100% tevredenheidsgarantie Direct beschikbaar na je betaling Lees online óf als PDF Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Samenvatting

Research Workshop: Survey - summary

Beoordeling
-
Verkocht
-
Pagina's
33
Geüpload op
24-05-2023
Geschreven in
2022/2023

I provided the summary for chapters included in each lectures. Hope this helps!












Oeps! We kunnen je document nu niet laden. Probeer het nog eens of neem contact op met support.

Documentinformatie

Geüpload op
24 mei 2023
Aantal pagina's
33
Geschreven in
2022/2023
Type
Samenvatting

Voorbeeld van de inhoud

, LECTURE I
Introduction:What is survey research about?
2 Produce statistics/draw inferences abouta target audience.
C ↳ Disadvantages
Advantages
->
Relatively low cost ->
Generally limited to scaled or check-list questions

->
Relatively fastdelivery -> No control over response rate
->
Rapid data processing -> Provide information more than
understanding
-> can search large population
->
Increasing public resistance

-> various mode:phone, mail, Internet, f2f... -
Difficult to exploreissues in depth.
C Two inferences

How
->


closely the sample responding mirrors the population -> external validity
-> How well answers measure characteristics internal validity
Errors in surveys

① Common sources of errors
C A worded question
poorly
↳ Deviations from the script by the interviewer

C
Misunderstanding on the part of the interviewee
Cy
Memory problem on the part of the interviewer
C. The way the information is recorded by the interviewer

② Types of errors
↳ Random

Sample: sampling errors
->




-
a Questions:invalidity
↳ Biased

Samplebias:not equal chance for everyone in the population
-




Question bias
->




Designing questions
① General rules ② Common mistakes
↳ Remember C.
your RQ Ambiguous terms
C. Decide Co
exactly what you want to find out Long questions
↳ Consider Cn Double-barreled
your audience questions
↳ C.
Imagine yourself respondent
as a Very general questions
Would you answer the question? C
Leading questions
->



How would you answer the question? Cn Double
negative
->




Identify any vague misleading questions
->


or


1

, ③ What to consider?
↳ Is
your systolic pressure normal atthis moment?
↳ Do respondents have the knowledge to answer the questions?
↳ Do you want just a yes/no answer, have you given more possibilities?
↳ Have you thought whether you should include "don't know option?
↳ Are
relying too
you much on the respondents' memory?
or "I
④ Midpoint don'tknow"

If you include don't know option/middle category, people will use it.
->



If you need people to choose one or the other:do not include "don't know"
->
If itis possible that people lack knowledge required to answer a
particular question:
including don't know can be sensible.
-> some will spend less time thinking about difficult question.
↳ Beware
-



Leaving "don'tknow"/middle
out option may cause irritation.

sometimes middle
->




ground/don't know is a
possibility.

Answer options and measurement level
(DN-0-1-R
↳y based on what researcher desires

⑥ Being specific
↳ How detailed should the answer be?
↳ Sometimes, is more burdensome.
more precise
⑦ Social desirability
↳ You answer as what society expect you to answer
↳ Make undesirable answer less threatening

Everybody makes mistake
->




->
Anonymous data
->
Desirability varies between groups and culture
⑧ Balanced question
↳ Balanced
pros and cons in a question
↳ Is it A, or is it B?

⑨ Primacy and intimacy
↓ ↓
first ans last ans
cannot leave out individual bias
category category -
↳ Rotate answer -- ↓ bias at the
aggregate level

, ⑩ Open a close question
C
Open-ended question
-> Noless bias due to
options
validity
C increase

->
can be
exhausting for a respondent
->
Explorative questions

Unanticipated responses
Very important to clarify the question
->




->


Transformations after datacollection / lots of differentresponse.
-> sometimes answer categories are
preferred
->
Advantages
In
Respondents answer in their own term
Cn Allow for
new,unexpected responses
C
Exploratory generate fixedanswer categories
-




Disadvantages
->




Cn
Time-consuming
C
Difficultto code
2 Interviewer variation in
recording answers

Pretest
G
Pretesting an interview

Evaluate question
->




↳ It is worded
easy to read as

In
Respondents can understand in a consistent way
->
Behaviors
*
Whether or not the interviewers read the questions as worded
↳ Whether not the
or respondents ask for clarification
C. Whether or not the respondents initially give an adequate answer thatrequires
interviewer
probing
Results are systematic and replicable
->




Cnpretesting a self-administered questionnaires -> in person, w/a group of potential respondents

Debugging a computer-assisted instrument
-> The ease of use

The contigency instructions
->
are working as
advantages
intended - computer's
Cp
Survey instruments length
€5,99
Krijg toegang tot het volledige document:

100% tevredenheidsgarantie
Direct beschikbaar na je betaling
Lees online óf als PDF
Geen vaste maandelijkse kosten

Maak kennis met de verkoper
Seller avatar
trnphnglinh

Maak kennis met de verkoper

Seller avatar
trnphnglinh Universiteit van Amsterdam
Bekijk profiel
Volgen Je moet ingelogd zijn om studenten of vakken te kunnen volgen
Verkocht
0
Lid sinds
2 jaar
Aantal volgers
0
Documenten
3
Laatst verkocht
-

0,0

0 beoordelingen

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recent door jou bekeken

Waarom studenten kiezen voor Stuvia

Gemaakt door medestudenten, geverifieerd door reviews

Kwaliteit die je kunt vertrouwen: geschreven door studenten die slaagden en beoordeeld door anderen die dit document gebruikten.

Niet tevreden? Kies een ander document

Geen zorgen! Je kunt voor hetzelfde geld direct een ander document kiezen dat beter past bij wat je zoekt.

Betaal zoals je wilt, start meteen met leren

Geen abonnement, geen verplichtingen. Betaal zoals je gewend bent via iDeal of creditcard en download je PDF-document meteen.

Student with book image

“Gekocht, gedownload en geslaagd. Zo makkelijk kan het dus zijn.”

Alisha Student

Veelgestelde vragen