Unit 6 Criminal Investigation Procedures in Practice

Distinction standard expert witness statement to use for simulated court cross-referencing. Easy canvas to reword for your case study and achieve a Distinction without all the hard work.

Distinction Standard full analysis of three legislations (highly detailed for PACE act 1984 with code breakdowns and cases before to prove why PACE is necessary). Breakdown of court systems, Case studies post PACE, Mens Rea and Actus Reus Examples and many other legislations. Followed by in depth evaluations and comparisons and Harvard referencing.

This assignment is based solely on your individual criminal case, so it cannot be copied. My answer simply depicts the statement made regarding my case, and a recorded cross examination was carried out. This allows for the expert witness to justify their lack of or certain questions giving contradictory or suspicious responses by the defendant.

Learners should produce a written report that demonstrates understanding of the stages of a criminal investigation and the resources available to them to gather evidence. Learners should demonstrate interview skills to obtain information from suspects. The results should be recorded electronically or documented in a report. This assignment was graded a distinction piece, it guarantees a high quality assignment, and good grade

Learners must research and outline the legal framework that investigators must follow in order to secure a criminal conviction. For this assignment I was graded a distinction, this assignment is straightforward and guarantees a quality grade.

Distinction graded, message me for any questions :))

This is the witness state i had used in my mock courtroom scenario, there are a few mistakes which were brought up, and i did say that unfortunately that was a mistake i had made.