100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached 4.2 TrustPilot
logo-home
Exam (elaborations)

Getting Started in Teaching for Nursing & Health Professions Test Bank 2025

Rating
-
Sold
-
Pages
767
Grade
A+
Uploaded on
13-12-2025
Written in
2025/2026

Getting Started in Teaching for Nursing & Health Professions Test Bank 2025 | Halstead & Billings | 20 MCQs/Chapter 2) SEO Product Description (200–300 words) Master the transition into effective teaching with this graduate-level test bank fully aligned to Getting Started in Teaching for Nursing and the Health Professions (1st Edition, 2025) by Judith A. Halstead & Diane M. Billings—the gold-standard guide for new and developing nurse educators. This 2025 educator test bank delivers 20 rigorously developed MCQs per chapter, each with verified correct answers and evidence-based rationales, designed specifically for MSN-Education, PhD in Nursing Education, and faculty development programs across nursing and allied health disciplines. Every question is written at the analysis, evaluation, and synthesis levels of Bloom’s taxonomy, mirroring the complex decision-making required of educators in real academic, clinical, simulation, and online teaching environments. Items emphasize instructional design, curriculum development, clinical teaching strategies, assessment literacy, learning technology integration, evaluation, and classroom management, ensuring direct relevance to educator practice—not rote recall. This test bank is ideal for new faculty onboarding, clinicians transitioning into teaching roles, and graduate learners preparing for educator responsibilities. It strengthens teaching confidence, supports academic role socialization, and reinforces evidence-based educational decision-making aligned with contemporary health professions education standards. What’s Included Full-chapter coverage of the 2025 edition 20 high-quality MCQs per chapter Verified answers with clear, educator-focused rationales Aligned with nurse educator and health professions teaching competencies Suitable for exams, self-study, faculty development, and course support If you are serious about teaching mastery in nursing and the health professions, this test bank provides the structured, practice-ready assessment support you need. 3) 8 High-Value SEO Keywords nursing educator test bank 2025 teaching in nursing test bank Halstead and Billings test bank health professions education MCQs faculty development exam questions MSN nursing education test bank PhD nursing education assessment teaching in health professions questions 4) 10 Optimized Hashtags #NursingEducation #NurseEducator #FacultyDevelopment #HealthProfessionsEducation #TeachingInNursing #MSNEducation #PhDNursingEducation #EducatorTestBank #AcademicNursing #ClinicalTeaching

Show more Read less
Institution
NCLEX RN
Course
NCLEX RN











Whoops! We can’t load your doc right now. Try again or contact support.

Written for

Institution
NCLEX RN
Course
NCLEX RN

Document information

Uploaded on
December 13, 2025
Number of pages
767
Written in
2025/2026
Type
Exam (elaborations)
Contains
Questions & answers

Subjects

  • nursingeducation
  • educatort

Content preview

GETTING STARTED IN TEACHING FOR
NURSING AND THE HEALTH
PROFESSIONS
1ST EDITION
• AUTHOR(S)JUDITH A. HALSTEAD;
DIANE M. BILLINGS


TEST BANK



1
Reference
Ch. 1 — Introduction to curriculum development
Stem
A nursing program is revising its curriculum after a recent
employer survey showed graduates lack proficiency in care

Page | 1

,transitions. As the faculty lead, you must prioritize curricular
changes while balancing existing accreditation standards and
limited faculty time. Which next step best aligns curriculum
development principles to ensure effective, evidence-based
change?
Options
A. Draft new course objectives on transitions immediately and
present them at the next faculty meeting.
B. Conduct a focused needs assessment that triangulates
employer feedback with graduate outcomes and clinical data.
C. Replace an elective with a required transitions course to
create space in the curriculum.
D. Assign a single experienced faculty member to redesign all
clinical courses to emphasize transitions.
Correct answer
B
Rationales
Correct (B): Conducting a focused needs assessment uses
multiple data sources to validate the employer feedback and
identify specific gaps; this aligns with curricular principles that
changes be data-driven and contextually justified before
altering outcomes or structure. It supports stakeholder
alignment and accreditation readiness.
A: Drafting objectives before confirming the scope or root
causes risks misalignment with program outcomes and may
waste faculty effort if the problem differs from surface
Page | 2

,feedback.
C: Removing an elective without assessment may harm
curricular balance and does not guarantee alignment with
program outcomes or stakeholder needs.
D: Centralizing redesign to one faculty member risks narrow
perspective, reduces shared governance, and undermines
faculty ownership and sustainability.
Teaching point
Base curriculum changes on a triangulated needs assessment,
not single feedback sources.
Citation
Halstead, J. A., & Billings, D. M. (2025). Getting Started in
Teaching for Nursing and the Health Professions (1st Ed.). Ch. 1.


2
Reference
Ch. 1 — Introduction to curriculum development
Stem
During curriculum mapping, you find redundancy in content on
patient safety and a gap in content on population health.
Faculty are split: some argue redundancy reinforces learning;
others want to eliminate duplicated sessions to make room for
population health. Which curriculum principle should guide
your synthesis and decision?


Page | 3

, Options
A. Eliminate all redundancy immediately to maximize curricular
breadth.
B. Retain redundancy because repetition always improves
mastery.
C. Analyze alignment of redundant elements with program
outcomes and student level, then selectively consolidate or
scaffold.
D. Replace the redundant patient safety content with
population health content even if it reduces safety coverage.
Correct answer
C
Rationales
Correct (C): Best practice is to evaluate whether redundant
content supports progressive competence (scaffolding) or is
true duplication; selectively consolidating maintains learning
progression while freeing time for gaps. This reflects alignment
and intentional sequencing principles.
A: Eliminating all redundancy risks removing necessary
reinforcement and weakens spiraled learning.
B: Blanket retention ignores inefficiencies and misaligns with
competency sequencing; repetition must be purposeful.
D: Substituting without analysis risks undermining critical safety
competencies and accreditation expectations.



Page | 4
$39.99
Get access to the full document:

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

Get to know the seller
Seller avatar
anthonywaithaka

Get to know the seller

Seller avatar
anthonywaithaka Princeton
View profile
Follow You need to be logged in order to follow users or courses
Sold
0
Member since
5 months
Number of followers
1
Documents
140
Last sold
-

0.0

0 reviews

5
0
4
0
3
0
2
0
1
0

Recently viewed by you

Why students choose Stuvia

Created by fellow students, verified by reviews

Quality you can trust: written by students who passed their tests and reviewed by others who've used these notes.

Didn't get what you expected? Choose another document

No worries! You can instantly pick a different document that better fits what you're looking for.

Pay as you like, start learning right away

No subscription, no commitments. Pay the way you're used to via credit card and download your PDF document instantly.

Student with book image

“Bought, downloaded, and aced it. It really can be that simple.”

Alisha Student

Frequently asked questions