WGU C845 VUN1 Task 1 ,2& 3 | Passed
on First Attempt |Latest Update with
Complete Solution.
THIS EXAM CONTAINS:
WGU C845 VUN1 Task 1 ,2& 3
Latest Update with Complete Solution
WGU C845 VUN1
Guaranteed Pass
, WGU C845 VUN1 Task 1 | Passed on First
Attempt |Latest Update with Complete Solution
VUN1 — VUN1 Task 1: Managing Security Operations and Access Controls
Information Systems Security - C845
A. Apply an Access Control Model
A.1. Chosen Access Control Model
I have chosen the Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) model. The principles of RBAC are:
• Role Assignment: A user is assigned to a role based on their job function (e.g., "Finance
Analyst").
• Permission Assignment: Permissions to perform operations on systems are assigned to roles,
not to individual users.
• Session Management: A user activates a role to gain the associated permissions for a session.
• Least Privilege: Users should only have the minimum level of access necessary to perform their
job duties.
The organization's access control structure, as seen in the user matrix, is implicitly role-based (e.g.,
"Finance manager," "HR coordinator"). Applying a formal RBAC model would streamline this by ensuring
permissions are strictly tied to business functions, reducing complexity and the potential for user error
when assigning permissions.
A.2. Four Misalignments with RBAC Principles
1. Misalignment 1: Privilege Escalation Beyond Role Scope
• Description: The "Junior system admin" (J. Lopez) has "Domain admin" privileges. A
junior role should not have the highest level of access in a Windows environment.
• Conflict with RBAC: This violates the principle of least privilege. The role "Junior system
admin" implies a subset of administrative duties, not unrestricted domain-wide control.
2. Misalignment 2: Unnecessary Access Across Departments
• Description: The "Finance analyst" (L. Cheng) has "Full access" to the CRM, a system
, primarily for Sales and Support. A finance role typically does not require full modification
rights in a customer relationship system.
• Conflict with RBAC: This violates least privilege and separation of duties. It allows for
potential data manipulation outside the user's core business function.
3. Misalignment 3: Violation of User-Role Assignment Post-Termination
• Description: The "HR assistant" (P. Ellis), who was terminated on 2025-05-20, has an
"Active" account status and successfully logged in on 2025-06-29.
• Conflict with RBAC: RBAC requires timely revocation of role assignments upon a change
in employment status. An active session for a terminated user completely bypasses the
security provided by the role structure.
4. Misalignment 4: Overly Broad Privileged Access
• Description: The "IT administrator" (T. Miller) has "Full admin" access to "All internal
systems," and the log shows they made a firewall rule change without a ticket_id.
• Conflict with RBAC: While some access is necessary, blanket "Full admin" access
violates least privilege and impedes accountability. It does not segment duties within the
IT department itself.
on First Attempt |Latest Update with
Complete Solution.
THIS EXAM CONTAINS:
WGU C845 VUN1 Task 1 ,2& 3
Latest Update with Complete Solution
WGU C845 VUN1
Guaranteed Pass
, WGU C845 VUN1 Task 1 | Passed on First
Attempt |Latest Update with Complete Solution
VUN1 — VUN1 Task 1: Managing Security Operations and Access Controls
Information Systems Security - C845
A. Apply an Access Control Model
A.1. Chosen Access Control Model
I have chosen the Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) model. The principles of RBAC are:
• Role Assignment: A user is assigned to a role based on their job function (e.g., "Finance
Analyst").
• Permission Assignment: Permissions to perform operations on systems are assigned to roles,
not to individual users.
• Session Management: A user activates a role to gain the associated permissions for a session.
• Least Privilege: Users should only have the minimum level of access necessary to perform their
job duties.
The organization's access control structure, as seen in the user matrix, is implicitly role-based (e.g.,
"Finance manager," "HR coordinator"). Applying a formal RBAC model would streamline this by ensuring
permissions are strictly tied to business functions, reducing complexity and the potential for user error
when assigning permissions.
A.2. Four Misalignments with RBAC Principles
1. Misalignment 1: Privilege Escalation Beyond Role Scope
• Description: The "Junior system admin" (J. Lopez) has "Domain admin" privileges. A
junior role should not have the highest level of access in a Windows environment.
• Conflict with RBAC: This violates the principle of least privilege. The role "Junior system
admin" implies a subset of administrative duties, not unrestricted domain-wide control.
2. Misalignment 2: Unnecessary Access Across Departments
• Description: The "Finance analyst" (L. Cheng) has "Full access" to the CRM, a system
, primarily for Sales and Support. A finance role typically does not require full modification
rights in a customer relationship system.
• Conflict with RBAC: This violates least privilege and separation of duties. It allows for
potential data manipulation outside the user's core business function.
3. Misalignment 3: Violation of User-Role Assignment Post-Termination
• Description: The "HR assistant" (P. Ellis), who was terminated on 2025-05-20, has an
"Active" account status and successfully logged in on 2025-06-29.
• Conflict with RBAC: RBAC requires timely revocation of role assignments upon a change
in employment status. An active session for a terminated user completely bypasses the
security provided by the role structure.
4. Misalignment 4: Overly Broad Privileged Access
• Description: The "IT administrator" (T. Miller) has "Full admin" access to "All internal
systems," and the log shows they made a firewall rule change without a ticket_id.
• Conflict with RBAC: While some access is necessary, blanket "Full admin" access
violates least privilege and impedes accountability. It does not segment duties within the
IT department itself.
