Wittgenstein Study guides, Class notes & Summaries
Looking for the best study guides, study notes and summaries about Wittgenstein? On this page you'll find 75 study documents about Wittgenstein.
Page 2 out of 75 results
Sort by
-
STRAIGHTERLINE PHIL 101 INTRODUCTION TO PHILOSOPHY GRADED EXAM 2 - APRIL 2022
- Exam (elaborations) • 10 pages • 2022
-
Available in package deal
-
- $10.49
- + learn more
Page path 
•	PHIL101_MH_V6 
•	Topic 8: The Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries: The Continental Tradition 
Started on	Sunday, April 3, 2022, 5:38 PM 
State	Finished 
Completed on	Sunday, April 3, 2022, 5:52 PM 
Time taken	14 mins 13 secs 
Grade	175.00 out of 175.00 (100%) 
Question 1 
Correct 
8.75 points out of 8.75 
 Flag question 
Question text 
According to David Hume, what do we directly observe? 
Select one: 
 a. physical objects 
 b. sense impressions 
 c. ourselves 
 d. our brains 
...
-
‘Religious Language is meaningless’. Evaluate this claim. -30 marks
- Essay • 10 pages • 2021
-
- $8.92
- 5x sold
- + learn more
Includes a very comprehensive plan for a 30 mark essay for Edexcel that can easily be turned into a fully written essay. 
Has a fully written introduction, conclusion and AO1 boxes explaining each topic. 
Includes the topics: analogy, symbols, language games, verification & falsification.
-
Religious Studies A level OCR Philosophy Year 2: Religious Language: Wittgenstein
- Summary • 2 pages • 2024
-
Available in package deal
-
- $6.16
- + learn more
This 2 page document provides a summary of Wittgenstein's view of religious language, with criticisms along the way. 
 
What's inside: 
- Wittgenstein's picture theory 
- logical positivism with strengths and weaknesses 
- The vagueness of words 
- Wittgenstein's criticism of logical positivism 
- D.Z Phillips' view
-
AQA Philosophy Essay - Is Religious Language Meaningful? - A*
- Essay • 5 pages • 2023
-
- $4.52
- + learn more
This coherently written, marked and graded (A*) philosophy essay answers the question of 'Is religious language meaningful?'. It discusses cognitive and non-cognitive conceptions of religious language from Ayer, Hare, and Mitchell, as well as numerous relevant counterarguments. Feedback was "this would certainly be in the top 21-25 band" (out of 25 marks). It is targeted to AQA Philosophy A-Level, on the topic of Metaphysics of God.
-
A level Religious Studies Edexcel: Religious Language
- Summary • 10 pages • 2023
-
Available in package deal
-
- $7.11
- + learn more
These notes helped me to achieve an A* and summarises the following: 
- what religious language is 
- the types of religious language 
- criticisms and strengths 
- alternative views
Get paid weekly? You can!
-
Religious Language A Level RS Notes
- Summary • 8 pages • 2023
-
- $9.56
- + learn more
Detailed notes on section 4 of the Pearson Edexcel A Level RS Specification (Paper 1 - Philosophy) 
 
Includes: 
Aquinas and analogy (Predicative; Proportional) 
Paul Tillich on Symbolism 
Rudolf Otto on numinosity 
Logical Positivism 
Ayer's Verification Principle 
Flew's Falsification Principle 
Wittgenstein on Language Games
-
Philosophy of Religion Exam VERIFIED QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS
- Exam (elaborations) • 8 pages • 2023
-
- $9.56
- + learn more
definition of religion>>> commonly divided into 2 types: substantive and functional 
*often, religions combine the two approaches 
substantive religion>>> attends to its substance, nature, essence; focus on the CONTENT or religious belief in God or the supernatural 
Problem with this ->some religions don't do this (Buddhism) and therefore wouldn't be classified as a religion 
Functional religion>>> emphasize that the religion is a constellation of social and rit...
-
Volledige uitwerking inclusief jurisprudentie week 1
- Case • 17 pages • 2023
-
Available in package deal
-
- $7.17
- + learn more
Volledige uitwerking inclusief jurisprudentie van week 1
-
PHI 103 QUIZ 4 | RATED 100%
- Exam (elaborations) • 10 pages • 2021
-
- $9.99
- + learn more
PHI 103 QUIZ 4 | RATED 100%PHI 103 QUIZ 4 Question 1 1 / 1 pts The following is one of the ways (listed in our text) to assess the quality of an inference to the best explanation: Is it indubitably true? Does it help us explain other phenomena as well? Is there proof of it? Does the result seem important? Question 2 1 / 1 pts This philosopher claimed that science should focus on falsifiability rather than confirmation. Karl Popper Friedrich Nietzsche Ludwig Wittgenstein Galileo Question 3 1 / 1 ...
-
Assess Flews view on religious language/ assess the falsification symposium
- Essay • 3 pages • 2023
-
Available in package deal
-
- $10.99
- + learn more
A well explained evaluative essay in the falsification principle I have critically explained every point and hope it is useful I received 33/40 marks which is an A*
That summary you just bought made someone very happy. Also get paid weekly? Sell your study resources on Stuvia! Discover all about earning on Stuvia