100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Getting Started in Teaching for Nursing & Health Professions Test Bank 2025

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
767
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
15-12-2025
Written in
2025/2026

Getting Started in Teaching for Nursing & Health Professions Test Bank 2025 | Halstead & Billings | 20 MCQs/Chapter 2️⃣ SEO Product Description (200–300 words) Master the essential competencies of teaching in nursing and the health professions with this 2025-aligned graduate-level test bank developed exclusively for Getting Started in Teaching for Nursing and the Health Professions (1st Edition) by Judith A. Halstead & Diane M. Billings. This professionally designed educator-focused test bank delivers 20 high-quality multiple-choice questions per chapter, each with verified correct answers and evidence-based rationales grounded in current best practices in nursing and health professions education. Items are written at the analysis, evaluation, and synthesis levels, making them ideal for MSN–Education, PhD in Nursing Education, and faculty development programs. Designed for new instructors, clinical experts transitioning into teaching, and allied health educators, this test bank strengthens instructional confidence while reinforcing real-world teaching decision-making across classroom, clinical, simulation, and online learning environments. What’s Included: Full chapter-by-chapter coverage of the 2025 first edition 20 graduate-level MCQs per chapter Verified answers with clear, educator-focused rationales Content aligned to instructional design, curriculum development, assessment strategies, clinical teaching, simulation pedagogy, learning technology, evaluation, and classroom management Suitable for course exams, quizzes, faculty onboarding, self-study, and educator competency development Ideal For: MSN–Education & PhD Nursing Education learners New nurse educators & clinical faculty Faculty development and onboarding programs Allied health and health professions educators Continuing professional development in teaching and learning Trusted as a gold-standard teaching guide, this test bank transforms theory into practical teaching mastery, helping educators build confidence, improve instructional effectiveness, and succeed in academic roles. 3️⃣ High-Value SEO Keywords (8) nursing educator test bank 2025 Halstead and Billings test bank teaching in nursing education questions health professions education test bank faculty development exam questions MSN nursing education test bank PhD nursing education assessment teaching strategies nursing instructors 4️⃣ Optimized Hashtags (10) #NursingEducation #NurseEducator #FacultyDevelopment #TeachingInNursing #HealthProfessionsEducation #MSNEducation #PhDNursingEducation #AcademicNursing #ClinicalTeaching #EducatorTestBank

Show more Read less
Institution
NCLEX RN
Course
NCLEX RN











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
NCLEX RN
Course
NCLEX RN

Document information

Uploaded on
December 15, 2025
Number of pages
767
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

  • facultydevelopment
  • msneducat

Content preview

GETTING STARTED IN TEACHING FOR
NURSING AND THE HEALTH
PROFESSIONS
1ST EDITION
• AUTHOR(S)JUDITH A. HALSTEAD;
DIANE M. BILLINGS


TEST BANK
1
Reference
Ch. 1 — Introduction to curriculum development
Stem
A graduate program plans to revise its clinical practicum
sequence after several clinical preceptors reported students
lacked readiness for complex care. As the nurse educator on the
curriculum committee, you must decide the first curriculum
activity. Which step best aligns with curriculum development


Page | 1

,principles to ensure the revision is outcome-driven and
evidence-based?
A. Immediately add additional clinical hours to the practicum to
increase exposure.
B. Conduct a needs analysis mapping current student outcomes
against practice expectations.
C. Replace current preceptors with new preceptors from higher-
acuity settings.
D. Create a simulation week focused on complex care without
changing other curriculum elements.
Correct answer
B
Rationales
Correct (B): A needs analysis (gap analysis) is the foundational
curriculum step that identifies mismatches between intended
outcomes and current learner performance; it directs targeted
revisions and supports evidence-based decisions. It aligns
curriculum changes to learner needs rather than making
unexamined tactical fixes.
Incorrect (A): Adding hours is an input change that may not
address the specific competency gaps and can waste resources
if not guided by documented needs.
Incorrect (C): Replacing preceptors is a staffing solution that
may help but ignores potential curricular, assessment, or
learner preparation issues; it's reactive without root-cause
analysis.
Page | 2

,Incorrect (D): Simulation can target skills but implementing it
without aligning outcomes, assessment methods, and existing
clinical experiences risks inconsistency and poor transfer to
practice.
Teaching point
Start curriculum change with a systematic needs analysis to
guide targeted revisions.
Citation
Halstead, J. A., & Billings, D. M. (2025). Getting Started in
Teaching for Nursing and the Health Professions (1st Ed.). Ch. 1.


2
Reference
Part 1 — Participating in Curriculum Development: Faculty role
and responsibilities
Stem
A faculty member is asked to join a new curriculum committee
but is unsure what responsibilities are expected. As the
committee chair, which statement best communicates a role
that balances individual faculty autonomy with curriculum
coherence?
A. Faculty should retain full autonomy to design their course
content independent of program outcomes.
B. Faculty should align course objectives, teaching strategies,
and assessments with program outcomes while contributing
Page | 3

, subject expertise.
C. Faculty should let the curriculum committee dictate all
teaching methods and assessment tasks.
D. Faculty should focus only on classroom teaching; curriculum
development is an administrative task.
Correct answer
B
Rationales
Correct (B): This option captures the dual responsibility: faculty
contribute discipline expertise while ensuring their courses are
coherently aligned with program-level outcomes, reflecting
professional responsibility and shared governance.
Incorrect (A): Unfettered autonomy risks fragmented
curriculum and poor construct alignment; program coherence
requires alignment to common outcomes.
Incorrect (C): Committee-driven dictatorship undermines
faculty ownership and creativity; effective curricula rely on
collaborative shared governance.
Incorrect (D): Limiting faculty to classroom teaching neglects
their essential role in curriculum design, evaluation, and
continuous improvement.
Teaching point
Faculty must align course-level design with program outcomes
while contributing discipline expertise.



Page | 4
$38.49
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
davidmurima

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
davidmurima Teachme2-tutor
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
New on Stuvia
Member since
1 month
Number of followers
0
Documents
24
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions