdownMaMcommunicationM Mstatement:MAllMcontractsMdoMnotMneedMt

toMdiscoverMtheMhiddenMstructureMasMwell oMbeMinMwritingMtoMbeMenforceable.
MasMassumptions.  BreakMdownMaMparticularMjudge‘sMopinionMt
o
understandMtheMassumptionsMtheMjudge
MisM
making.
Synthesis  ExplainMhowMtwoMparticularMschoolsMofMle
StudentMcreativelyMcombinesMelementsMandMpa galMinterpretationMareMrelated.
rtsMtoMformMaMwholeMnewMstructure.  MakeMaMconnectionMbetweenMduressMa
ndMinsanity.
Evaluation  IdentifyMandMexplainMaMreasoningMflawMinM
HighestMlevelMofMlearning.MStudentMmakes theMjudge‘sMargument.
MaMcriticalMjudgmentMaboutMtheMvalueMofMt  EvaluateMtheMfollowingMstatement:
he


* BENJAMINMBLOOM,MTAXONOMYMOFMEDUCATIONALMOBJECTIVES:MT
1-4
©M2021MMcGraw-
HillMEducation.MAllMrightsMreserved.MNoMreproductionMorMdistributionMwithoutMtheMpriorMwrittenMconsentMofMMcGraw-
MHillMEducation.