LSAT PRACTICE TEST Practice Exam
**Question 1.** Which sentence best expresses the main conclusion of the
argument about corporate recycling programs?
A) Companies should increase profits by cutting waste.
B) Recycling programs improve public image regardless of cost.
C) Mandatory recycling policies are unnecessary.
D) Voluntary recycling initiatives are more effective than mandates.
Answer: D
Explanation: The argument emphasizes that voluntary programs achieve better
results than imposed rules.
**Question 2.** The author’s statement “the data are inconclusive” functions
primarily as a:
A) premise supporting the conclusion.
B) counter‑premise challenging the premise.
C) background fact.
D) conclusion.
Answer: B
Explanation: It directly opposes the earlier claim, acting as a counter‑premise.
**Question 3.** Which of the following is an implicit assumption needed for the
conclusion that “all city parks should be fenced” to follow from the premise that
“fencing reduces vandalism”?
A) Vandalism is the only problem parks face.
, LSAT PRACTICE TEST Practice Exam
B) Fencing is inexpensive.
C) Reducing vandalism improves park use.
D) All parks currently lack fences.
Answer: C
Explanation: The conclusion depends on the belief that less vandalism makes
parks better.
**Question 4.** Which answer most strengthens the argument that “online
courses increase student retention”?
A) Students who take online courses also attend tutoring.
B) Retention rates rise after schools add flexible scheduling.
C) Online courses are cheaper than in‑person classes.
D) Many students prefer face‑to‑face interaction.
Answer: B
Explanation: Flexible scheduling directly supports the claim about retention.
**Question 5.** Which choice most weakens the claim that “electric cars are
always more environmentally friendly than gasoline cars”?
A) Electric cars use renewable energy sources.
B) Battery production emits large amounts of CO₂.
C) Some electric cars have longer ranges.
D) Gasoline prices are rising.
, LSAT PRACTICE TEST Practice Exam
Answer: B
Explanation: High emissions from battery manufacturing undermine the
environmental advantage.
**Question 6.** In the passage, the phrase “a paradox of abundance” most likely
means:
A) Too much of something creates scarcity.
B) Abundance leads to waste.
C) Plenty causes confusion.
D) Excess is always beneficial.
Answer: A
Explanation: A paradox of abundance suggests that surplus can produce opposite
effects.
**Question 7.** Which of the following best identifies the flaw in the argument
that “because elite athletes eat protein shakes, protein shakes must cause elite
performance”?
A) Correlation does not imply causation.
B) The argument relies on anecdotal evidence.
C) It assumes all athletes are the same.
D) It overlooks alternative explanations.
Answer: A
Explanation: The reasoning mistakenly treats correlation as causation.
, LSAT PRACTICE TEST Practice Exam
**Question 8.** Which statement, if true, would most likely make the conclusion
that “the new tax policy will reduce income inequality” valid?
A) The policy raises taxes on the top 5 % of earners.
B) Middle‑class wages increase by 2 % annually.
C) Government spending on education rises.
D) The number of low‑income households grows.
Answer: A
Explanation: Targeting the highest earners directly addresses income disparity.
**Question 9.** The author’s tone toward the proposed highway expansion is
best described as:
A) enthusiastic.
B) skeptical.
C) neutral.
D) supportive.
Answer: B
Explanation: The language questions the benefits and highlights drawbacks,
indicating skepticism.
**Question 10.** Which of the following most accurately captures the passage’s
main point about the “Great Migration”?
**Question 1.** Which sentence best expresses the main conclusion of the
argument about corporate recycling programs?
A) Companies should increase profits by cutting waste.
B) Recycling programs improve public image regardless of cost.
C) Mandatory recycling policies are unnecessary.
D) Voluntary recycling initiatives are more effective than mandates.
Answer: D
Explanation: The argument emphasizes that voluntary programs achieve better
results than imposed rules.
**Question 2.** The author’s statement “the data are inconclusive” functions
primarily as a:
A) premise supporting the conclusion.
B) counter‑premise challenging the premise.
C) background fact.
D) conclusion.
Answer: B
Explanation: It directly opposes the earlier claim, acting as a counter‑premise.
**Question 3.** Which of the following is an implicit assumption needed for the
conclusion that “all city parks should be fenced” to follow from the premise that
“fencing reduces vandalism”?
A) Vandalism is the only problem parks face.
, LSAT PRACTICE TEST Practice Exam
B) Fencing is inexpensive.
C) Reducing vandalism improves park use.
D) All parks currently lack fences.
Answer: C
Explanation: The conclusion depends on the belief that less vandalism makes
parks better.
**Question 4.** Which answer most strengthens the argument that “online
courses increase student retention”?
A) Students who take online courses also attend tutoring.
B) Retention rates rise after schools add flexible scheduling.
C) Online courses are cheaper than in‑person classes.
D) Many students prefer face‑to‑face interaction.
Answer: B
Explanation: Flexible scheduling directly supports the claim about retention.
**Question 5.** Which choice most weakens the claim that “electric cars are
always more environmentally friendly than gasoline cars”?
A) Electric cars use renewable energy sources.
B) Battery production emits large amounts of CO₂.
C) Some electric cars have longer ranges.
D) Gasoline prices are rising.
, LSAT PRACTICE TEST Practice Exam
Answer: B
Explanation: High emissions from battery manufacturing undermine the
environmental advantage.
**Question 6.** In the passage, the phrase “a paradox of abundance” most likely
means:
A) Too much of something creates scarcity.
B) Abundance leads to waste.
C) Plenty causes confusion.
D) Excess is always beneficial.
Answer: A
Explanation: A paradox of abundance suggests that surplus can produce opposite
effects.
**Question 7.** Which of the following best identifies the flaw in the argument
that “because elite athletes eat protein shakes, protein shakes must cause elite
performance”?
A) Correlation does not imply causation.
B) The argument relies on anecdotal evidence.
C) It assumes all athletes are the same.
D) It overlooks alternative explanations.
Answer: A
Explanation: The reasoning mistakenly treats correlation as causation.
, LSAT PRACTICE TEST Practice Exam
**Question 8.** Which statement, if true, would most likely make the conclusion
that “the new tax policy will reduce income inequality” valid?
A) The policy raises taxes on the top 5 % of earners.
B) Middle‑class wages increase by 2 % annually.
C) Government spending on education rises.
D) The number of low‑income households grows.
Answer: A
Explanation: Targeting the highest earners directly addresses income disparity.
**Question 9.** The author’s tone toward the proposed highway expansion is
best described as:
A) enthusiastic.
B) skeptical.
C) neutral.
D) supportive.
Answer: B
Explanation: The language questions the benefits and highlights drawbacks,
indicating skepticism.
**Question 10.** Which of the following most accurately captures the passage’s
main point about the “Great Migration”?
